Gregory C. Simon, executive director, White House Cancer Task Force, spoke at the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Policy Summit, held just 2 days before the Cancer Moonshot Summit.
Gregory C. Simon, executive director, White House Cancer Task Force, spoke at the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Policy Summit, held just 2 days before the Cancer Moonshot Summit.
Highlighting the difference in life between 10 years back and today, Simon said, “Every field has advanced except for the way research has been done at the [National Institutes of Health]…hardly anything has changed at the NIH since World War II.”
Simon emphasized that there is really no limit on what we could do, “It’s about what we want to do. Changing culture is the most powerful thing on the planet.” Simon argued that science is not hard, its people who make things hard. The moonshot is organized around promoting collaboration between the government and outside players.
The national cancer advisory board has gathered a blue ribbon panel consisting of 29 experts who will create a report for the board, “which reaches the National Cancer Institute and finally to us,” said Simon. The blue ribbon panel will advise on how to spend the money to achieve the objectives of the cancer moonshot.
“Just like the original moonshot, the Cancer Moonshot is about using technology and the resulting information.”
Simon, a cancer survivor himself, cited how removing data silos and access to information had helped with his treatment. “My leukemia treatment was at [Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center], and subsequent care was at [George Washington University],” he said. There were no zip code or any such restrictions, he added.
“We need to know how to get to our data, who can get to it, how they use it, and how do they share it,” Simon said. “Information that I publish should be available instantly —especially if it is government-sponsored—not 2 years later when it might be too late.” Simon believes that both raw and published form of government-sponsored data should be readily accessible to whoever seeks it. “How can a physician find out more about a patient’s disease, not just the research scientist who’s working on the disease? How can the doctor get his hands on this information so he can treat his patient better?” Simon asked.
“We need a blending of disciplines,” Simon said. That’s how ideas that tell us that containing cancer, not necessarily curing it, could evolve. This would require cross-disciplinary collaborations.
Simon also emphasized the importance of patient engagement. “Researchers who do not gain input from patients will stand to lose,” he said. “We need to include patient-reported outcomes, unexpected beneficial events, [adverse events] with researchers,” he said.
“So there is nothing but a role for [health IT] in cancer care,” according to Simon.
Oncology Onward: A Conversation With Penn Medicine's Dr Justin Bekelman
December 19th 2023Justin Bekelman, MD, director of the Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, sat with our hosts Emeline Aviki, MD, MBA, and Stephen Schleicher, MD, MBA, for our final episode of 2023 to discuss the importance of collaboration between academic medicine and community oncology and testing innovative cancer care delivery in these settings.
Listen
Machine Learning Model Predicts Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk in Patients With MASLD
March 22nd 2024Machine learning models have potential for early identification of patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) who are at risk of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Read More
Emily Goldberg Shares Insights as a Genetic Counselor for Breast Cancer Risk Screening
October 30th 2023On this episode of Managed Care Cast, Emily Goldberg, MS, CGC, a genetic counselor at JScreen, breaks down how genetic screening for breast cancer works and why it is so important to increase awareness and education around these screening tools available to patients who may be at risk for cancer.
Listen
CMS is highly likely to negotiate the price of the obesity medication semaglutide in the coming years; many health care providers are trying to determine whether their cyberattack insurance will help cover their losses after the Change Healthcare hack; the US life expectancy increased for the first time in 2 years.
Read More
A global AIDS program that was in limbo for months got temporary relief after congressional negotiators agreed to a 1-year renewal in the next government funding package; the outcome of the November presidential election could determine the state of fetal tissue research in the US; federal officials and industry executives failed to make improvements that stop hacking attacks.
Read More