It’s fair to say that the initial results of immunotherapy in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have been somewhat disappointing, explained Thorvardur Halfdanarson, MD, associate professor of medicine and consultant in medical oncology, Mayo Clinic.
It’s fair to say that the initial results of immunotherapy in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have been somewhat disappointing, explained Thorvardur Halfdanarson, MD, associate professor of medicine and consultant in medical oncology, Mayo Clinic.
Transcript
Is there a future for immunotherapy in neuroendocrine tumors?
I think there is a future for immunotherapy. The problem is that we don’t know who these patients are, who will respond. So, if we look at other cancers like lung cancer where we have a reliable biomarker, such as PD-L1, gastrointestinal malignancies where we have a reliable marker of a response, such as microsatellite instability. We don’t have that in neuroendocrine tumors. They are generally microsatellite stable tumors, and although they may and often express PD-L1, we don’t have good data to suggest that being a good marker. We know from small cell carcinoma of the lung that it probably doesn’t matter a whole lot what your PD-L1 expression is.
So, I think it’s fair to say that the initial results have been somewhat disappointing, but there are still signals and they’re suggesting to me that we need to pursue this as possible therapy. It’s just too hard to say where this will fit in. There are new trials coming down the pike for other malignancies using a combined approach with 2 immunotherapy agents with immunotherapy and cytotoxic therapy, and even immunotherapy with ablative therapies, such as the hepatic embolization or PRRT [peptide receptor radionuclide therapy] is something that I think would be very reasonable to explore.
So, immunotherapy is, I think, is still a target we should go after.
The Pivotal Role of Payers in Improving Health Equity, Maternal Health Care in the US
March 26th 2024A presentation at the Greater Philadelphia Business Coalition on Health's 2024 Women’s Health Summit discussed how payers, including employers and public entities, can strategically influence health care purchasing to prioritize maternal health and equity.
Read More
Oncology Onward: A Conversation With Penn Medicine's Dr Justin Bekelman
December 19th 2023Justin Bekelman, MD, director of the Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, sat with our hosts Emeline Aviki, MD, MBA, and Stephen Schleicher, MD, MBA, for our final episode of 2023 to discuss the importance of collaboration between academic medicine and community oncology and testing innovative cancer care delivery in these settings.
Listen
Dupilumab Considered Safe, Effective Treatment for Adolescent, Adult Patients With AD
March 20th 2024These posters both used the GLOBOSTAD study, which demonstrated through patient and physician assessments that dupilumab is a safe and effective treatment for adolescent and adult patients with atopic dermatitis (AD).
Read More
The Importance of Examining and Preventing Atrial Fibrillation
August 29th 2023At this year’s American Society for Preventive Cardiology Congress on CVD Prevention, Emelia J. Benjamin, MD, ScM, delivered the Honorary Fellow Award Lecture, “The Imperative to Focus on the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation,” as the recipient of this year’s Honorary Fellow of the American Society for Preventive Cardiology award.
Listen
Racial Variations in Cardiovascular Outcomes Found in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Study
March 19th 2024Based on the findings, investigators acknowledged the critical need to consider racial differences when assessing patients with hidradenitis suppurativa. Health care providers should be vigilant in addressing cardiovascular risk factors in this population, recognizing and addressing racial disparities that may impact disease management.
Read More