A newly released poll by Morning Consult/Politico finds that 51% of Americans surveyed support the idea of requiring individuals to work in order to be eligible for Medicaid.
A newly released poll by Morning Consult/Politico finds that 51% of Americans surveyed support the idea of requiring individuals to work in order to be eligible for Medicaid.
The survey of nearly 2000 registered voters was conducted between August 10th and 14th. Among the dozens of questions on political opinions was a prompt that asked whether respondents support or oppose requiring Medicaid enrollees to have a job to be eligible for the program.
Of the total sample of 1997 voters, 51% supported such requirements (24% strongly and 27% somewhat), while 37% opposed them (19% strongly and 18% somewhat). The remaining 13% were not sure or had no opinion. Further breakdowns by respondent demographic groups revealed that opinions seemed to be correlated with political leaning and their approval of the President.
Respondents who strongly approve of the job Donald Trump is doing as President were the group with the highest rates of strong support for Medicaid work requirements, at 43%. In contrast, those who strongly disapprove of the President’s job performance were among the most likely to strongly oppose work requirements, as 30% of them did. Slightly higher rates of strong opposition were observed among unemployed people (33%) and Democratic women (32%).
Morning Consult’s analysis of responses to this question noted that no state currently has work requirements for Medicaid in place. However, since CMS under the Trump administration indicated in a letter that it would be open to work requirements, 4 states have submitted requests for waivers that would allow them to implement such policies. These waivers generally specify that able-bodied Medicaid beneficiaries would need to work a certain number of hours per week or participate in an education, training, or job search program in order to stay eligible for benefits.
A proposed overhaul in Florida, for instance, would require recipients to demonstrate employment or participation in one of the aforementioned programs, as well as impose a small cost-sharing amount of $10 to $15 per month. If individuals do not meet the work requirements or pay the premiums, they would be barred from receiving Medicaid assistance for 12 months.
Observers have raised questions about how many people could potentially be impacted by work requirements, considering the varying exemptions that each state would allow. Florida’s proposal would exempt disabled beneficiaries, minors with children, caretakers of disabled family members, single parents of infants, and those who had worked “diligently” before an extraordinary circumstance made them unable to work. Wisconsin’s waiver proposal would exempt several of those same populations, as well as people with mental illness, those in substance abuse treatment, and high school or college students over age 19.
Drew Altman, president and CEO of the Kaiser Family Foundation, was quoted in the Morning Consult analysis as predicting that “a very small number of people” would feel the impact of work requirements. Instead, the question is “more an ideological debate,” he said.
This ideological debate and its partisan divides were reflected in a Kaiser Health Tracking Poll released this May. In the poll, more than half (52%) of Republicans stated they viewed Medicaid as similar to welfare programs for the poor, like food stamps, while almost three-fourths (73%) of Democrats perceived Medicaid as more like Medicare and other health insurance programs that help people afford healthcare.
Overcoming Employment Barriers for Lasting Social Impact: Freedom House 2.0 and Pathways to Work
April 16th 2024To help celebrate and recognize National Minority Health Month, we are bringing you a special month-long podcast series with our Strategic Alliance Partner, UPMC Health Plan. Welcome to our second episode, in which we learn all about Freedom House 2.0 and the Pathways to Work program.
Listen
Pegcetacoplan for PNH More Cost-Effective Than Anti-C5 Monoclonal Antibodies
April 18th 2024A cost-utility analysis conducted from the perspective of the Italian health system found that pegcetacoplan was more effective and less costly than 2 complement 5 (C5) inhibitors for the treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH).
Read More
Making Giant Strides in Maternity Health Through Baby Steps
April 9th 2024To help celebrate and recognize National Minority Health Month, we are kicking off a special month-long podcast series with our strategic alliance partner, UPMC Health Plan. Welcome to our first episode, which is all about the Baby Steps Maternity Program and its mission to support women throughout every step of their pregnancy journey.
Listen
Collecting SDOH Data Can Assess Risk of Medical Nonadherence, Improve HEI and Star Ratings
April 18th 2024At the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) 2024 annual meeting, a panel of presenters explored changes coming to Medicare that incorporate social determinants of health (SDOH) data to improve patient and health system outcomes.
Read More
Many Patients With Psoriasis in Clinical Trials Experience Nocebo Effects, Study Finds
April 18th 2024Half of patients exposed to placebo in clinical trials experienced adverse events (AEs), which may be partially explainable by nocebo effects, according to a recent review and meta-analysis.
Read More