CMS Tuesday released a report detailing racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in the quality of care received by Medicare Advantage beneficiaries (MA) between 2015 and 2016. CMS said it was releasing the report in recognition of National Minority Health Month, with the aim of raising awareness of health disparities, develop interventions for racially and ethnically diverse Medicare beneficiaries, and implement quality improvement efforts that improve health equity.
CMS Tuesday released a report detailing racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in the quality of care received by Medicare Advantage (MA) beneficiaries between 2015-2016. CMS said it was releasing the report in recognition of National Minority Health Month, with the aim of raising awareness of health disparities, develop interventions for racially and ethnically diverse Medicare beneficiaries, and implement quality improvement efforts that improve health equity.
The report looked at 27 clinical care measures and 8 patient experience measures. Clinical care describes the extent to which patients receive appropriate screening and treatment for specific health conditions, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and diabetes.
Patient experience included such things as how easy it is to get needed care, how well doctors communicate with beneficiaries, and how easy it is for beneficiaries to get information from their drug plans about prescription drug coverage and cost.
In 2016, nearly 70% of all MA beneficiaries were whites, 13% were Hispanic, 10.4% were black, 4.1% were Asians or Pacific Islanders, and 0.4% were American Indians or Alaska Natives. About 2.5% were defined as multiracial but were not included in the report. By gender, 56.3% were female and 43.7% were male. Racial and ethnic disparities were more variable for the clinical care measures than for the patient experience measures.
Hispanic beneficiaries received worse clinical care than white beneficiaries for 11 of 27 measures:
Hispanics received care of similar quality for 10 measures and better quality for 6 measures.
Black beneficiaries received worse clinical care than whites for 8 measures:
Blacks received care of similar quality for 16 measures and better quality for 3 measures than whites. Asian or Pacific Islander beneficiaries received worse clinical care than whites for 3 measures, but received care of similar quality for 13 measures and better quality for 11 measures.
By gender, the quality of care received by women and men was similar. Women and men reported similar experiences of care for all 8 measures of patient experience. Patterns of racial and ethnic differences in patient experience were generally similar among women and men. Among both women and men, Asian and Pacific Islander beneficiaries reported worse experiences than whites beneficiaries for 7 measures and better experiences for 1 measure.
Among women, black beneficiaries reported worse patient experiences than white beneficiaries for 2 measures and similar experiences for 6 measures; among men, black beneficiaries reported worse patient experiences than white beneficiaries for 4 measures and similar experiences for 4 measures.
Among women, Hispanic beneficiaries reported worse patient experiences than white beneficiaries for 3 measures and similar experiences for 5 measures; among men, Hispanic beneficiaries reported worse experiences than white beneficiaries for 4 measures and similar experiences for 4 measures.
The report, Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in Health Care in Medicare Advantage, was created with the Rand Corporation. It was based on an analysis of the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set and the Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey.
Empowering Community Health Through Wellness and Faith
April 23rd 2024To help celebrate and recognize National Minority Health Month, we are bringing you a special month-long podcast series with our Strategic Alliance Partner, UPMC Health Plan. In the third episode, Camille Clarke-Smith, EdD, MS, CHES, CPT, discusses approaching community health holistically through spiritual and community engagement.
Listen
Data Back Neoadjuvant Combo vs Chemo Alone for Early-Stage NSCLC
April 24th 2024For patients with early-stage non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), combining neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors and platinum-based chemotherapy improves 2-year outcomes over chemotherapy alone, suggest findings of an extensive literature review and meta-analysis.
Read More
Overcoming Employment Barriers for Lasting Social Impact: Freedom House 2.0 and Pathways to Work
April 16th 2024To help celebrate and recognize National Minority Health Month, we are bringing you a special month-long podcast series with our Strategic Alliance Partner, UPMC Health Plan. Welcome to our second episode, in which we learn all about Freedom House 2.0 and the Pathways to Work program.
Listen
Patient Navigation in Oncology at Heart of Priority Health White House Visit
April 24th 2024On March 27, Priority Health's president and CEO, Praveen Thadani participated in a discussion on how to expand and optimize patient navigation services in oncology care, as part of the Cancer Moonshot initiative.
Read More