The American Journal of Managed Care November 2014
Medical Cost Burdens Among Nonelderly Adults With Asthma
In this sense, asthma patients may differ from patients with other chronic diseases, such as hypertension or hyperlipidemia, who do not necessarily face immediate consequences of failing to adhere to treatment. By contrast, asthma patients who do not adhere to treatment face the very real and short-term threat of an asthma attack or other exacerbations, and may therefore place a high priority on maintaining their treatment. These patients might benefit from value-based strategies in which medications recommended for the self-management of chronic illness are offered through extremely generous cost-sharing arrangements. But because cost-sharing interventions are often judged by their effects on healthcare spending and utilization in the targeted clinical areas rather than by their broader health effects or their effects on other areas of a patient’s life, patients’ apparent willingness to continue using medication even in the face of high financial burden may understate the effects of such interventions.
Author Affiliations: Seamless Care Models Group, CMS Innovation Center, CMS, Baltimore, MD (EC); and Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (PC).
Source of Funding: This study was supported by the Commonwealth Fund.
Author Disclosures: Dr Carrier contributed to this research prior to her employment at CMS. Views expressed are the authors' own and do not necessarily represent the opinions or policies of CMS or HHS. Drs Carrier and Cunningham report no conflicts of interest.
Authorship Information: Concept and design (EC, PC); acquisition of data (EC, PC); analysis and interpretation of data (EC, PC); drafting of the manuscript (EC, PC); critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content (EC, PC); statistical revision (EC, PC); obtaining funding (PC); administrative, technical, or logistic support (EC, PC); and supervision (PC).
Address correspondence to: Emily Carrier, MD, Seamless Care Models Group, CMS Innovation Center, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 7500 Security Blvd, WB-15-64, Baltimore, MD 21244. E-mail: Emily.Carrier@cms.hhs.gov.
2. Sokol MC, McGuigan KA, Verbrugge RR, Epstein RS. Impact of medication adherence on hospitalization risk and healthcare cost. Med Care. 2005;43(6):521-530.
3. Rossiter LF, Whitehurst-Cook MY, Small RE, et al. The impact of disease management on outcomes and cost of care: a study of low-income asthma patients. Inquiry. 2000;37(2):188-202.
4. Jowers JR, Schwartz AL,Tinkelman DG, et al. Disease management program improves asthma outcomes. Am J Manag Care. 2000;6(5): 585-592.
5. Tinkelman D, Wilson S. Asthma disease management: regression to the mean or better? Am J Manag Care. 2004;10(12):948-954.
6. Rollins G. Disease management program cuts costs, improves out-comes for Virginia Medicaid. Rep Med Guidel Outcomes Res. 2000; 11(20):6-7.
7. Piette JD, Heisler M, Wagner TH. Cost-related medication underuse among chronically ill adults: the treatments people forgo, how often, and who is at risk. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(10):1782-1787.
8. Kullgren JT, Galbraith AA, Hinrichsen VL, et al. Health care use and decision making among lower-income families in high-deductible health plans. Arch Intern Med. 2010; 170(21):1918-1925.
9. Hoffman C, Schwartz K. Eroding access among nonelderly U.S. adults with chronic conditions: ten years of change. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27(5):w340-w348.
10. Piette JD, Beard A, Rosland AM, McHorney CA. Beliefs that influence cost-related medication non-adherence among the “haves” and “have nots” with chronic diseases. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011;5: 389-396.
11. Cunningham PJ, Carrier ER.Trends in the financial burden of medical care for nonelderly adults with diabetes, 2001-2009. Am J Manag Care. 2014;20(2):135-142.
12. Priority conditions enumeration (PE) section [of AHRQ Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, PE 33]. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality website. http://meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/survey_comp/hc_sur- vey/2008/PE1201.htm. Published December 2008. Accessed June 2013.
13. Banthem J, Bernard D. Changes in financial burdens for healthcare: national estimates for the population younger than 65 years, 1996 to 2003. JAMA. 2006;296(22):2712-2719.
14. Cohen, JW. Design and Methods of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Household Component. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1997.
15. Cohen, SB. Sample Design of the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Household Component. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1997.
16. Cohen, SB. Design strategies and innovations in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Med Care. 2003; 41(7 supp):III5-III12.
17. Zuvekas SH, Olin GL. Validating household reports of health care use in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Health Serv Res. 2009; 44(5, pt 1):1679-1700.
18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Increasing prevalence of diagnosed diabetes--United States and Puerto Rico, 1995-2010. MMWR. 2012;61(45):918-921.
19. Machlin SR, Zodet MW. A methodological comparison of ambulatory health care data collected in two national surveys. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Working Paper No. 07001. http:// meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/workingpapers/wp_07001.pdf. Published October 2007. Accessed June 2013.
20. Hill SC, Zuvekas SH, Zodet MW. Implications of the accuracy of MEPS prescription drug data for health services research. Inquiry. 2011; 48(3):242-259.
21. Sommers A, Cunningham PJ. Medical bill problems steady for U.S. families, 2007-2010.Tracking Report No. 28. http://www.hschange.org/CONTENT/1268. Published December 2011. Accessed August 13, 2013.