Issues
September 2008 EDITORIAL
- Return on Investment for Bariatric Surgery
Eric A. Finkelstein, PhD, MHA; and Derek S. Brown, PhD This editorial discusses the cost implication of bariatric surgery and whether or not return on investment analysis should be used to make coverage decisions. Full Text PDF CLINICAL
- Metastatic Non"Small Cell Lung Cancer: Costs Associated With Disease Progression
Kathleen M. Fox, MHS, PhD; John M. Brooks, PhD; and Jennifer Kim, PharmD The incremental cost of disease progression among patients with metastatic stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer versus those without progression was $12,327 for 3 postprogression months. Full Text PDF
- Validating the Framingham Offspring Study Equations for Predicting Incident Diabetes Mellitus
Gregory A. Nichols, PhD; and Jonathan B. Brown, PhD, MPP Diabetes mellitus (DM) prediction equations developed by the Framingham Offspring Study were validated, but the point score underestimated DM risk in an HMO population. Full Text PDF MANAGERIAL
- Medicine Reimbursement Recommendations in Canada, Australia, and Scotland
Joel Lexchin, MD; and Barbara Mintzes, PhD Pharmacoeconomic analyses appear to account for differences in recommendations made regarding public payment when national bodies consider the same drugs for the same indication. Full Text PDF Appendix POLICY
- A Study on the Economic Impact of Bariatric Surgery
Pierre-Yves Cremieux, PhD; Henry Buchwald, MD, PhD; Scott A. Shikora, MD; Arindam Ghosh, PhD; Haixia Elaine Yang, PhD; and Marric Buessing, BA This study analyzes the return on investment for bariatric surgery in the United States. Full Text PDF
- Long-term Economic Benefits Attributed to IVF-conceived Children: A Lifetime Tax Calculation
Mark P. Connolly, MHE; Michael S. Pollard, PhD; Stijn Hoorens, MSc; Brian R. Kaplan, MD; Selwyn P. Oskowitz, MD; and Sherman J. Silber, MD We estimate the future net tax contributions from an IVF-conceived child to highlight that removing barriers to fertility treatments can have long-term economic benefits. Full Text PDF METHODS
- Therapies for Treatment of Osteoporosis in US Women: Cost-effectiveness and Budget Impact Considerations
Anna N. A. Tosteson, ScD; Russel T. Burge, PhD; Deborah A. Marshall, PhD; and Robert Lindsay, MD Osteoporosis treatment for high-risk women is cost-effective, with bisphosphonates providing the most benefit at the lowest cost. Full Text PDF LETTERS TO THE EDITORS
- Utilization Outcomes and Patient Cost Sharing
Kathleen A. Fairman, MA. Author reply by Michael E. Chernew, PhD, and Joseph P. Newhouse, PhD Full Text PDF Appendix
- Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Cancer Care
Christopher N. Mills, MD, MPH. Author reply by William E. Lafferty, MD, and M. Robyn Andersen, PhD, MPH Full Text PDF Appendix
|
|