An analysis of 150 US cities’ stress rankings and the CMS star ratings of the hospitals within them reveals a significant correlation between the 2 factors, indicating that more-stressed cities tend to have lower hospital star ratings.
An analysis of 150 US cities’ stress rankings and the CMS star ratings of the hospitals within them reveals a significant correlation between the 2 factors, indicating that more-stressed cities tend to have lower hospital star ratings. The study, published in JAMA, also found associations between the star ratings and 4 of the 5 stress domains: work, money, family, and health and safety.
CMS star ratings incorporate 64 quality measures to assign ratings of 1 to 5 stars to hospitals across the United States. Large, teaching, and safety net hospitals are more likely to have lower star ratings, according to a CMS fact sheet announcing the ratings. The authors of the JAMA research thus decided to investigate whether these star ratings could be linked to city stress rankings.
Developed by WalletHub, the stress ranking of a city is determined by 27 key metrics across 5 domains: work, money, family, health and safety, and “stress-coping.” The measures used to assess these factors include the citywide rates of poverty, unemployment, divorce, crime, and residents in poor health. The findings pointed to Detroit, Michigan, as the #1 most stressed city, and Fremont, California, the least stressed as it ranked last at #150.
After creating a weighted average star rating for cities with more than 1 hospital, the researchers performed statistical analysis and found a significant correlation between the star rating and the city’s overall stress rating. In other words, a higher stress ranking (which indicates a less-stressed city) was associated with a higher hospital star rating. Cities with high stress, like Detroit or Newark, New Jersey, had relatively low star ratings, while cities like Madison, Wisconsin, with lower stress tended to have higher star ratings. The analysis also found significant associations between the star ratings and 4 of the 5 stress domains: work, money, family, and health and safety.
The researchers determined that around 20% of the variance in star ratings could be explained by community characteristics like unemployment or poverty. However, they expressed the need for further research on the causes of this correlation.
“On the one hand, hospitals in stressed cities might provide care of lower quality on average, perhaps because of inability to invest in needed clinical or technological infrastructure or staff shortages,” the authors wrote. “On the other hand, the star rating component measures may be affected by community factors such as poor public transportation or limited social support services through causal pathways other than hospital quality.”
This research points toward a larger body of evidence linking hospital star ratings to the economic well-being of the city, which some view as disproportionately punishing hospitals in low-income areas.
“It’s fine to penalize hospitals that provide bad care to poor people. We just don’t want to be penalizing hospitals that take care of more poor people,” said Ashish K. Jha, MD, MPH, in a recent interview with The American Journal of Managed Care. He said that that CMS could avoid this unfair penalization by including socioeconomic status in the risk adjustment methodology for star ratings.
Dr Chakra Chaulagain: PFS Is the "Bare Minimum," but OS Is Ideal for Choosing Between MM Therapies
March 28th 2024Response rates are important when choosing between therapies to treat multiple myeloma (MM), but improvement overall survival (OS) is the ideal, said Chakra Chaulagain MD, FACP, hematologist/oncologist, Maroone Cancer Center of Cleveland Clinic Florida.
Read More
Exploring Medicare Advantage Prior Authorization Variations
March 26th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the authors of a study published in the March 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® about their findings on variations in prior authorization use across Medicare Advantage plans.
Listen
Alopecia Areata Impacts Patient Perception, Quality of Life
March 27th 2024Patients with alopecia areata (AA) often perceive their hair loss as more severe than dermatologists do, leading to increased emotional and social problems. This study highlights the importance of understanding patient perception for better treatment and improved quality of life.
Read More
Navigating Health Literacy, Social Determinants, and Discrimination in National Health Plans
February 13th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the authors of a study published in the February 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® about their findings on how health plans can screen for health literacy, social determinants of health, and perceived health care discrimination.
Listen
The Supreme Court seems likely to reject a challenge to the abortion pill mifepristone; the FDA is inspecting far fewer pharmaceutical companies conducting clinical research; AstraZeneca has sued to block an Arkansas law that it said would unlawfully expand the 340B program to include for profit-pharmacy chains.
Read More
Poor Well-Being Scores Linked to Early Treatment Stoppage in Multiple Myeloma
March 27th 2024Investigators used the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General General Physical Wellbeing Scale to collect data on patient-reported treatment-related adverse effects, to provide clinicians guidance on predicting risk of early treatment discontinuation among ECOG-ACRIN E1A11 trial participants.
Read More