Currently Viewing:
AMCP 2017
Dr Jennifer Graff on How Payers Make Decisions
August 01, 2017
Laura Topor Discusses Challenges of e-Prescribing Specialty Medications
July 11, 2017
Dr Jacqueline Glover: Financial Knowledge Is Part of Informed Consent
July 10, 2017
Laura Topor Explains the Value of Real-Time Benefit Transactions
June 27, 2017
Dr Jacqueline Glover: Clinicians' Obligations of Justice Regarding Costs of Care
June 24, 2017
Dr Lou Garrison Discusses Challenges of Working With Real-World Data
June 16, 2017
Dr Neil Minkoff Explains How 340B Impacts Pharmacies and Payers Differently
June 15, 2017
Dr Matthew Pickering on Working With Health Plans on Measure Implementation
June 09, 2017
Laura Topor: Clearing Up Misconceptions About e-Prescribing
June 07, 2017
Dr Jacqueline Glover Discusses the Complicated Balance of Ethics in Drug Trials
June 05, 2017
Dr Richard J. Willke Discusses Challenges of Working With Real-World Data
June 02, 2017
Susan A. Cantrell Explains the Necessity of Pre- and Post-Approval Communications
May 31, 2017
Dr Neil Minkoff Discusses Evolution and Consequences of 340B Programs
May 30, 2017
Dr Doug Hillblom Discusses Legislative Pushes Toward e-Prescribing
May 25, 2017
Dr Matthew Pickering Describes Challenges of New Measure Implementation
May 24, 2017
Dr Aimee Tharaldson Discusses the Orphan Drug Approval Trend
May 22, 2017
Dr Gail Bridges on the Importance of Real-World Results Matching Clinical Trial Outcomes
May 21, 2017
Dr Liz Zhou Discusses Real-World Implications of Toujeo Switching Trial
May 19, 2017
Currently Reading
Dr Richard J. Willke on the Value of Real-World Data for Health Plans
May 18, 2017

Dr Richard J. Willke on the Value of Real-World Data for Health Plans

According to Richard J. Willke, PhD, chief science officer of ISPOR, real-world data has some unique advantages over randomized clinical trial findings, especially for health plans looking to make coverage decisions.


According to Richard J. Willke, PhD, chief science officer of ISPOR, real-world data has some unique advantages over randomized clinical trial findings, especially for health plans looking to make coverage decisions.

Transcript (slightly modified)

In what ways can real-world data provide better information for decision making than classical clinical trials?

I would say real-world data should be viewed as complimentary to randomized clinical trial, or RCT, data. RCT data are still the gold standard for determining treatment safety and efficacy of course, but we also know that they’re typically performed in restricted settings and restricted populations, which probably aren’t like the health plan characteristics. So the health plans want to track how the treatment really does in its own population.

One of the first things it looks at is often at adherence, because it’s easy to measure, and then analyze the association with outcomes and probably medical costs. It can also look treatments of populations, 1 treatment versus other comparators, things that were never studied in randomized clinical trials. Now, this has to be done carefully, because the real-world data weren’t randomized, so good methodology is really important. But if it’s done carefully, it can aid health plans in decision making about utilization management, step audits, co-pays, prior authorization: the kind of things that help the health plan optimize one treatment as it fits with other treatments.

 
Copyright AJMC 2006-2017 Clinical Care Targeted Communications Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
x
Welcome the the new and improved AJMC.com, the premier managed market network. Tell us about yourself so that we can serve you better.
Sign Up
×

Sign In

Not a member? Sign up now!