Care Coordination in Accountable Care Organizations: Moving Beyond Structure and Incentives

Published Online: December 18, 2012
Matthew J. Press, MD, MSc; Marilyn D. Michelow, MD; and Lucy H. MacPhail, PhD
Accountable care organizations (ACOs) are considered by many to be a key component of healthcare delivery system improvement. One expectation is that the structural elements of the ACO model, including clinical integration and financial accountability, will lead to better coordination of care for patients. But, while structure and incentives may facilitate the delivery of coordinated care, they will not necessarily ensure that care coordination is done well. For that, physicians and other healthcare providers within ACOs must possess and utilize specific skills, particularly in the areas of collaboration, communication, and teamwork. In this article, we present strategies in 3 domains—training, support tools, and organizational culture—that ACOs can implement to foster the development of these skills and support their use in clinical practice.

(Am J Manag Care. 2012;18(12):778-780)

Better coordination of care for patients is an essential component of the broad effort to improve healthcare quality and efficiency in the United States.1 But coordinating care across the various settings in which patients are treated is a daunting task.2 One possible solution to the care coordination challenge is accountable care organizations (ACOs). The great promise of ACOs is that by establishing a structure conducive to clinical integration and a payment system that demands accountability, the care that is delivered will be well coordinated. As a result, our healthcare system would be less fragmented, more fiscally responsible, and higher quality.

However, coordinating care requires more than a shared organizational structure and financial incentives.3 Individual physicians and other healthcare providers within ACOs must also know how to coordinate care. This requires specific professional skills, especially in the areas of collaboration, communication, and teamwork. These skills allow clinicians to integrate actions and expertise, negotiate differences in judgment, and determine shared priorities for patients’ care. In order to deliver coordinated care, ACOs will need to implement organizational strategies that develop and promote care coordination skills among their staff. Many of these strategies have a precedent in medicine or other professions and can be categorized into the following 3 key domains: training, support tools, and organizational culture.

Training. ACOs should establish training programs specifically designed to enhance clinicians’ care coordination skills. Interpersonal communication is fundamental to coordinating care, yet almost one-half of  physicians surveyed in 2009 acknowledged the need to improve communication processes.4,5 Some medical schools, physician groups, and nursing organizations have begun to offer training in this area, but ACOs will have to make these efforts more systematic. For instance, at Kaiser Permanente (a system with many characteristics of an ACO), physicians serving as “communication consultants” run workshops on communication between providers. Training should also include education on the roles of staff members within the care team. Understanding who is responsible for what is critical for effective collaboration in any organization, but even more so in an ACO setting, where traditional clinical roles are likely to evolve and staff from a variety of disciplines and specialties will be working together to coordinate patient care.

To build teamwork skills, ACOs can look to programs that have borrowed principles from other fields and applied them in medicine.6 For example, the US Air Force’s Medical Team Training Program was developed with an eye toward using human-factors concepts to reduce medical errors. Medical personnel are trained through a combination of coursework, observation in the work environment, and feedback. Unfortunately, evidence about the impact of this program, and others like it, is limited. Plus, the teamwork skills needed to effectively collaborate in a large, cross-disciplinary clinical setting like an ACO may differ from the emergency department or operating room settings where many of these programs have been focused. As a result, new training programs in ACOs should undergo continuous evaluation, and their success (or failure) should be disseminated so that other ACOs can learn from the experience.

The use of information systems does not obviate the need for this type of training. A study from 4 Kaiser Permanente medical centers showed that while the electronic medical record improved coordination of diabetes care, coordination suffered when providers had discordant views about team member roles.7 Likewise, nurse care managers should not be relied upon to coordinate the care of patients without also cultivating these skills among the rest of the care team. Dedicated support through additional personnel may be an important component of the overall strategy to improve care coordination. However, care coordination should be an organizationwide priority and a valued service in ACOs, and therefore everyone involved in patient care must be fully prepared to participate in the effort. This applies especially to physicians, who will always remain engaged in some of the most complex and important communications, regardless of changes in the healthcare delivery system.

Support Tools. While training will equip clinicians with care coordination skills, tools are necessary to support their use. Support tools provide structure to the content of care coordination activities and help integrate these activities into routine practice. For example, the “Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation” (SBAR) technique is a communication tool that has been used effectively to standardize information exchanged by members of the healthcare team, particularly between nurses and physicians.8 Support tools like this must be used thoughtfully, since the information that needs to be standardized varies based on the type of communication (eg, specialist consultation vs hospital unit transfer).9 Another support tool that could help communication is a checklist. In the construction industry, communication tasks are put into checklists, ensuring that experts from different fields coordinate their efforts before the project can proceed.10 Similarly, ACOs could add a checklist for communication tasks to the “plan” section of the electronic medical note template, which might compel clinicians to make communication with each other part of their plan of care.

PDF is available on the last page.

Issue: December 2012
More on AJMC.COM