• Center on Health Equity and Access
  • Clinical
  • Health Care Cost
  • Health Care Delivery
  • Insurance
  • Policy
  • Technology
  • Value-Based Care

Reimbursement Reform Successfully Reduced Preventable Conditions

Article

Researchers at Stanford University found that when CMS stopped paying for 2 preventable, hospital-acquired conditions in particular, the incidence of the conditions dropped 35% in the Medicare population.

Efforts to reduce preventable, hospital-acquired conditions have been working. At the beginning of December, HHS released a report that found these adverse events had decreased by 17% over 3 years, and CMS recently announced that more than 700 hospitals would be penalized because of their poor performance with hospital-acquired conditions.

Researchers at Stanford University have found that when CMS stopped paying the additional cost of treating the preventable, hospital-acquired conditions pulmonary embolism and deep-vein thrombosis, the incidence of these conditions after hip or knee replacement surgery dropped 35% in the Medicare population.

“We have a win-win. We have patients who are avoiding adverse events while Medicare saves money,” lead author Risha Gidwani, DrPH, a consulting assistant professor of medicine at Stanford and a health economist at the Veterans Affairs Health Economics Resource Center in Menlo Park, said in a statement.

While they did find that the incidence of these 2 conditions increased among the younger, non-Medicare population, they did decrease among patients older than age 65 who had private insurers.

The authors examined records from 2007-2006 from a national database of hospital discharges and compared Medicare patients ages 65-69 years who received hip or knee replacements with non-Medicare patients ages 60-64 who also received these procedures.

Overall, the reimbursement reform worked, according to Gidwani, who said the results of the study are important for payers considering expanding value-based purchasing programs.

“It may seem obvious that Medicare should use payment incentives for providers to encourage better and more appropriate care for patients, but there is always a risk of unintended consequences when Medicare cuts payments for services,” Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD, professor of medicine and director of the Stanford Program on Medical Outcomes and co-author, said. “In this case, we have found evidence that Medicare’s refusal to pay for complications arising from hip and knee surgeries really did reduce the incidence of those complications.”

Related Videos
Carrie Kozlowski
Carrie Kozlowski, OT, MBA
Carrie Kozlowski, OT, MBA
kimberly westrich
Bruce Sherman, MD
Dr Jeffrey Sippel
Lalan Wilfongd, MD, US Oncology Network
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences
AJMC®
All rights reserved.