Currently Viewing:
Newsroom
Currently Reading
Warning Labels Might Keep Parents From Buying Soda, Study Finds
January 15, 2016 – Mary Caffrey
MedPAC Recommends Congress Cut Part B Reimbursement for 340B Entities
January 14, 2016 – Surabhi Dangi-Garimella, PhD
No Association Found Between DPP-4 Inhibitors and Heart Failure in Review of Claims Data
January 13, 2016 – Mary Caffrey
American Girl Type 1 Diabetes Kit Applauded by Parents, Educators
January 12, 2016 – Mary Caffrey
NIH Awards $2M to Study Long-Term Obesity Intervention in Kids
January 11, 2016 – AJMC Staff
Top Healthcare News: New Dietary Guidelines and Cancer Treatment Advances
January 10, 2016
Should We Tax Unhealthy Foods and Drinks?
January 09, 2016 – Jackie Syrop
Trial Tests Safety of Promising Therapy for Patients With Type 1 Diabetes
January 09, 2016 – Jessica Men
This Week in Managed Care: January 9, 2016
January 09, 2016

Warning Labels Might Keep Parents From Buying Soda, Study Finds

Mary Caffrey
Warning labels on soda might have less consumer resistance than taxes or portion limits, the study found.
Public health officials agree that keeping kids away from sugar-sweetened drinks, especially soda, is one of the keys to tackling high rates of childhood obesity and diabetes. So far, however, efforts to tax drinks or limit portions have had mixed success, with beverage companies and consumers themselves pushing back.

But a new study published in Pediatrics shows that warning labels—which don’t take away anyone’s rights and are relatively easy to administer—may be the answer.

The study featured an online survey of 2381 parents of children ages 6-11, who were asked to select a beverage for their child from a “vending machine.” The online machine was filled with 6 beverages: 1 had no label, 1 had a label with calories, and 4 had labels with different versions of warnings, all based on California proposals that target nonalcoholic drinks with 75 calories from sweeteners for every 12 fluid ounces.

Researchers from the University of Pennsylvania found that far fewer parents chose sugary beverages if they had a warning label. Only 40% chose a beverage with a warning label, compared with 60% who chose one with no label, or 53% with the calorie label.

Variations of the label warned that sugary beverages could cause “obesity,” “weight gain,” or “preventable diseases,” as well as “type 2 diabetes.” Based on questions that the participants answered, researchers found that the parents believed that the warnings about these health conditions “would help change their beliefs about a beverage’s healthfulness and would encourage them to purchase fewer (sugary beverages) for their children.”

Significantly, while there were some differences by political party, the parents felt strongly that warning labels were preferable to other solutions to curbing use of sugary drinks, such as taxes or limits on portion size.

Researchers acknowledged that the effect seen in the online test might not be as strong in the real word. However, they noted, “if there was a strong social desirability bias, we would expect to also see strong effects from exposure to salient calorie labels, but this did not happen.”

Noting that these parents had been asked to purchase a beverage for a child, the team said future work should look at how warning labels would affect soda purchases for adults and teens.

Besides California, warning labels are being discussed by public health officials in Baltimore, Maryland, and some other cities, although none have passed thus far.  

Funding for the study was provided by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

 
Copyright AJMC 2006-2019 Clinical Care Targeted Communications Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
x
Welcome the the new and improved AJMC.com, the premier managed market network. Tell us about yourself so that we can serve you better.
Sign Up