Oral anticancer agents are being launched at significantly higher prices compared with a decade ago, which can prove a barrier to patient access, according to a new analysis published in JAMA Oncology.
Oral anticancer agents are being launched at significantly higher prices compared with a decade ago, which can prove a barrier to patient access despite the ease of using them, according to a new analysis published in JAMA Oncology.
Claims data on orally-administered outpatient prescription drugs, from TruvenHealth MarketScan, was gathered between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2014. Claims for less than $0 or more than $250,000 were excluded from the analysis. A total of 483,587 claims, for a single month of therapy, were included. The claims amount was estimated from the mean per-fill payments to the pharmacy for a single month of supply per product.
The study found that while oral drugs approved in 2000 cost about $1869 per month, those approved in 2014 cost an average of $11,325. There’s also been a steady rise in the price of older drugs over time. Imatinib (Gleevec) has seen an average annual increase in price of about 7.5%. Between 2001 and 2014, the price of Gleevec rose from $3346 per month to $8479 per month. This, in addition to the price variation across nations, just adds to the woes. While Gleevec costs about $106,322 per year in the United States, the generic version of the drug, available in Brazil, costs 18 times less ($8000).
Speaking with Boston’s WBUR, Peter Bach, MD, MAPP, director of the Center for Health Policy and Outcomes, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, said, “The rate of rise exceeds the rise in benefits from these drugs. This is a ginned-up pricing structure that isn’t a product of careful analysis. It’s not a bunch of guys in green eye-shades but a bit of dart-throwing and chutzpah. And if there’s a critical Op Ed piece or a Twitter avalanche [in response to a high price] they’ll lower it.”
“The major trend here is that these products are just getting more expensive over time,” according to study author Stacie Dusetzina, PhD, assistant professor, University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy and Gillings School of Global Public Health.
While commercial plans have usually provided generous coverage for oral anticancer agents, the growing prices of these specialty agents has resulted in a cost-shift toward the patient, with rising deductibles and co-insurance payments.
An important limitation of the data set used in the study is the absence of Medicare and Medicaid data. Additionally, products dispensed and reimbursed by commercial health plans alone were included, which leaves out infrequently used or newly approved agents.
Reference
Dusetzina SB. Drug pricing trends for orally administered anticancer medications reimbursed by commercial health plans, 2000-2014 [published online April 28, 2016]. JAMA Oncol. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0648.
HOPE-CAT Can Identify Maternal Cardiovascular Risk 2 Months Earlier Than Doctors, Study Says
April 25th 2024In a retrospective study, the machine learning tool was able to screen for potential risks of cardiovascular disease nearly 60 days before the patient's medical record showed any signs of a related condition or before they were officially diagnosed or treated for it.
Read More
Examining Low-Value Cancer Care Trends Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic
April 25th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the authors of a study published in the April 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® about their findings on the rates of low-value cancer care services throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
Listen
Navigating Health Policy in an Election Year: Insights From Dr Dennis Scanlon
April 2nd 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with Dennis Scanlon, PhD, the editor in chief of The American Journal of Accountable Care®, about prior authorization, price transparency, the impact of health policy on the upcoming election, and more.
Listen
Data Back Neoadjuvant Combo vs Chemo Alone for Early-Stage NSCLC
April 24th 2024For patients with early-stage non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), combining neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors and platinum-based chemotherapy improves 2-year outcomes over chemotherapy alone, suggest findings of an extensive literature review and meta-analysis.
Read More