Currently Viewing:
AMCP 2017
Dr Jennifer Graff on How Payers Make Decisions
August 01, 2017
Laura Topor Discusses Challenges of e-Prescribing Specialty Medications
July 11, 2017
Dr Jacqueline Glover: Financial Knowledge Is Part of Informed Consent
July 10, 2017
Laura Topor Explains the Value of Real-Time Benefit Transactions
June 27, 2017
Dr Jacqueline Glover: Clinicians' Obligations of Justice Regarding Costs of Care
June 24, 2017
Dr Lou Garrison Discusses Challenges of Working With Real-World Data
June 16, 2017
Currently Reading
Dr Neil Minkoff Explains How 340B Impacts Pharmacies and Payers Differently
June 15, 2017
Laura Topor: Clearing Up Misconceptions About e-Prescribing
June 07, 2017
Dr Jacqueline Glover Discusses the Complicated Balance of Ethics in Drug Trials
June 05, 2017
Dr Richard J. Willke Discusses Challenges of Working With Real-World Data
June 02, 2017
Susan A. Cantrell Explains the Necessity of Pre- and Post-Approval Communications
May 31, 2017
Dr Neil Minkoff Discusses Evolution and Consequences of 340B Programs
May 30, 2017
Dr Doug Hillblom Discusses Legislative Pushes Toward e-Prescribing
May 25, 2017
Dr Matthew Pickering Describes Challenges of New Measure Implementation
May 24, 2017
Dr Aimee Tharaldson Discusses the Orphan Drug Approval Trend
May 22, 2017
Dr Gail Bridges on the Importance of Real-World Results Matching Clinical Trial Outcomes
May 21, 2017
Dr Liz Zhou Discusses Real-World Implications of Toujeo Switching Trial
May 19, 2017
Dr Richard J. Willke on the Value of Real-World Data for Health Plans
May 18, 2017
Dr Lou Garrison on the Discussions Surrounding Outcomes-Based Arrangements
May 17, 2017

Dr Neil Minkoff Explains How 340B Impacts Pharmacies and Payers Differently

All stakeholders stand to gain from the 340B program in different ways, but they also take on different risks, like the potential impact for health plans on rebate contracts, said Neil Minkoff, MD, chief medical officer of EmpiraMed.


All stakeholders stand to gain from the 340B program in different ways, but they also take on different risks, like the potential impact for health plans on rebate contracts, said Neil Minkoff, MD, chief medical officer of EmpiraMed.

Transcript (slightly modified)

How does the 340B program impact stakeholders differently?

All the different stakeholders get different benefits and risks from participating in a 340B program. Clearly, the covered entity, which is the clinical entity that’s doing the 340B dispensing, is right at the heart of it. What they’re supposed to get out of it is an ability to raise revenue, increase their revenue, by getting reimbursed normal market prices for drugs that they’re buying at a steep discount, and use those savings to offset other forms of care for underserved or indigent populations.

The plans have only caught on recently to just the impact of 340B, and a lot of that I think is due to the massive expansion of the number of 340B pharmacies since the ACA [Affordable Care Act] was passed. So the plans are still figuring it out, but one of the things the plans want to know is, a) are these savings really providing better care in our communities or can any of those savings be shared in terms of our costs, our premiums, etc., and b) what plans are trying to understand is since 340B drugs don’t generate rebate income, how are their rebate contracts going to be implemented and affected by patients going to 340B programs. 

 
Copyright AJMC 2006-2017 Clinical Care Targeted Communications Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
x
Welcome the the new and improved AJMC.com, the premier managed market network. Tell us about yourself so that we can serve you better.
Sign Up
×

Sign In

Not a member? Sign up now!