The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)’s Value in Cancer Care Task Force has published an updated value framework that can help clinicians and patients assess the relative value of cancer therapies that have been compared in clinical trials.
The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)’s Value in Cancer Care Task Force has published an updated value framework that can help clinicians and patients assess the relative value of cancer therapies that have been compared in clinical trials.
The conceptual framework, published last year right after ASCO’s annual meeting, was aimed at easing the shared decision-making process for patients and oncologists as they weigh the numerous treatment options available to them. ASCO claims that its framework incorporates elements of clinics benefit, toxicity, and symptom palliation—all drawn from clinical trial data—to develop a net health benefit (NHB) score. Patients are also provided information on the cost of the regimens to help understand the financial impact of their treatment.
The revised framework, published today in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, defines value as a combination of clinical benefit, side effects, and improvement in patient symptoms or quality of life in the context of cost, according to an associated press release. The current updates are based on the feedback that ASCO received—from patients, patient advocates, physicians, representatives of the pharmaceutical industry, and other members of the cancer community—during a 60-day comment period following the release of the value framework.
The following are the major changes to the framework:
Speaking with Evidence-Based Oncology, ASCO’s CMO Richard Schilsky, MD, FACP, FASCO, said, “What we are planning to do later this year is to develop a software application that incorporates all the elements of the Value Framework into an easy-to-use software that can be used on a laptop or a tablet at the point of care, where doctors can actually use it to engage patients in a conversation [around value].” According to the press release, ASCO will work closely with stakeholders, particularly patient advocates, to help ensure that the tool fully considers the needs and preferences of patients. Once it is developed, physicians will be provided with educational resources so that they can best apply the tool in their discussions with patients.
Reference
Schnipper LE, Davidson NE, Wollins DS, et al. Updating the American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework: revisions and reflections in response to comments received [published online May 31, 2016]. J Clin Oncol. doi:10.1200/JCO.2016.68.2518.
Lack of Mutations Associated With Favorable Prognosis in MPN-U
April 25th 2024While the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System and bone marrow blasts may predict overall survival, the lack of certain mutations is also associated with a better prognosis for myeloproliferative neoplasm, unclassifiable (MPN-U).
Read More
Examining Low-Value Cancer Care Trends Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic
April 25th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the authors of a study published in the April 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® about their findings on the rates of low-value cancer care services throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
Listen
HOPE-CAT Can Identify Maternal Cardiovascular Risk 2 Months Earlier Than Doctors, Study Says
April 25th 2024In a retrospective study, the machine learning tool was able to screen for potential risks of cardiovascular disease nearly 60 days before the patient's medical record showed any signs of a related condition or before they were officially diagnosed or treated for it.
Read More
Data Back Neoadjuvant Combo vs Chemo Alone for Early-Stage NSCLC
April 24th 2024For patients with early-stage non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), combining neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors and platinum-based chemotherapy improves 2-year outcomes over chemotherapy alone, suggest findings of an extensive literature review and meta-analysis.
Read More