Savings hospitals had lower baseline spending than nonsavings hospitals during the first year of the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) program, according to a Research Letter in JAMA.
Savings hospitals had lower baseline spending than nonsavings hospitals during the first year of the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) program, according to a Research Letter in JAMA.
Medicare’s CJR program offers bundled payments for hip and knee surgery at 799 hospitals that include payments for hospitalization and post-discharge care 90 days after the procedure into a single benchmark. The program incentivizes hospitals through bonus payments to exceed their quality and cost benchmarks. Overall, 67 urban markets in metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) were required by Medicare to participate in the program.
Recently, Medicare has declared the most hospitals in 34 of 67 MSAs must continue participating in the CJR program, while low-volume hospitals could choose whether to continue or withdraw. The study evaluated Medicare’s change in policy and how it affects the future of mandatory bundled payment models.
The researchers used Medicare data to analyze the proportion, distribution, and quality performance of CJR hospitals that achieved savings during the first year of CJR. This was then compared to the pre-CJR baseline which took place from April 2015 to March 2016. Volume was calculated from 100% Medicare claims from 2015 to 2016.
Of the 799 CJR hospitals, 48% were savings hospitals, and mean episode savings ranged from $13.83 to $3590.97. 92% of the savings hospitals achieved good or exceptional level quality. Generally, savings hospitals had a greater number of hospital beds than nonsavings hospitals and had a greater average annual Medicare joint replacement value.
In addition, savings hospitals were more likely to be nonprofit, teaching, and integrated with a post-acute care facility compared to nonsavings hospitals. Nonsavings hospitals were more frequently considered safety-net hospitals. In terms of evaluating proportion, savings hospitals did not differ between mandatory and voluntary MSAs.
“Nevertheless, these findings suggest that certain hospital types may be better positioned to succeed in mandatory bundled payment compared with others, particularly as policy changes affect the number and composition of hospitals and markets required to participate,” the authors concluded.
References
Navathe AS, Liao JM, Shah Y, et al. Characteristics of hospitals earning savings in the first year of mandatory bundled payment for hip and knee surgery. JAMA. 2018;319(9):930-932. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.0678.
Prices for care at hospital trauma centers vary across hospitals; drug shortages reached a record high during the first quarter of 2024; although 3 of the biggest makers of asthma inhalers pledged to cap out-of-pocket costs for some US patients at $35, these do not apply to daily inhalers used by the youngest kids with asthma.
Read More
Navigating Health Policy in an Election Year: Insights From Dr Dennis Scanlon
April 2nd 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with Dennis Scanlon, PhD, the editor in chief of The American Journal of Accountable Care®, about prior authorization, price transparency, the impact of health policy on the upcoming election, and more.
Listen
The Biden administration recently launched the Global Health Security Strategy, a new effort to combat the spread of infectious diseases; lawmakers zeroed in on the risks of massive consolidation in health care during the first congressional hearing on the Change Healthcare hack; the FDA recently announced the recall of a pair of heart devices linked to numerous deaths and injuries.
Read More
Exploring Medicare Advantage Prior Authorization Variations
March 26th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the authors of a study published in the March 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® about their findings on variations in prior authorization use across Medicare Advantage plans.
Listen