Many Americans are concerned about pharma’s influence throughout the healthcare industry and the implications such influence may have on drug costs. Here are 5 things to know about trends in public concern about pharma's reach.
Many Americans are concerned about pharma’s growing influence throughout the healthcare industry and the implications this may have over drug prices.
Here are 5 things to know about trends in public concern about pharma's reach:
1. New database tracks pharma’s donations to patient advocacy groups
Recently, Kaiser Health News (KHN) released a database that logged 12,000 donations from large, publicly traded drug manufacturers to patient advocacy groups in 2015. The data show that pharmaceutical companies gave at least $116 million to advocacy groups in 2015 alone.
The database, called “Pre$cription for Power,” included the 20 pharmaceutical companies listed in the Standard and Poor 500, of which 14 were transparent to some degree about giving money to patient groups. The same 14 companies reported only about $63 million in lobbying activities for the same period. Though the data only explored a piece of the pharmaceutical industry’s giving overall, it will be expanded with more companies and groups over time, says KHN.
2. Under new tax law, pharma received breaks but raised drug prices
A new report from Democratic Senator Cory Booker’s staff investigated how pharmaceutical companies spent their savings from tax reform. Though shareholders are seeing an increase in buybacks and dividends, the report notes that patients won’t see an immediate relief on their expenses.
Five US drug companies implemented share buybacks totaling $45 billion before or shortly after US lawmakers passed tax reform. In a group of those drug makers and 5 other United States-based companies, none reduced prices in response to the law; however, some did announce increases in research and development, employee pay, or charitable contributions.
The senator’s team that compiled the report said it will be “important to monitor” the pharmaceutical companies as they “continue to make decisions regarding how to allocate their savings.”
3. Industry group spent millions to help control drug pricing message
According to tax disclosures from 2016, the pharmaceutical industry’s biggest trade group, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), raised revenue by almost one-fourth and spent the millions it collected among hundreds of lobbyists, politicians, and patient groups.
This increased spending in 2016 coincided with a flurry of bad publicity about high drug prices after several previously inexpensive drugs became extremely costly. In response, PhRMA spent $7 million in 2016 to prepare its “Go Boldly” campaign, which shows patients and researchers united in the fight against diseases including heart disease, cancer, and Alzheimer disease.
Some of the largest donations PhRMA gave were received by organizations representing patient groups whose members require high-cost drugs. In fact, PhRMA spent more than $2 million on groups such as the Autoimmune Related Disease Association, the American Lung Association, the Lupus Foundation of America, and the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation.
4. AAM addressed relationships with patient groups in its new code of ethics
The Association for Accessible Medicines (AAM) released a new code of ethics for its member companies that specifies companies should not only respect the autonomy of patient organizations but ensure that support for the organizations in the form of grants or charitable contributions is not conditional on the promotion of a specific medicine.
The code incorporates goals and criteria ensuring its members continue to maintain ethical relationships with healthcare professionals and provide objective and accurate information about their medicines.
5. A survey of patient groups revealed some improvements in pharma’s reputation
The organization PatientView recently released the 7th edition of its Corporate Reputation of Pharma report that explored the views of 1330 patient groups worldwide on the reputation of the pharmaceutical industry. Overall, 43% of patient groups that responded to the survey believed that the pharmaceutical industry had an “excellent” or “good” corporate reputation in 2017, compared with 38% in the year prior.
However, patients’ view of pharma was more negative in several other key aspects. For example, 57% of patient groups saw pharma as “excellent” or “good” at producing high-quality producs, a figure that was down from 64% in 2016. Notably, the most recent data show the lowest-reported percentage of groups who believed in pharma’s ability to manufacture high-quality products since 2011.
Dr Chakra Chaulagain: PFS Is the "Bare Minimum," but OS Is Ideal for Choosing Between MM Therapies
March 28th 2024Response rates are important when choosing between therapies to treat multiple myeloma (MM), but improvement overall survival (OS) is the ideal, said Chakra Chaulagain MD, FACP, hematologist/oncologist, Maroone Cancer Center of Cleveland Clinic Florida.
Read More
Exploring Medicare Advantage Prior Authorization Variations
March 26th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the authors of a study published in the March 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® about their findings on variations in prior authorization use across Medicare Advantage plans.
Listen
Alopecia Areata Impacts Patient Perception, Quality of Life
March 27th 2024Patients with alopecia areata (AA) often perceive their hair loss as more severe than dermatologists do, leading to increased emotional and social problems. This study highlights the importance of understanding patient perception for better treatment and improved quality of life.
Read More
Navigating Health Literacy, Social Determinants, and Discrimination in National Health Plans
February 13th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the authors of a study published in the February 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® about their findings on how health plans can screen for health literacy, social determinants of health, and perceived health care discrimination.
Listen
The Supreme Court seems likely to reject a challenge to the abortion pill mifepristone; the FDA is inspecting far fewer pharmaceutical companies conducting clinical research; AstraZeneca has sued to block an Arkansas law that it said would unlawfully expand the 340B program to include for profit-pharmacy chains.
Read More
Poor Well-Being Scores Linked to Early Treatment Stoppage in Multiple Myeloma
March 27th 2024Investigators used the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General General Physical Wellbeing Scale to collect data on patient-reported treatment-related adverse effects, to provide clinicians guidance on predicting risk of early treatment discontinuation among ECOG-ACRIN E1A11 trial participants.
Read More