Video

King v. Burwell Decision Could Exacerbate Disparities in the US

Although the decision in King v. Burwell will not directly affect states that have set up their own health insurance exchanges, they could see some benefits, according to David Blumenthal, MD, chief executive officer of The Commonwealth Fund.

Although the decision in King v. Burwell will not directly affect states that have set up their own health insurance exchanges, they could see some benefits, according to David Blumenthal, MD, chief executive officer of The Commonwealth Fund.

He explained that a win for the plaintiffs could create “a very odd reversal” of the typical way subsidies are used in the United States. Wealthy states like New York and California, which have set up their own exchanges, would continue to receive subsidies, while less well-to-do states like Alabama and Mississippi, on the federally facilitated marketplace, will no longer get subsidies.

“However, they continue to pay taxes,” Dr Blumenthal said. “This strikes me as a bad fiscal policy for the United States.”

Related Videos
Dr Emma Achola-Kothani
Marla Black Morgan, MD, Phoebe Neurology Associates
Christine Funke, MD
Toby Maher, MD, PhD, professor of clinical medicine, Keck School of Medicine at USC
Nini Wu, MD, Navista
Fred Locke, MD, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
Dr Emma Achola-Kothari
Matthew Viggiano, MD, internal medicine resident, Temple University Hospital
Krunal Patel, MD, pulmonary and critical care fellow, Temple University Hospital
M. Bradley Drummond, MD, MHS, professor of medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Related Content
AJMC Managed Markets Network Logo
CH LogoCenter for Biosimilars Logo