Researchers from MD Anderson Cancer Center found that laparoscopy cost more upfront but eliminated wasteful treatment decisions.
A cost-effective analysis has shown that using laparoscopy to guide the initial treatment plan for patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer is cost-effective for health care payers. Results were published in the journal Gynecologic Oncology.
The analysis was designed to show whether using laparoscopy would be useful in deciding between 2 surgical approaches: the more aggressive primary cytoreduction (PCS) and the less invasive neoadjuvant chemotherapy with interval cytoreduction (NACT), based on the likelihood of complete gross resection.
Researchers from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center used a microsimulation model that included the elements of a more conventional decision making process to compare with laparoscopy. The model included diagnostic work-ups, surgical and adjuvant treatment, complications, and progression-free survival (PFS), with parameters developed based on published literature and investigators’ own data.
Effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted PFS years and tested with a probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA). A willingness-to-pay level was set at $50,000 year per year for each year of quality adjusted PFS.
The laparoscopy cost more upfront but was also more effective in guiding treatment. The average additional cost of $7034 led to an average additional 4.1 months of quality-adjusted PFS. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the procedure was $20,376 per year of PFS, well below the threshold. Using the procedure ahead of treatment decisions helped avoid other serious complications and added costs, and researchers reported that laparoscopy was “cost-effective across a range of willingness-to-pay thresholds.”
The authors concluded, “Performing laparoscopy is a cost-effective way to improve primary treatment planning for patients with untreated advanced ovarian cancer.”
Reference
Harrison RF, Cantor SB, Sun CC, et al. Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic disease assessment in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. Published online January 31, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.01.024.
Study Reveals Link Between Ovarian Cancer, Subsequent Dry Eye Disease Incidence
May 13th 2024Patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer (OC), particularly those older than 60 years or with a disease duration exceeding 5 years, had a higher incidence of subsequent dry eye disease (DED), suggesting a potential correlation between OC and DED.
Read More
BRCA-Like Classification May Be a Useful Biomarker for Olaparib Response in Ovarian Cancer
May 1st 2024Adding olaparib to maintenance therapy with bevacizumab was associated with significantly longer survival for patients with ovarian cancer whose tumors have a BRCA-like genomic profile, but not among those with non-BRCA-like tumors, a study found.
Read More
Downward Morbidity, Mortality Trends Discovered Among Patients With Ovarian Cancer, Liver Metastases
April 24th 2024This study indicates a declining trend in morbidity and mortality rates among patients with ovarian cancer and liver metastases, highlighting the efficacy of surgery and chemotherapy in improving survival outcomes.
Read More
Study Links COVID-19 Pandemic to Rise in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Ovarian Cancer in US
April 17th 2024There was greater use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy among US patients with ovarian cancer (OC) during the COVID-19 pandemic to reduce potential COVID-19 exposure and cancer treatment-related complications.
Read More