The data confirm what Medicaid beneficiaries report and what a study by a Wharton School professor found: physicians' willingness to take on Medicaid patients is directly related to reimbursement rates.
Data released by CDC confirm reports heard from around the country: physicians are less likely to accept new patients covered by Medicaid. In this case, the data come from the doctors themselves.
A QuickStats update included in this week’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report shows that overall, 88.9% of primary care physicians said they are accepting new patients, based on 2015 data from the National Electronic Health Records Survey. However, the survey found there are differences in acceptance rates based on the patient's expected form of payment:
In 2015, the year the data were collected, CMS reported that Medicaid covered 70.5 million Americans. The sudden surge in Americans with Medicaid due to Affordable Care Act (ACA) had made it difficult for many to find a primary care doctor, in large part because reimbursements in the program had been historically low. A 2014 article in the New England Journal of Medicine said while there are several reasons why Medicaid beneficiaries have a hard time finding a primary care doctor, low or slow payments are the main ones.
To address this, the ACA included a temporary fee boost that expired at the end of 2014. In many states, fees returned to previous levels. The 2016 Kaiser Family Foundation Medicaid report found that enrollment was rising faster on a percentage basis than spending, both at the federal level and especially at the state level.
Daniel Polsky, PhD, MPP, an economist at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, ran an experiment in which field workers tried to get appointments, half posing as Medicaid recipients, and half posing as clients with private insurance. They did the experiment in 2012, before the ACA increased Medicaid payments and again in 2014, right after the pay boost took effect. The pay increase caused about an 8% increase in the number of people who could get appointments.
In an interview published by Wharton, Polsky said, “What was really compelling about our findings was there is great variation between states in terms of how much the pay increased, because Medicaid pays different amounts in different states.”
In states where payment increases doubled, the appointment rate jumped closer to 15%.
Reference
QuickStats. Percentage of office-based primary care physicians accepting new patients, by source of payment accepted—National Electronic Health Records Survey, 2015. MMWR. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66:766. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6628a9
Navigating Health Literacy, Social Determinants, and Discrimination in National Health Plans
February 13th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the authors of a study published in the February 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® about their findings on how health plans can screen for health literacy, social determinants of health, and perceived health care discrimination.
Listen
Drs Raymond Thertulien, Joseph Mikhael on Racial Disparities in Multiple Myeloma Care Access
December 28th 2023In the wake of the 2023 American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting and Exposition, Raymond Thertulien, MD, PhD, of Novant Health, and Joseph Mikhael, MD, MEd, FRCPC, FACP, chief medical officer of the International Myeloma Foundation, discussed health equity research highlights from the meeting and drivers of racial disparities in multiple myeloma outcomes.
Listen
The Pivotal Role of Payers in Improving Health Equity, Maternal Health Care in the US
March 26th 2024A presentation at the Greater Philadelphia Business Coalition on Health's 2024 Women’s Health Summit discussed how payers, including employers and public entities, can strategically influence health care purchasing to prioritize maternal health and equity.
Read More
What We’re Reading: HHS' Funding Flat; Mifepristone Safety; Insulin Shortage
March 25th 2024Flat funding for Health and Human Services (HHS) leaves critical health initiatives stagnant; Supreme Court weighs tightening regulations on abortion pill; manufacturing delay sparks access concerns for insulin medication.
Read More