Currently Viewing:
AMCP 2017
Dr Jennifer Graff on How Payers Make Decisions
August 01, 2017
Laura Topor Discusses Challenges of e-Prescribing Specialty Medications
July 11, 2017
Currently Reading
Dr Jacqueline Glover: Financial Knowledge Is Part of Informed Consent
July 10, 2017
Dr Jacqueline Glover: Clinicians' Obligations of Justice Regarding Costs of Care
June 24, 2017
Dr Lou Garrison Discusses Challenges of Working With Real-World Data
June 16, 2017
Dr Neil Minkoff Explains How 340B Impacts Pharmacies and Payers Differently
June 15, 2017
Dr Matthew Pickering on Working With Health Plans on Measure Implementation
June 09, 2017
Laura Topor: Clearing Up Misconceptions About e-Prescribing
June 07, 2017
Dr Jacqueline Glover Discusses the Complicated Balance of Ethics in Drug Trials
June 05, 2017
Dr Richard J. Willke Discusses Challenges of Working With Real-World Data
June 02, 2017
Susan A. Cantrell Explains the Necessity of Pre- and Post-Approval Communications
May 31, 2017
Dr Neil Minkoff Discusses Evolution and Consequences of 340B Programs
May 30, 2017
Dr Doug Hillblom Discusses Legislative Pushes Toward e-Prescribing
May 25, 2017
Dr Matthew Pickering Describes Challenges of New Measure Implementation
May 24, 2017
Dr Aimee Tharaldson Discusses the Orphan Drug Approval Trend
May 22, 2017
Dr Gail Bridges on the Importance of Real-World Results Matching Clinical Trial Outcomes
May 21, 2017
Dr Liz Zhou Discusses Real-World Implications of Toujeo Switching Trial
May 19, 2017
Dr Richard J. Willke on the Value of Real-World Data for Health Plans
May 18, 2017
Dr Lou Garrison on the Discussions Surrounding Outcomes-Based Arrangements
May 17, 2017

Dr Jacqueline Glover: Financial Knowledge Is Part of Informed Consent

Informed consent is one of the principal values in healthcare, but it should include discussions about cost, said Jacqueline Glover, PhD, professor in the Department of Pediatrics and the Center for Bioethics and Humanities at the University of Colorado Denver. Glover also discussed the need to clarify the language surrounding end-of-life care.


Informed consent is one of the principal values in healthcare, but it should include discussions about cost, said Jacqueline Glover, PhD, professor in the Department of Pediatrics and the Center for Bioethics and Humanities at the University of Colorado Denver. Glover also discussed the need to clarify the language surrounding end-of-life care.

Transcript (slightly modified)

Where do values from different stakeholders overlap from an ethics perspective?

I think all different stakeholders, whether its healthcare professionals, patients, families, communities, companies, society, we all share the values of transparency and truthfulness, respecting choice within certain parameters, increasing well-being, decreasing risks, and allocating fairly. I think the least controversial overlap, and the place we should begin, is with informed consent.

On the individual level, physicians and other providers should normalize that cost is part of informed consent. If they don’t have the information about cost, they should normalize the discussion and have information about how a patient could get the exact numbers. One of our hospitals, a small hospital, has the practice of a designated oncology pharmacist. That person looks up for each individual patient, what would their out-of-pocket cost be.

I think that’s the kind of thing that we should do. Not necessarily the physician, but the physician has to normalize that discussion. It’s okay to have concerns about cost, and here’s information that can help you make decisions based on cost. It’s hard to scale, it’s a very small hospital, and having an oncologist to look up your individual out-of-pocket cost, that’s hard to scale.

But I think the least controversial is to provide information to patients who may want to say, “Oh, I didn’t realize that the benefit was only a chance at 3 more months for $150,000. I can’t afford that, and I don’t want to burden my family with that after I’m dead.” I think that’s the least controversial.

We tend to use very revealing language. We talk about withdrawing care, and we never withdraw care; we withdraw treatments or we don’t start treatments or interventions. People are afraid that if they didn’t do the next drug, the next innovative thing, that they don’t know what would happen. They would have nothing. They said, “your choice is either do this drug or have nothing.” Well, that’s not true.

As one participant said, if we had palliative care discussions alongside of discussions more frequently, patients could realize that it’s not necessarily all or nothing. It’s this or palliative care and hospice care. We never withdraw care. We just shift the emphasis on care to trying for that additional 3 months versus keeping a person comfortable and doing the things that are necessary at the end of life.

 
Copyright AJMC 2006-2017 Clinical Care Targeted Communications Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
x
Welcome the the new and improved AJMC.com, the premier managed market network. Tell us about yourself so that we can serve you better.
Sign Up
×

Sign In

Not a member? Sign up now!