Incidence and Prevalence of Head Lice
Head lice infestations (Pediculus humanus
capitis) occur worldwide. Although more common
in developing countries, head lice infestations
are endemic in the United States,
particularly among school-aged children.1
Approximately 6 million to 12 million infestations
occur per year in the United States
among children 3 to 12 years of age.2 These
figures are estimates, however, because patients
may self-treat, so many cases of infestation
are never disclosed to health officials.
The beginning of the school year is often
associated with lice infestations among
children. In fact, infestations take place
throughout the year, and peak activity
occurs during the summer.3 In warm temperatures
or environments, lice lay more
eggs than in cooler temperatures and are
generally more active. Children who interact
with one another during warm weather may
transfer lice to siblings and playmates.
Infestations are more commonly spread
within families than within schools because
of close personal contact and shared brushes
and combs.3,4 "Epidemics" may seem to
occur in September because school nurses
or other school staff often screen for lice as
a means of controlling the spread of infestations,
and children who are infested may
transfer lice to school playmates during
close contact. In reality, infestations do not
begin or end with the school year. The perceived
increase in lice activity in the fall
may have more to do with monitoring practices
than with actual numbers of lice.5
A common misconception is that infestations
occur more frequently among lower
income populations, but head lice are found
among all socioeconomic groups.2 Infestations
also occur among most ethnic groups
in the United States, although African
Americans are less likely to be affected. This
lower prevalence rate is thought to be the
result of differences in the structure of the
hair shaft, which may be oval shaped and
therefore more difficult for a louse to grasp.2,3
There are, however, lice that have adapted to
the hair type commonly found among
African Americans, so the incidence in this
population is increasing.3 In the United
States, girls are somewhat more likely than
boys to become infested, perhaps because of
the sharing of brushes and combs.1,3 There is
disagreement in the reported literature about
whether long hair increases the likelihood of
becoming infested,6 but increased risk of
infestation among children with long hair
may be again associated with gender differences
and the practice of sharing grooming
items.1,3 Short hair does not prevent infestation
with head lice.6 Complete shaving of the
head generally does eliminate lice and prevents
reinfestation but is rarely an appropriate
measure to take in response to
infestation.
Pathophysiology and Life Cycle
of the Head Louse
Pediculus humanus capitis is an ectoparasite
that lives only on human hosts. No animal
hosts are associated with head lice. Lice
survive by feeding on blood drawn from the
host's scalp. Lice may feed and mate as
often as every 4 hours and may do both
concurrently.3
A female louse lays an average of 5 to 10
eggs per day. Lice prefer warm environments,
so in cool or temperate climates lice
lay eggs close to the scalp and may lay fewer
eggs. In warmer climates, however, lice may
lay eggs farther away from the scalp and may
lay more eggs. Once hatched, lice can survive
for up to 30 days. Despite the large
number of eggs that can be laid and the life-span
of the louse, the average infested host
has only approximately 20 active head lice
at one time. Hosts who are not able to groom
themselves may have more.3
Females, at an average length of 2.4 to 3.3
mm, are slightly larger than males, which
range from 2.1 to 2.6 mm. Eggs, or nits, are
very small and are silver-gray in color. Shells
left behind once the nit emerges tend to dry
up but may be mistaken for live lice or viable
nits. Adult lice can adapt to the color of their
surroundings. The small size of lice and their
ability to camouflage themselves can make
them difficult to see.
Lice infestations are spread primarily by
direct head-to-head contact. Less commonly,
fomites such as hats, scarves, and brushes
may transfer lice from one host to
another.1-3 However, lice cannot survive for
long when away from the host, so transfer by
fomite must occur relatively quickly. A louse
that has fallen from the host onto another
surface, such as the floor, probably will not
survive to infest a new host. It is a common
but incorrect belief that lice jump from head
to head. Lice cannot jump, fly, or crawl long
distances. Close, personal contact generally
is required for an infestation to spread.2,3
Effects on the Host
When lice feed, they inject saliva into the
host to promote vasodilation. The saliva may
produce an immune response in the host,
leading to pruritus.1,3 A louse's fecal material
may also contribute to scalp irritation.
Scratching an itchy scalp occasionally causes
cutaneous scalp infection, but infestation
generally is not associated with serious morbidity.1,2 In the United States, the primary
consequence of head lice infestation is
social, affecting relationships or attendance
at school or work. It is accurate to say that
the greatest "morbidity" associated with lice
infestation is missed school days because of
"no-nit" policies. These policies, which are
intended to control in-school infestations,
prohibit attendance by children who have
evidence of head lice. Children who attend
schools with no-nit policies may miss several
days of school per year. In addition to
school absences, children may be scorned
by classmates because of the stigma
attached to lice infestation in the United
States. Although socially embarrassing, required
absence from school adds to the
burden of children who are infested by isolating
them and causing them to miss valuable
classroom experience. (This topic will
be discussed in more detail in the article in
this supplement titled, "Treating and Managing
Head Lice: The School Nurse Perspective.")
Medical and nursing professionals
should resist attempts to exclude children
from school and work with policy makers to
control infestations with less negative
impact on individually affected students.
Treatment Issues
Pyrethroids are the mainstay of over-the-counter
pediculicides and include products
containing permethrin 1% (eg, Nix®) and synergized
pyrethrins (eg, A-200®, RID®, Pronto,
and R&C® shampoo). Pyrethrins are "synergized"
by the addition of piperonyl butoxide,
which enhances the pediculicide effects of
pyrethrins. Prescription pediculicides include
OVIDE® (malathion) Lotion, 0.5% and
lindane (formerly marketed as Kwell).
Resistance is a primary concern in selecting
an appropriate treatment. Documented
resistance to pyrethroids and lindane is well
established.7 Resistance to one type of
pyrethroid product probably indicates resistance
to any product in the class. Despite
increasing resistance, these products are still
widely used because they are available over-the-counter and are therefore easy to obtain
for at-home treatment. Among prescription
products, lindane resistance has also been
noted.7 In addition, the safety of lindane has
been called into question by the Food and
Drug Administration, which now recommends
its use only in certain patients for
whom other pediculicides have failed.8 Given
its reduced efficacy because of resistant
lice, as well as safety concerns, lindane is
not recommended as first-line treatment.
Malathion, another topical prescription pediculicide,
is not associated with systemic safety
issues or the development of resistance
within the United States.7
Generally accepted criteria for documenting
resistance are still under discussion.
Some practitioners state that if a product has
been correctly used but lice are still present
2 to 3 days later, resistance is likely to have
occurred. Topical pediculicides should be
reapplied if live lice are seen 7 to 10 days
after the first applications.2 If lice are present
after 2 correctly applied treatments, resistance
to the pediculicide is certain.
Another significant issue associated with
treatment is misdiagnosis. According to
research by Pollack et al, misdiagnosis of
lice infestation occurs frequently, causing
inappropriate quarantine and treatment of
children who are not infested and under-treatment
of children with active infestations.9 In a study of diagnostic accuracy
among children suspected of head lice infestation,
misdiagnosis occurred because
screeners often could not distinguish live,
viable lice from other materials, such as dandruff,
epidermal matter, and other debris.
Presence of these materials frequently
resulted in misdiagnosis of active infestation;
conversely, screeners often overlooked
live lice among children who did have active
infestations. The result was that children
who were not infested were excluded from
school more often than children who had
live infestations. Interestingly, physician
diagnosis of lice infestation was least accurate,
although nonhealthcare providers also
frequently misdiagnosed the condition.
School nurses were most accurate but failed
to distinguish live from extinct infestations.
Researchers concluded that misdiagnosis is
common, that treatment should be recommended
only with the discovery of live lice
or viable nits, and that no-nit policies should
be reevaluated because so many children
are inappropriately excluded from school.9
Resistance and misdiagnosis have been
shown to result in unnecessary and inappropriate
treatment with pediculicides. Aside
from the social effects of inappropriate treatment,
there are cost consequences. Accurate
estimates of the total costs of treatment in the
United States are difficult to obtain, but informal
estimates based on the standard cost of
over-the-counter pediculicides used twice
would be approximately $120 million for the
lower range of 6 million infestations per
year.10 Higher estimates of infestations and
the need for repetitive application when treatments
fail because of resistance substantially
increase the total costs of eradicating head
lice. Added to the direct costs of pediculicides
are the indirect costs of lost productivity
because of missed school and work days.
More discussion of direct and indirect costs of
treatments is included in the article in this
supplement titled, "Head Lice Treatment
Costs and the Impact on Managed Care."
Conclusions
Lice infestation is viewed as a socially
repugnant condition, but it is not associated
with significant morbidity except for pruritus and occasional pyoderma. Among children,
who are most likely to become infested,
the primary negative effect of lice
infestation is absence from school. Well-meaning
but misguided school policies that
exclude children with lice infestation should
be revised or eliminated. Research has
demonstrated that misdiagnosis of lice infestation
is common, and a significant number
of children who are sent home do not have
active infestations.9 This, coupled with
resistance to commonly used pyrethroid
pediculicides, results in inappropriate and
unnecessary head lice treatment commonly
occurring among school-aged children.
The effects of misdiagnosis and resistance
are costly in terms of direct and indirect costs
to society. Direct costs include costs of treatment,
which may be repeated several times if
lice are resistant. Indirect costs are even
more substantial, including missed days from
school and parental work days missed to care
for a child who has been sent home from
school. Recommendations for improving
treatment include increasing the accuracy of
diagnosis, treating only those children who
have confirmed, active infestations, resisting
no-nit policies, and using pediculicides properly
to decrease overexposure to children and
the possibility of promoting treatment-resistant
lice. Ultimately, the development of new
pediculicides will be needed as resistance
increases. These topics will be described in
more detail in this supplement.
| |