Converting to for-profit status has a positive influence on a hospital's finances, but no effect on quality or mortality rates, found researchers from the Harvard School of Public Health and Brigham and Women's Hospital.
Converting to for-profit status has a positive influence on a hospital’s finances, but no effect on quality or mortality rates. The switch does not reduce the proportion of poor or minority patients receiving care, found researchers from the Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH) and Brigham and Women’s Hospital.
The authors studied 237 hospitals that converted from nonprofit to for-profit status between 2003 and 2007, most of which were small or medium in size and located in the south. The study was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
“Critics of for-profit hospitals have argued that they are worse at providing good care to patients and that therefore we should limit them,” Ashish Jha, professor of health policy and management at HSPH and senior author of the study, said in a statement. “Over the past decade, hundreds of hospitals have switched from being nonprofit to for-profit. Our study finds that if the public health goal is to improve hospital care, then focusing on things like for-profit or nonprofit status is a distraction.”
Hospitals that decided to make the conversion were struggling financially before the switch, with negative total margins. Switching status was associated with improved financial health, although it had no relationship to the quality of care provided. The authors found no clear reason for the improvement in total and operating margins; however, they speculated financial gains likely came through cost-cutting or better payment through private payers.
Despite arguments that converting to a for-profit hospital leads to better care, the authors found no support for such a claim.
However, the researchers point out that their findings differ from prior studies on hospitals that converted in the late 1980s and 1990s. Those studies found that after switching to for-profit status, hospitals typically had higher profitability, but also higher mortality rates and lower staffing.
“While issues like profit status get a lot of attention, we really need to focus our efforts on the much more important issue of why some hospitals provide good care while so many others don’t—irrespective of their ownership status,” Jha said.
Standard Criteria for Loss of Ambulation Needed in DMD
April 19th 2024A recent study suggests the differences between ambulation definitions for patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) can impact the identification of ambulant vs nonambulant individuals, and standard criteria across settings are needed.
Read More
Overcoming Employment Barriers for Lasting Social Impact: Freedom House 2.0 and Pathways to Work
April 16th 2024To help celebrate and recognize National Minority Health Month, we are bringing you a special month-long podcast series with our Strategic Alliance Partner, UPMC Health Plan. Welcome to our second episode, in which we learn all about Freedom House 2.0 and the Pathways to Work program.
Listen
Early Involvement Critical in Treating Immunotherapy-Induced Overlap Syndrome
April 19th 2024A series of case studies reveals the importance of early diagnosis and involvement of special teams of clinicians when dealing with potential cases of overlap syndrome, which encompasses myocarditis, myasthenia gravis, and immune checkpoint inhibitor–related myositis.
Read More
Making Giant Strides in Maternity Health Through Baby Steps
April 9th 2024To help celebrate and recognize National Minority Health Month, we are kicking off a special month-long podcast series with our strategic alliance partner, UPMC Health Plan. Welcome to our first episode, which is all about the Baby Steps Maternity Program and its mission to support women throughout every step of their pregnancy journey.
Listen