Currently Viewing:
AMCP 2017
Currently Reading
Dr Jennifer Graff on How Payers Make Decisions
August 01, 2017
Dr Jacqueline Glover: Financial Knowledge Is Part of Informed Consent
July 10, 2017
Laura Topor Explains the Value of Real-Time Benefit Transactions
June 27, 2017
Dr Jacqueline Glover: Clinicians' Obligations of Justice Regarding Costs of Care
June 24, 2017
Dr Lou Garrison Discusses Challenges of Working With Real-World Data
June 16, 2017
Dr Neil Minkoff Explains How 340B Impacts Pharmacies and Payers Differently
June 15, 2017
Dr Matthew Pickering on Working With Health Plans on Measure Implementation
June 09, 2017
Laura Topor: Clearing Up Misconceptions About e-Prescribing
June 07, 2017
Dr Jacqueline Glover Discusses the Complicated Balance of Ethics in Drug Trials
June 05, 2017
Dr Richard J. Willke Discusses Challenges of Working With Real-World Data
June 02, 2017
Susan A. Cantrell Explains the Necessity of Pre- and Post-Approval Communications
May 31, 2017
Dr Neil Minkoff Discusses Evolution and Consequences of 340B Programs
May 30, 2017
Dr Doug Hillblom Discusses Legislative Pushes Toward e-Prescribing
May 25, 2017
Dr Matthew Pickering Describes Challenges of New Measure Implementation
May 24, 2017
Dr Aimee Tharaldson Discusses the Orphan Drug Approval Trend
May 22, 2017
Dr Gail Bridges on the Importance of Real-World Results Matching Clinical Trial Outcomes
May 21, 2017
Dr Liz Zhou Discusses Real-World Implications of Toujeo Switching Trial
May 19, 2017
Dr Richard J. Willke on the Value of Real-World Data for Health Plans
May 18, 2017
Dr Lou Garrison on the Discussions Surrounding Outcomes-Based Arrangements
May 17, 2017

Repatha Offers Additional LDL-C Reduction in a Convenient Dosage Form

Michael R. Page, PharmD, RPh
Richard Mullvain, RPh, BCPS (AQC), CCCC, a cardiovascular clinical pharmacist and expert in cardiovascular care at the Essentia Health Heart & Vascular Center in Duluth, Minnesota, delivered a focused clinical review on the topic of the PCSK9 inhibitor Repatha (evolocumab), and its impact on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C).
At a Science & Innovation Theater held at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) Annual Meeting 2017 in Denver Colorado, Richard Mullvain, RPh, BCPS (AQC), CCCC, a cardiovascular clinical pharmacist and expert in cardiovascular care at the Essentia Health Heart & Vascular Center in Duluth, Minnesota, delivered a focused clinical review on the topic of the proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor Repatha (evolocumab).1
 
Mullvain discussed the definition of clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), which includes coronary heart disease (ie, acute coronary syndrome, history of myocardial infarction, stable or unstable angina, coronary or other arterial revascularization), peripheral arterial disease, and stroke or transient ischemic attack, according to guidelines published jointly in 2013 by the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association.1,2
 
Regarding the mechanistic characteristics of Repatha, Mullvain discussed the importance of PCSK9 in the body, and the therapeutic effect of inhibiting this endogenous protein. In the body, PCSK9 mediates the degradation of low-density lipoprotein receptors (LDLRs). Normally, LDLRs clear circulating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from the systemic circulation. By inhibiting PCSK9, Repatha facilitates LDLR recycling to the surface of liver cells, increasing the number of LDLRs available to clear circulating LDL-C.1,3
 
From the standpoint of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics, Repatha is a human monoclonal IgG2 antibody. Within 4 hours of administration, Repatha exerts maximum suppression of PCSK9 levels, with no clinically meaningful drug-drug interactions with high-intensity statin therapy. Drug-drug interaction studies with Repatha in combination with medications other than statins have not been performed.1,3
 
Based on pharmacokinetic data, age, patient-specific factors such as gender, race, and kidney function do not significantly affect the disposition of Repatha. Repatha is a large protein that is not metabolized by the liver or excreted by the kidneys. Rather, it is eliminated mainly through binding to its pharmacologic target (PCSK9). Additionally, because it is a large protein, Repatha is not expected to cross the blood-brain barrier.1,3
 
In 4 clinical trials, Repatha has been shown to induce significant reductions in LDL-C levels in multiple patient populations, including patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, or clinical ASCVD. These 4 studies include LAPLACE-2, which was a randomized double-blind study of patients with clinical ASCVD receiving statin therapy, DESCARTES, a 52-week safety and efficacy study, as well as RUTHERFORD-2 and TESLA, which evaluated Repatha in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia.1,4-7
 
In LAPLACE-2, patients with clinical ASCVD who required additional LDL-C reduction were randomized to receive statin therapy with any of 3 common regimens: atorvastatin 80 mg daily, rosuvastatin 40 mg daily, or simvastatin 40 mg daily. During a 4-week LDL-C stabilization period, patients received statins alone. After 4 weeks, 296 patients were randomized to receive either Repatha or a placebo (via subcutaneous injection) plus statin therapy. After 12 weeks of treatment, patients were evaluated on a primary end point of the mean percent change from baseline in LDL-C at week 12, and secondary end points of the percentage of patients achieving in LDL-C less than 70 mg/dL, and the percent change from baseline in other lipid parameters.1,4
 
Patients receiving subcutaneous injections of Repatha every 2 weeks plus statin (n = 147) achieved LDL-C reductions up to 77% greater than those achieved with placebo. Specifically, patients receiving atorvastatin 80 mg plus placebo achieved a 1% reduction in LDL-C from baseline, while patients receiving Repatha achieved a 64% reduction over the same period of time (a 63 percentage point difference). For patients receiving rosuvastatin 40 mg, a 2% increase in LDL-C was observed compared with a 65% reduction in LDL-C among patients receiving Repatha (a 66 percentage point difference). Finally, in patients receiving simvastatin 40 mg daily, a 13% increase in LDL-C was observed, versus a 64% reduction in LDL-C with Repatha (a 77 percentage-point difference).1,4
 
In terms of the percentage of patients achieving an LDL-C level less than 70 mg/dL at week 12, 90% of patients receiving Repatha with atorvastatin 80 mg, 88% of patients receiving Repatha with rosuvastatin 40 mg, and 87% of patients receiving Repatha with simvastatin 40 mg achieved this target.1,4
 


 
Copyright AJMC 2006-2017 Clinical Care Targeted Communications Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
x
Welcome the the new and improved AJMC.com, the premier managed market network. Tell us about yourself so that we can serve you better.
Sign Up
×

Sign In

Not a member? Sign up now!