The use of a tiered network was associated with the increased use of hospitals on the preferred and middle tiers for planned hospital admissions compared with the nonpreferred tier, according to a paper in Health Services Research.
The use of a tiered network was associated with the increased use of hospitals on the preferred and middle tiers for planned hospital admissions compared with the nonpreferred tier, according to a paper in Health Services Research.
Tiered network health plans are being used to steer employees to lower-priced, higher-quality care providers. For members in these plans, their cost-sharing is lowest when they choose providers from the preferred tier, and increases if they use the middle or nonpreferred tiers.
“Tiered hospital networks could potentially offer great savings for employers, given the high costs and price variation associated with hospital services,” according to the Commonwealth Fund, which funded the Harvard University investigators.
The researchers, including Michael E. Chernew, PhD, co-editor-in-chief of The American Journal of Managed Care, evaluated the effect of a tiered network on hospital choice for scheduled admissions by analyzing 2009-2012 patient-level claims data from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts (BCBSMA).
The average cost-sharing for each hospital admission at nonpreferred hospitals was $1070 compared with $360 for hospitals in the middle tier and $170 for hospitals for preferred hospitals.
Over the course of the study period, nearly half (44%) of hospitals changed tiers, mostly from middle to preferred, based on changes in cost of quality performance and nearly all because the hospitals had decreased their prices.
The researchers found that members in tiered networks were more likely than those in nontiered plans to receive care at preferred or middle-tier hospitals. Furthermore, they reported that if all members were in a tiered-network plan that planned hospital admissions to hospitals in a nonpreferred tier would drop 7.6 percentage points. Conversely, admissions to hospitals in the middle and preferred tier hospitals would increase by 0.9 and 6.6 percentage points, respectively.
However, the authors still warned that there are drawbacks to tiered networks, such as transferring risk to patients in the form of higher out-of-pocket payments for lower-tiered providers.
Reducing Low-Value Care Is Hard, but What About Just Not Paying for It?
March 14th 2024After years of efforts to reduce low-value care, panelists at the 2024 Value-Based Insurance Design Summit proposed a new strategy: drawing a line in the sand that payers will not be on the hook for these services.
Read More
Oncology Onward: A Conversation With Penn Medicine's Dr Justin Bekelman
December 19th 2023Justin Bekelman, MD, director of the Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, sat with our hosts Emeline Aviki, MD, MBA, and Stephen Schleicher, MD, MBA, for our final episode of 2023 to discuss the importance of collaboration between academic medicine and community oncology and testing innovative cancer care delivery in these settings.
Listen
Fragmented Payer System, Vulnerable Supply Chain Among Threats to Accessing Essential Medicines
March 13th 2024During a session of the 2024 V-BID Summit, panelists Stacie Dusetzina, PhD, and Inma Hernandez, PharmD, PhD, discussed how access to essential medications is curtailed not just by the longstanding complexities of insurance design but also by emerging threats such as supply chain weaknesses and cyberattacks.
Read More
An appeals court rules against the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America in a 340B contract pharmacy dispute; for-profit investors’ acquisition of nursing homes has raised concerns about the quality of care provided in these facilities; President Joe Biden’s proposed budget for 2025 includes changes that would do away with the current system of biosimilar interchangeability.
Read More