Currently Viewing:
ACC 2017
Dr Rob Nolan Discusses Behavioral Foundations of eCounseling Programs
June 10, 2017
Dr Rob Nolan Explains Behavioral Principles Behind eCounseling Hypertension Program
May 15, 2017
Dr Seth J. Baum on the Patient's Role in Getting PCSK9 Inhibitors Approved by Payers
May 10, 2017
Dr William Borden Discusses MACRA Requirements From a Cardiologist's Perspective
May 08, 2017
Dr Janet Wright on Cardiologists' Role in Public Health and Prevention Efforts
April 15, 2017
Dr Rob Nolan on the Future Directions of eCounseling Research
April 14, 2017
Currently Reading
Dr Seth J. Baum Discusses Payers' Reluctance to Approve Coverage of PCSK9 Inhibitors
April 07, 2017
Dr Robert P. Giugliano Discusses the Significance of the FOURIER and EBBINGHAUS Trials
April 06, 2017
Dr Seth J. Baum on the Patient's Role in Getting PCSK9 Inhibitors Approved by Payers
March 20, 2017
Dr Jim McDermott Discusses Objectives and Outcomes of CVD-REAL Trial
March 20, 2017
Charting the Path to Health Equity: Steps for Providers
March 20, 2017
Dr Janet Wright Outlines Goals and Roadblocks of Million Hearts Initiative
March 20, 2017
Dr William Borden: Advice for Cardiologists on Adjusting to MACRA
March 19, 2017
Dr Rob Nolan Discusses Findings From REACH Hypertension eCounseling Trial
March 19, 2017
Can SGLT2 Inhibitors Prevent Heart Failure in a Broad Population?
March 19, 2017
Data Show It's Hard to Fill PCSK9 Prescriptions, Confirming Cardiologists' Complaints
March 19, 2017
Dr Robert P. Giugliano on the Results of the EBBINGHAUS Evolocumab Cognitive Study
March 18, 2017
Low-Dose Xarelto Beats Aspirin for Long-Term Prevention of Life-Threatening Blood Clots
March 18, 2017
Bringing MACRA to Cardiologists, Ready or Not
March 17, 2017

Dr Seth J. Baum Discusses Payers' Reluctance to Approve Coverage of PCSK9 Inhibitors

At the American College of Cardiology 66th Scientific Session, Seth J. Baum, MD, FACC, FACPM, FAHA, FNLA, FASPC, president of the American Society for Preventive Cardiology, discussed why insurers are so reluctant to approve coverage of PCSK9 inhibitors and how this hesitance could harm patients who are denied access to the cardiovascular drugs.


At the American College of Cardiology 66th Scientific Session, Seth J. Baum, MD, FACC, FACPM, FAHA, FNLA, FASPC, president of the American Society for Preventive Cardiology, discussed why insurers are so reluctant to approve coverage of PCSK9 inhibitors and how this hesitance could harm patients who are denied access to the cardiovascular drugs.

Transcript (slightly modified)

Why are payers reluctant to approve coverage of PCSK9 inhibitors?

Well we know from the beginning, when the PCSK9 inhibitors were approved, there was pushback immediately, and the pushback was always a financial pushback. These are very expensive drugs, are they cost effective? A number of different studies were published utilizing QALYs [quality adjusted life years] to estimate the cost-effectiveness of drugs. QALYs, by the way, most people don’t know this, the Affordable Care Act actually banned the use of QALYs in economic determinations like this, pharmacoeconomic decisions, so they really shouldn’t be used in any of these papers, yet they are.

So it looks as though it’s strictly financial. Now, periodically, the insurers will say people are writing off-label. To my knowledge, it’s not generally true. Obviously, you’re going to find some outliers, always are going to, but the PI [prescribing information] for these drugs is very, very clear.

However, a group of us just published a paper that’s coming out the 20th [of March] from Clinical Cardiology, which has a prior authorization that can be used for everyone but also defines the 5 elements of the PI with a 6-member coauthor group from varying groups and organizations. It’s a very simplified, very clear, very pragmatic product that defines these 5 elements and also employs a simple prior authorization, so hopefully the payers will embrace this and it will make the clinicians’ lives easier and it’ll make the patients healthier, so that’s the ultimate goal.

Do you think we will see insurers ease up on their requirements for approving these drugs?

We hope that payers will become less stringent with these requirements. FOURIER came out at this meeting. It was a very powerful outcomes trial that demonstrated the efficacy of PCSK9 inhibitors in a very short period of time, in just a 2-year trial, at reducing heart attack and stroke.

This is all about the patients. Patients have contracts with their insurance companies, and when a PCSK9 inhibitor is on formulary with those insurance companies and the patient is prescribed the PCSK9 inhibitor on label, they really are obligated to provide it.

I am hopeful that it will change. People are literally dying waiting for these drugs. That is not hyperbole. They are literally dying on line waiting for the drugs, so that has to come to an end.

 
Copyright AJMC 2006-2017 Clinical Care Targeted Communications Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
x
Welcome the the new and improved AJMC.com, the premier managed market network. Tell us about yourself so that we can serve you better.
Sign Up
×

Sign In

Not a member? Sign up now!