Currently Viewing:
Newsroom
Currently Reading
Bone Marrow Environment in Patients With RA May Promote Inflammation
December 12, 2017 – Kelly Davio
Researchers Say Medicare Advantage Plans Need Better Incentives to Meet Future Demand
December 12, 2017 – Allison Inserro
University, Genetics Firm Find Link Between ADHD, Delay Discounting
December 12, 2017 – Allison Inserro
Welltok Identifies Who's at Risk for Getting and Spreading the Flu
December 12, 2017 – Jaime Rosenberg
What We're Reading: Medical Device Approval; Medical Laboratories Sue Government; ACA Sign-Up Deadline
December 12, 2017 – AJMC Staff
What's the Magic Payment Mix for Medicare Primary Care Providers?
December 11, 2017 – Allison Inserro
Racial Disparities Prevalent in Survival of Patients With Ovarian, Colon, and Breast Cancer
December 11, 2017 – Jaime Rosenberg
Sanofi's Insulin Lispro Follow-On, Admelog, Wins FDA Approval
December 11, 2017 – Mary Caffrey
The Past, Present, and Future of HIV Funding
December 11, 2017 – Jaime Rosenberg

Geographic Gaps in BRCA Testing Rates Have Narrowed

Christina Mattina
In recent years, testing for the BRCA1/2 gene mutations has increased among women in both metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas, helping to drastically reduce the gap in testing rates between the groups.
In recent years, testing for the BRCA1/2 gene mutations has increased among women in both metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas, helping to drastically reduce the gap in testing rates between the groups.

A new CDC Surveillance Summary presents the rates of BRCA testing from 2009 to 2013 among women aged 18 to 64 with employer-sponsored health insurance. Specifically, it compares metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas in terms of their rates of testing, as well as the receipt of preventive interventions and genetic counseling after getting the test.

Testing for BRCA mutations has been identified as a method for earlier detection or prevention of cancer through enhanced screenings and preventive surgeries. BRCA status can also help guide treatment decisions for women diagnosed with cancer. Although organizations like the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommend testing for women who could benefit based on family history, little research exists on how rates of testing may vary nationwide.

For the Surveillance Summary, the researchers used a commercial claims database to compare rates of testing, preventive interventions, and genetic testing over time and by census region. In each year, the number of women included in the database ranged from 15 to 20 million.

From 2009 to 2014, BRCA testing rates increased 2.3-fold in metropolitan areas and 3-fold in nonmetropolitan ones. In 2009, the relative difference in testing rates between the 2 areas had been 36.9%, but by 2014 it had decreased by nearly half to 19.6%. Still, urban women were more likely to receive the test than their rural counterparts during each year, for all test subgroups and across all age groups.

Rates of mastectomy after BRCA testing were comparable among the urban and rural areas, but women in metropolitan areas were generally more likely to receive genetic counseling or a breast magnetic responance imaging after the test.

The study authors noted that the lower rates of testing and follow-up in nonmetropolitan areas could reflect difficulties in accessing specialists like genetic counselors. However, the patterns of increasing testing rates over time in rural areas may indicate that more women began to seek genetic testing and counseling from their primary care providers. This may have been encouraged by the 2013 recommendation from the USPSTF that trained providers should provide counseling about BRCA testing to at-risk women.

Despite the limitation that the study’s focus on commercially-insured women may have overestimated testing rates, the researchers wrote that the data provide a useful starting point for public health officials looking to monitor patterns in BRCA testing and follow-up rates. These trends can be used to inform interventions targeting certain women, such as those in nonmetropolitan areas.

“Programs can build on the recent decrease in geographic disparities in receipt of BRCA testing while simultaneously educating the public and health care providers about [USPSTF] recommendations and other clinical guidelines for BRCA testing and counseling,” the study authors concluded.

 
Copyright AJMC 2006-2017 Clinical Care Targeted Communications Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
x
Welcome the the new and improved AJMC.com, the premier managed market network. Tell us about yourself so that we can serve you better.
Sign Up
×

Sign In

Not a member? Sign up now!