Republican Congressional Committee members question MACPAC leadership’s conflicts of interest.
Republicans on the House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee are raising questions about the selection process for members of the Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission (MACPAC) commission, which recommends Medicaid policy to Congress, and expressed concerns that “there may be conflicts of interest on the panel of experts that is supposed to be independent.”
Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI) and Health Subcommittee Chairman Joe Pitts (R-PA) wrote letters to the Comptroller General of the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) and the leaders of MACPAC saying that MACPAC does not have a “sufficient” conflict of interest policy and that they had concerns about the way the head of the GAO selects new commissioners.
“Without a balance of commissioners and a robust conflict of interest policy, we believe MACPAC’s recommendations will lack a needed level of independence and integrity,” the letter to MACPAC stated.
The letter to the GAO head said the Congressmen wanted to better understand GAO’s process and methodology for evaluating candidates and making appointments to MACPAC, and included a request for what steps GAO has taken to comply with the requirement for public disclosure by members of MACPAC of financial and other potential conflicts of interest relating to such members.
The letter to GAO’s head also asked if GAO examines or evaluates “the degree to which candidates have participated in advocacy or political activity that could result in a perceived or real conflict of interest and thus compromise the independence and integrity of MACPAC recommendations.” The committee members said they are not aware of any required disclosure or recusal process at MACPAC related to a commissioner’s political activity or advocacy.
The Congressmen’s letter said they found it to be a significant conflict of interest that newly appointed chair of MACPAC, Sara Rosenbaum, has joined an amicus brief in support of the administration against the US House of Representatives in a lawsuit filed against the White House. The lawsuit claims that the administration violated the law by creating subsidies under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) that were not specifically appropriated by Congress.
The Republican committee members are concerned that they are not getting the kinds of robust, independent analyses from MACPAC on issues concerning Medicaid that helps them properly oversee the program and make changes when needed.
Empowering Community Health Through Wellness and Faith
April 23rd 2024To help celebrate and recognize National Minority Health Month, we are bringing you a special month-long podcast series with our Strategic Alliance Partner, UPMC Health Plan. In the third episode, Camille Clarke-Smith, EdD, MS, CHES, CPT, discusses approaching community health holistically through spiritual and community engagement.
Listen
Data Back Neoadjuvant Combo vs Chemo Alone for Early-Stage NSCLC
April 24th 2024For patients with early-stage non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), combining neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors and platinum-based chemotherapy improves 2-year outcomes over chemotherapy alone, suggest findings of an extensive literature review and meta-analysis.
Read More
Overcoming Employment Barriers for Lasting Social Impact: Freedom House 2.0 and Pathways to Work
April 16th 2024To help celebrate and recognize National Minority Health Month, we are bringing you a special month-long podcast series with our Strategic Alliance Partner, UPMC Health Plan. Welcome to our second episode, in which we learn all about Freedom House 2.0 and the Pathways to Work program.
Listen
Patient Navigation in Oncology at Heart of Priority Health White House Visit
April 24th 2024On March 27, Priority Health's president and CEO, Praveen Thadani participated in a discussion on how to expand and optimize patient navigation services in oncology care, as part of the Cancer Moonshot initiative.
Read More