The use of biomarkers in immunotherapy has some technical and biological limitations, and is complicated further by the qualitative aspect of cancer treatment, said David Fabrizio, of Foundation Medicine, Inc. A genomic-based solution could help develop more unified quantitative approaches.
The use of biomarkers in immunotherapy has some technical and biological limitations, and is complicated further by the qualitative aspect of cancer treatment, said David Fabrizio, of Foundation Medicine, Inc. A genomic-based solution could help develop more unified quantitative approaches.
Transcript (slightly modified)
Does biomarker-driven treatment remain a challenge with checkpoint inhibitors?
Yes, absolutely. I think a resounding absolutely. Our first crack at biomarkers in immunotherapy has been protein-based expression and immunohistochemistry staining, and although this does have clinical utility, there are quite a number of limitations associated with that. Some of those limitations are explained by technical aspects of that assay and biological limitations of simply looking at protein-based expression.
But I think at the end of the day, what it comes down to is that the score that you determine based on that type of assay, there’s always a human element associated with that, so there’s a qualitative aspect to it. That qualitative aspect of determining percent positivity, essentially, makes it difficult to adopt as sort of standard best practice. I think, because of that, we need more unified quantitative approaches.
We see the solution there as a genomic-based solution, and so we’ve done that through the emergence of a biomarker we call tumor mutational burden or TMB, which is really just a measure of the number of somatic mutations that exist in a patient’s cancer genome. And we’ve shown, across a number of indications actually, that TMB has quite effective clinical utility at stratifying those who actually benefit, respond, and survive longer versus those who don’t.
Overcoming Employment Barriers for Lasting Social Impact: Freedom House 2.0 and Pathways to Work
April 16th 2024To help celebrate and recognize National Minority Health Month, we are bringing you a special month-long podcast series with our Strategic Alliance Partner, UPMC Health Plan. Welcome to our second episode, in which we learn all about Freedom House 2.0 and the Pathways to Work program.
Listen
Beyond Insulin: The Impact of Next-Generation Diabetes Technology
April 17th 2024Experts explain how new diabetes technologies like continuous glucose monitors are transforming care beyond intensive insulin therapy, offering personalized insights and improving outcomes for patients of all treatment levels.
Read More
Making Giant Strides in Maternity Health Through Baby Steps
April 9th 2024To help celebrate and recognize National Minority Health Month, we are kicking off a special month-long podcast series with our strategic alliance partner, UPMC Health Plan. Welcome to our first episode, which is all about the Baby Steps Maternity Program and its mission to support women throughout every step of their pregnancy journey.
Listen
Dr Michael Farwell on FDG PET/CT Imaging to Predict Immunotherapy Response in Advanced Melanoma
April 15th 2024Michael Farwell, MD, associate professor of radiology at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, provides insights into a study on the benefits of using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT imaging to detect metabolic tumor changes in skin cancer.
Read More