Currently Viewing:
The American Journal of Managed Care December 2018
Feasibility of Expanded Emergency Department Screening for Behavioral Health Problems
Mamata Kene, MD, MPH; Christopher Miller Rosales, MS; Sabrina Wood, MS; Adina S. Rauchwerger, MPH; David R. Vinson, MD; and Stacy A. Sterling, DrPH, MSW
Currently Reading
From the Editorial Board: Jonas de Souza, MD, MBA
Jonas de Souza, MD, MBA
Reducing Disparities Requires Multiple Strategies
Melony E. Sorbero, PhD, MS, MPH; Susan M. Paddock, PhD; and Cheryl L. Damberg, PhD
Cost Variation and Savings Opportunities in the Oncology Care Model
James Baumgardner, PhD; Ahva Shahabi, PhD; Christopher Zacker, RPh, PhD; and Darius Lakdawalla, PhD
Patient Attribution: Why the Method Matters
Rozalina G. McCoy, MD, MS; Kari S. Bunkers, MD; Priya Ramar, MPH; Sarah K. Meier, PhD; Lorelle L. Benetti, BA; Robert E. Nesse, MD; and James M. Naessens, ScD, MPH
Patient Experience During a Large Primary Care Practice Transformation Initiative
Kaylyn E. Swankoski, MA; Deborah N. Peikes, PhD, MPA; Nikkilyn Morrison, MPPA; John J. Holland, BS; Nancy Duda, PhD; Nancy A. Clusen, MS; Timothy J. Day, MSPH; and Randall S. Brown, PhD
Relationships Between Provider-Led Health Plans and Quality, Utilization, and Satisfaction
Natasha Parekh, MD, MS; Inmaculada Hernandez, PharmD, PhD; Thomas R. Radomski, MD, MS; and William H. Shrank, MD, MSHS
Primary Care Burnout and Populist Discontent
James O. Breen, MD
Adalimumab Persistence for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Veteran and Insured Cohorts
Shail M. Govani, MD, MSc; Rachel Lipson, MSc; Mohamed Noureldin, MBBS, MSc; Wyndy Wiitala, PhD; Peter D.R. Higgins, MD, PhD, MSc; Sameer D. Saini, MD, MSc; Jacqueline A. Pugh, MD; Dawn I. Velligan, PhD; Ryan W. Stidham, MD, MSc; and Akbar K. Waljee, MD, MSc
The Value of Novel Immuno-Oncology Treatments
John A. Romley, PhD; Andrew Delgado, PharmD; Jinjoo Shim, MS; and Katharine Batt, MD
Medicare Advantage Control of Postacute Costs: Perspectives From Stakeholders
Emily A. Gadbois, PhD; Denise A. Tyler, PhD; Renee R. Shield, PhD; John P. McHugh, PhD; Ulrika Winblad, PhD; Amal Trivedi, MD; and Vincent Mor, PhD
Provider-Owned Insurers in the Individual Market
David H. Howard, PhD; Brad Herring, PhD; John Graves, PhD; and Erin Trish, PhD
Mixed Messages to Consumers From Medicare: Hospital Compare Grades Versus Value-Based Payment Penalty
Jennifer Meddings, MD, MSc; Shawna N. Smith, PhD; Timothy P. Hofer, MD, MSc; Mary A.M. Rogers, PhD, MS; Laura Petersen, MHSA; and Laurence F. McMahon Jr, MD, MPH

From the Editorial Board: Jonas de Souza, MD, MBA

Jonas de Souza, MD, MBA
Value-based care can be loosely defined as care that delivers value to the patient, with a focus on quality rather than on quantity of care. Arguably, the biggest advantage of value-based care is that it holds physicians and payers accountable for quality of care and costs through payment arrangements that involve financial risks and gains for payers and providers. Under this form of value-based payment, providers have opportunities to reap the financial benefits of cost savings but are also at financial risk if cost and quality do not meet agreed-upon targets. Payers can play an important role in helping providers succeed under these arrangements by sharing actionable data and insights that can help providers understand their patient populations and adjust care processes to improve quality.

The current transformation to value-based care must be informed by past efforts to reform healthcare delivery. The managed care backlash of the 1990s resulted from Americans’ concern that they were not receiving all the care they needed because of insurers’ pressure on physicians to keep costs low. Fears were real and widespread even though true incidents of withheld care may have been rare. In the migration to value-based care, the healthcare system will need to assure the public that medical care is not being compromised and, more importantly, that health outcomes are improving under value-based care.

Easier said than done, these initiatives usually require major organization support and transformation for both payers and providers. As an example, starting in 2015, Humana Inc set a goal to streamline its quality program through an internal Clinical Quality Metrics Alignment initiative. The objectives of the initiative were to (1) identify meaningful measures that matter, (2) standardize and align measures internally and with national organizations, and (3) prioritize those measures that have been shown to be linked to improved health outcomes. The list of measures used within Humana shrank from 1100 to 208. Additionally, a new infrastructure was created to provide ongoing oversight and governance so that this work could continue.

The current issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® explores a variety of challenges and opportunities associated with value-based approaches to healthcare delivery and payment. One included article issues a call for real-world evidence that can be used to guide value-oriented initiatives. Other articles document wins and lessons learned through new approaches to care delivery and patient engagement. Another outlines the need for reliable primary care physician attribution methodologies. Two articles explore provider-led health insurance as one way to improve value. Overall, they all emphasize the need for payers and providers to work together toward a common goal of improving the quality of healthcare.

Dr de Souza is a medical director at Humana, Inc. This letter was coauthored by Courtney Brown, PharmD, director of research consulting, and Misty Roberts, MSN, CPHQ, associate vice-president for clinical quality at Humana, Inc.
Copyright AJMC 2006-2020 Clinical Care Targeted Communications Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome the the new and improved, the premier managed market network. Tell us about yourself so that we can serve you better.
Sign Up