Currently Viewing:
The American Journal of Managed Care April 2010
Currently Reading
Estimated Effect of Asthma Case Management Using Propensity Score Methods
Sylvia Brandt, PhD; Sara Gale, MPH; and Ira B. Tager, MD, MPH
Age and Rural Residence Effects on Accessing Colorectal Cancer Treatments: A Registry Study
Jayashri Sankaranarayanan, PhD; Shinobu Watanabe-Galloway, PhD; Junfeng Sun, PhD; Fang Qiu, MS, PhD; Eugene C. Boilesen, BS; and Alan G. Thorson, MD
Low-Value Services in Value-Based Insurance Design
Peter J. Neumann, ScD; Hannah R. Auerbach, BA; Joshua T. Cohen, PhD; and Dan Greenberg, PhD
Pharmacy Cost Sharing, Antiplatelet Therapy Utilization, and Health Outcomes for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome
Tomas J. Philipson, PhD; Essy Mozaffari, PharmD, MPH; and John Ross Maclean, MD
Getting the Right Services Covered by Health Insurance
Dean G. Smith, PhD
Relationship Between High Cost Sharing and Adverse Outcomes: A Truism That's Tough to Prove
Niteesh K. Choudhry, MD, PhD
Knowledge of Cost Sharing and Decisions to Seek Care
Amy M. Lischko, DSc; and James F. Burgess Jr, PhD
Economic Evaluation of an Internet-Based Weight Management Program
Rafia S. Rasu, PhD; Christine M. Hunter, PhD; Alan L. Peterson, PhD; Heather M. Maruska, BSc, PharmD(Cand); and John P. Foreyt, PhD
Health Information Technology and Physicians' Knowledge of Drug Costs
Chien-Wen Tseng, MD, MPH; Robert H. Brook, MD, ScD; G. Caleb Alexander, MD, MS; Allen L. Hixon, MD; Emmett B. Keeler, PhD; Carol M. Mangione, MD, MSPH; Randi Chen, MS; Eric A. Jackson, PharmD; and R. Adams Dudley, MD, MBA
The National Oncology Working Group (NOW) Initiative: Payer and Provider Collaborations in Oncology Benefits Management
Aileen M. Soper, BA; C. E. (Gene) Reeder, RPh, PhD; Loreen M. Brown, MSW; Ana Stojanovska, BS; and Barbara J. Lennert, RN, BSN, MAOM

Estimated Effect of Asthma Case Management Using Propensity Score Methods

Sylvia Brandt, PhD; Sara Gale, MPH; and Ira B. Tager, MD, MPH

An asthma case management program increased preventive care but did not significantly decrease markers of exacerbations.

Objective: To estimate the treatment effect of participation in an asthma intervention that was part of the National  Asthma Control Program.

 

Study Design: Cross-sectional; difference in outcomes between participants and comparable nonparticipants matched by  using propensity scores.

 

Methods: Data on children who participated in asthma case management (n = 270) and eligible children who did not participate in case management (n = 2742) were extracted from a Medicaid claims database. We constructed measures of healthcare utilization, sociodemographics, and neighborhood characteristics. After creating a comparison group similar to the participants in terms of all characteristics before participation, we estimated the effect of the program on asthma outcomes.

 

Results: Participants were more likely to have vaccinations for pulmonary illness (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.82, 4.81), to fill a prescription for controller medications (95% CI = 1.07, 2.19), and to have a refill for rescue medication (95% CI = 1.07, 2.07) after the program than comparable nonparticipants. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of nebulizer treatments or emergency department visits between the 2 groups.

 

Conclusions: The program did increase the use of preventive healthcare by participants. Over the time period we studied, these behaviors did not decrease healthcare utilization for asthma exacerbations. We were unable to discern  whether the lack of effect was because of the nature of the program, heterogeneity of the effects, or barriers outside the program’s control.

 

(Am J Manag Care. 2010;16(4):257-264)



PDF
 
Copyright AJMC 2006-2019 Clinical Care Targeted Communications Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
x
Welcome the the new and improved AJMC.com, the premier managed market network. Tell us about yourself so that we can serve you better.
Sign Up