Supplements and Featured Publications
A Data-Driven Approach to Improving Clinical and Economic Outcomes in Multiple Sclerosis [CME/CNE/CP
Volume 19
Issue 16 Suppl

Multiple Sclerosis Update

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic but incurable disease of the central nervous system (CNS) that is often diagnosed in the second or third decade of life. It is more common among women than men, significantly impairs patient quality of life, and is associated with substantial costs to patients, healthcare systems, and society. Of the approximately 2.3 million individuals worldwide that have MS, more than 400,000 reside in the United States. Although the etiology of MS is not completely understood, a great deal of evidence suggests a complex relationship between environmental and genetic factors. The pathophysiology of MS involves an aberrant attack by the host immune system on oligodendrocytes, which synthesize and maintain myelin sheaths in the CNS. There are 4 identified disease courses in MS, and approximately 85% of people with MS present with relapsing-remitting MS, which is characterized by discrete acute attacks followed by periods of remission. Signs and symptoms of MS are dependent on the demyelinated area(s) of the CNS and often involve sensory disturbances, limb weakness, fatigue, and increased body temperature. The criteria for a diagnosis of MS include evidence of damage in at least 2 separate areas of the CNS, evidence that the damage occurred at different time points, and the ruling out of other possible diagnoses. Diseasemodifying drugs (DMDs) that reduce the frequency of relapses, development of brain lesions, and progression of disability are the standard of care for relapsing forms of MS, and the use of DMDs should be initiated as early as possible.

(Am J Manag Care. 2013;19(16):S294-S300)Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a disease of the central nervous system (CNS) in which inflammation and breakdown occur in the protective insulation that surrounds nerve fibers (myelin), thereby disrupting signals from within the brain, as well as between the brain and the host body. It results in a variety of neurological symptoms that depend upon which pathways are disrupted.1,2 While the onset of MS for most individuals typically occurs between their 20s and 50s, with 2 to 3 times as many women as men being diagnosed with MS, approximately 2% and 5% of patients encounter disease onset before the ages of 10 and 16 years, respectively.2,3 Although life expectancy with MS is at least 25 years from disease onset, with most patients dying from unrelated causes,3 those with MS have worse health-related quality-of-life scores than the general population with regard to physical functioning, vitality, and general health.4-6 Additionally, several studies have evaluated the economic burden associated with MS in the United States, with results indicating that MS is very costly to individuals, healthcare systems, and society.7-10


Approximately 2.3 million individuals worldwide have MS, which includes more than 400,000 in the United States.2 In addition, an estimated 200 persons are diagnosed with MS each week in the United States, which translates to roughly 1 diagnosis of MS every hour.2 The largest and most recent examination of the worldwide prevalence of this often unpredictable and debilitating disease was conducted in a large international study from 2005 to 2007, and included over 100 countries that spanned all World Health Organization (WHO) regions and continents.11

Data from the WHO study indicated that the global median estimated prevalence of MS was 33 cases per 100,000 persons. While MS is present in all regions of the world, its prevalence varies greatly; the highest rates per 100,000 persons were found in North America (140) and Europe (108), and the lowest rates were found in sub-Saharan Africa (2.1) and East Asia (2.2).11 Furthermore, the prevalence of MS may also vary substantially within each region; for instance, in Europe, the highest prevalence per 100,000 persons is found in Sweden (189), whereas the lowest is found in Albania (22).11 Reasons for the observed variation in worldwide prevalence and incidence of MS are not well understood, and although environmental and genetic explanations have been offered, it is widely accepted that both factors likely play important roles.

Etiology and Pathophysiology

The etiology of MS is not completely understood, but epidemiological and association studies do suggest a relationship between multiple environmental and genetic factors.3,12 Several environmental risk factors for MS that have been identified include high Epstein-Barr virus immunoglobulin G antibody titers, low levels of vitamin D and/or ultraviolet radiation exposure, and cigarette smoking.12-14 In addition to these environmental factors, genetic components are thought to be involved in the etiology of MS. The disease is known to aggregate in families,15 and has higher concordance rates in monozygotic twins (up to 30.8%) compared with dizygotic twins (2.4%-4.7%), ordinary siblings (3%),16,17 or half-siblings (1.32%).18 Although children of 2 parents with MS have a 5.8% chance of developing MS,19 no increased risk was observed among adoptive relatives.20

Multiple sclerosis is characterized by acute focal inflammatory demyelination and axonal loss with limited remyelination, which results in chronic multifocal sclerotic plaques. The atrophy and accelerated loss of brain gray matter has also been correlated with disability progression in MS.3,21 Regarding the pathophysiology of MS, oligodendrocytes, which synthesize and maintain the myelin sheath of up to 40 neighboring nerve axons in the CNS, is the principal target of immune attacks in MS.3 The breakdown of immune regulation in autoimmune diseases such as MS is thought to be attributable to molecular mimicry, in which a peptide presented to the peptide-binding groove of a specific class II molecule is immunologically indistinguishable from a self-antigen. Therefore, in MS, an appropriate immunological response to infection can inadvertently generate inappropriate inflammation against a component of the oligodendrocyte-myelin unit, which results in temporally and spatially segregated inflammatory lesions. This breakdown of host immune regulation can lead to the proliferation and activation of autoreactive T cells and their subsequent entry into circulation. These cells can express adhesion molecules and induce reciprocal changes in endothelia, allowing the T cells to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) into the CNS. Once within the host CNS, the activated T cells initiate a proinflammatory loop by re-encountering the antigen and activating the microglia, causing the expression of class II molecules and re-presenting of antigen to T cells. Toxic inflammatory mediators are then released, sustaining a breakdown of the BBB and leading to injury of axons and glia. Although cytokines and growth-promoting factors, which are released by reactive astrocytes and microglia as part of the acute inflammatory process, can promote endogenous remyelination, astrocyte reactivity and gliosis can lead to a physical barrier that prevents further remyelination.3

Clinical Course and Diagnosis

Four disease courses have been identified in MS: (1) relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS); (2) primary-progressive MS (PPMS); (3) secondary-progressive MS (SPMS); and (4) progressive-relapsing MS (PRMS).22 Although the course of the disease in an individual is largely unpredictable, approximately 85% of people with MS begin with a relapsing-remitting course and experience discrete, acute attacks, which are followed by periods of remission.2,22 These exacerbations may occur at random intervals with a limited annual frequency that steadily decreases over time, and in some cases, patients may recover fully; however, in some patients a residual deficit will remain and continue to worsen with each exacerbation.3,22 Although most patients with MS will begin with relapsing-remitting disease, more than 50% of untreated patients will develop SPMS within 10 years, and 90% within 25 years. During this time, those patients will lose the ability to fully recover following exacerbations, which results in a disease and symptomatology that progressively worsens.2,22 Patients with SPMS may also experience relapses, minor remissions, and plateaus.22 PRMS, which is detected in approximately 5% of individuals with MS at diagnosis, is defined as disease that progresses from the onset of MS, with patients experiencing acute exacerbations and continuing disease progression during the periods between relapses.2,22 PPMS, which is diagnosed in approximately 10% of patients with MS, is defined as disease that demonstrates a gradual and nearly continuous progression from onset, without relapses and remissions.2,22 Although some patients may experience an almost steady progression from the beginning, other patients may encounter an occasional plateau during which no progression is noted, and some may even experience minor but temporary improvements.22

MS is associated with a wide array of signs and symptoms that are largely attributable to the affected and damaged area(s) of the CNS. Based on the location(s) of the lesion(s), such as the cerebrum, optic nerve, cerebellum, brain stem, or spinal cord, RRMS can be accompanied by limb weakness, clumsiness, gait ataxia, symptoms of neurogenic bladder and/or bowel, sensory disturbances, unilateral optic neuritis, diplopia (internuclear ophthalmoplegia), and trunk and limb paresthesias that are evoked by neck flexion (and referred to as Lhermitte’s sign).3,23 Another common feature of RRMS is fatigue that worsens in the afternoon, coupled with increased body temperature.3,23 The characteristic appearance of signs and symptoms following exercise or a hot bath, which is referred to as Uhthoff’s phenomenon, is partially due to the demyelinated axons that cannot sustain a reduction of membrane capacitance that is induced by a rise in temperature, which results in conduction failure.3,23 Due to the overlap of signals from neighboring demyelinated axons, some patients may experience a brief (1-2 minutes) but recurrent stereotypical phenomenon that is often triggered by touch or movement, referred to as paroxysmal symptoms, which includes trigeminal neuralgia, ataxia, dysarthria, and a painful tetanic posturing of the limbs.3,23 Although more prominent cortical signs (eg, visual field loss, early dementia, aphasia, recurrent seizures, apraxia, chorea, and rigidity) are rarely primary manifestations of CNS dysfunction, other manifestations of CNS dysfunction (eg, cognitive impairment, depression, emotional lability, dysarthria, dysphagia, vertigo, progressive quadriparesis and sensory loss, ataxic tremors, pain, sexual dysfunction, and spasticity) may develop and become increasingly troublesome.3,23 The signs and symptoms of PPMS are characterized by a slowly evolving upper motor neuron syndrome of the legs, referred to as chronic progressive myelopathy, which worsens gradually and may result in the development of quadriparesis, cognitive decline, visual loss, and brain-stem syndromes, as well as cerebellar, bowel, bladder, and sexual dysfunction.23

Unfortunately, there are no stand-alone symptoms, physical findings, or laboratory tests that can be utilized independently to conclusively determine whether or not an individual has MS.2 Therefore, the diagnosis of MS is based upon established clinical24,25 and, when necessary, laboratory criteria.24 Diagnosis of MS entails a careful review of medical history, a neurologic exam, and various other assessments, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), evoked potential (EP) testing, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis.2 In general, the criteria for a confirmed diagnosis of MS must include evidence of damage in at least 2 separate areas of the CNS (disseminated in space [DIS]), evidence that the damage occurred at different time points (disseminated in time), and the ruling out of all other possible diagnoses.2,24

An essential component of MRI analysis in MS is the presence of gadolinium-enhancing lesions. Gadolinium is a chemical contrast agent used during MRI scans to highlight areas of inflammation, which may indicate active lesions and/or sites of presumed inflammatory demyelination. It is important to note that some tissues may appear to be brighter or darker than other tissues on an MRI scan. This contrast depends on the density of protons in that area such that areas with an increased density appear darker on the scan. Furthermore, relaxation times for protons may vary, and therefore 2 times are commonly measured, T1 and T2. In T1-weighted MRI images, white matter (ie, fat, water, and other fluids) is darker than gray matter, whereas in T2-weighted images, white matter is brighter than gray matter.25

EP analysis may also be useful in identifying DIS by providing physiologic evidence of subclinical dysfunction of the optic nerves and spinal cord through changes in visual evoked responses and somatosensory EPs.26 Further, CSF analysis may assist in the diagnostic process, as those with MS typically have increased intrathecal synthesis of immunoglobulins of restricted specificity, as well as occasional, moderate lymphocytic pleocytosis (fewer than 50 mononuclear cells). The use of the aforementioned diagnostic techniques is particularly important in evaluating patients who present with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), which is defined as the first neurologic episode that persists for a minimum of 24 hours and is caused by inflammation/demyelination in 1 (monofocal) or more (multifocal) sites in the CNS.24,27 Patients with MS who experience a CIS that is characterized by cerebellar or brainstem dysfunction, or incomplete transverse myelitis, as their first event have an increased risk of both recurrent events and disability within a decade if changes are seen in clinically asymptomatic regions of the brain on MRI.28 It is interesting to note that modern diagnostic techniques for MS are also being used to assess the possibility of MS in persons with MRI findings that are suggestive of the disease but do not have the typical symptoms associated with MS, a condition referred to as radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS).29 In the first study of patients with RIS, published in 2009, 18 of 27 patients (66.6%) had CSF measures that were indicative of MS, and 24 of 41 (58.5%) demonstrated radiological progression in the form of new T2 lesions, gadolinium enhancement, or enlarging T2 lesions over a median time period of 2.7 years.29


Traditionally, therapies for MS have been divided into 2 categories: (1) treatments for exacerbations and relapses, such as glucocorticoids and plasmapheresis (not recommended by current treatment guidelines), which is also referred to as apheresis, plasma exchange, or “plex”; and (2) immunomodulatory disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) that reduce the frequency of relapses, the development of brain lesions, and the progression of disability.30 In patients with MS, treating only the exacerbations has been associated with a variety of negative outcomes. In studies that examined the natural course of the disease, clinical progression of RRMS resulted in SPMS within 10 years in more than 50% of all cases, and in 90% within 25 years,2,31 with 29% of patients worsening by 1 to 1.5 points (from an initial score of 0) on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) within 2 years.24,32-36 (The EDSS score is a common end point in MS clinical trials, and a 1-point increase has been used to define disability progression.37,38) Although these data suggest that treatment beyond exacerbations and relapses is essential for improved patient outcomes, further research examining the pathophysiology of MS led to several other observations that underscore the need for early treatment. For example, inflammatory activity, which is the precursor of irreversible neurodegeneration, occurs early in the clinical sequelae of MS.39,40 Therefore, it is critical to initiate therapies that inhibit the inflammatory process early. As such, the disease management consensus statement from the National Multiple Sclerosis Society recommends that DMDs be made available early in the disease process to the appropriate candidates.41

A timeline that depicts the history of DMD availability, as well as DMDs in development, is shown in the Figure, with selected information about DMDs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) listed in the Table.42-52 Currently, 11 agents have been approved by the FDA for use in MS.42-52 Since 2009, a wave of newer agents gained FDA approval, nearly doubling the therapeutic armamentarium.43,49-52 In addition to the current repertoire of DMDs, the drug pipeline for MS, which has seen increased activity in recent years, contains several novel agents for MS that are currently under investigation, including 1 oral agent (laquinimod) and 2 intravenous agents (alemtuzumab and ocrelizumab).53-55


MS is a progressive and incurable disease that substantially decreases patient quality of life and is associated with a clinical and economic burden that weighs heavily on the affected individual, healthcare and managed care systems, and society as a whole. CIS is the first recognizable clinical event that a patient may experience, and it should be treated as the first event of MS. Similarly, RIS is associated with a high risk of progressing to CIS/MS and should therefore be monitored closely. The use of MRI has greatly benefited the therapeutic space for MS, allowing clinicians to make a diagnosis sooner, and providing the opportunity to consider appropriate treatment earlier in the course of the debilitating disease. Additionally, our improved and increasing understanding of the host immune system and its role in the pathogenesis of MS is paving the way for novel, targeted immunotherapies. With new therapies for MS on the horizon, clinicians will have more treatment options for their patients, but are simultaneously faced with additional therapeutic complexity. It is likely that novel mechanisms of action and new agents for MS will raise concerns about the unknown, rare, or long-term safety and efficacy issues, and undoubtedly, additional longterm studies, data collection and analysis, and post marketing surveillance are necessary. However, it is clear that the therapeutic landscape for MS is evolving and will continue to progress, with notable implications for further personalized medicine and improved outcomes.Author affiliation: Multiple Sclerosis Center and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

Funding source: This activity is supported by educational grants from Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals; Biogen Idec; EMD Serono, Inc; Genzyme Corporation; and Questcor Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Author disclosure: Dr Markowitz reports serving as a consultant/paid advisory board member for Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals; Biogen Idec; Acorda; EMD Serono, Inc; Genentech; Genzyme Corporation; Novartis; and Teva.

Authorship information: Concept and design; drafting of the manuscript; and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.

Address correspondence to: E-mail:

  1. Confavreux C, Vukusic S. Natural history of multiple sclerosis: a unifying concept. Brain. 2006;129(pt 3):606-616.
  2. National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Fact sheet: multiple sclerosis. Accessed August 6, 2013.
  3. Compston A, Coles A. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2002;359(9313): 1221-1231.
  4. Pittock SJ, Mayr WT, McClelland RL, et al. Quality of life is favorable for most patients with multiple sclerosis: a populationbased cohort study. Arch Neurol. 2004;61(5):679-686.
  5. Kobelt G, Berg J, Atherly D, Hadjimichael O. Costs and quality of life in multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional study in the United States. Neurology. 2006;66(11):1696-1702.
  6. Coleman CI, Sidovar MF, Roberts MS, Kohn C. Impact of mobility impairment on indirect costs and health-related quality of life in multiple sclerosis. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54756.
  7. O’Brien JA, Ward AJ, Patrick AR, Caro J. Cost of managing an episode of relapse in multiple sclerosis in the United States. BMC Health Serv Res. 2003;3(1):17.
  8. Prescott JD, Factor S, Pill M, Levi GW. Descriptive analysis of the direct medical costs of multiple sclerosis in 2004 using administrative claims in a large nationwide database. J Manag Care Pharm. 2007;13(1):44-52.
  9. Adelman G, Rane SG, Villa KF. The cost burden of multiple sclerosis in the United States: a systematic review of the literature. J Med Econ. 2013;16(5):639-647.
  10. Owens GM, Olvey EL, Skrepnek GH, Pill MW. Perspectives for managed care organizations on the burden of multiple sclerosis and the cost-benefits of disease-modifying therapies. J Manag Care Pharm. 2013;19(1, suppl A):S41-S53.
  11. Multiple Sclerosis International Federation. Atlas of MS 2013. Accessed October 18, 2013.
  12. Cook SD. Does Epstein-Barr virus cause multiple sclerosis? Rev Neurol Dis. 2004;1(3):115-123.
  13. Holick MF. Sunlight and vitamin D for bone health and prevention of autoimmune diseases, cancers, and cardiovascular disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80(6 suppl):1678S-1688S.
  14. Hernán MA, Jick SS, Logroscino G, et al. Cigarette smoking and the progression of multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2005;128(pt 6):1461-1465.
  15. Robertson NP, Fraser M, Deans J, et al. Age-adjusted recurrence risks for relatives of patients with multiple sclerosis. Brain. 1996;119(pt 2):449-455.
  16. Sadovnick AD, Armstrong H, Rice GP, et al. A populationbased study of multiple sclerosis in twins: update. Ann Neurol. 1993;33(3):281-285.
  17. Hansen T, Skytthe A, Stenager E, et al. Concordance for multiple sclerosis in Danish twins: an update of a nationwide study. Mult Scler. 2005;11(5):504-510.
  18. Sadovnick AD, Ebers GC, Dyment DA, Risch NJ. Evidence for genetic basis of multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 1996;347(9017):1728- 1730.
  19. Robertson NP, O’Riordan JI, Chataway J, et al. Offspring recurrence rates and clinical characteristics of conjugal multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 1997;349(9065):1587-1590.
  20. Ebers GC, Sadovnick AD, Risch NJ; Canadian Collaborative Study Group. A genetic basis for familial aggregation in multiple sclerosis. Nature. 1995;377(6545):150-151.
  21. Rudick RA, Lee JC, Nakamura K, et al. Gray matter atrophy correlates with MS disability progression measured with MSFC but not EDSS. J Neurol Sci. 2009;282(1-2):102-111.
  22. Lublin FD, Reingold SC; National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA) Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an international survey. Neurology. 1996;46(4): 907-911.
  23. Noseworthy JH, Lucchinetti C, Rodriguez M, Weinshenker BG. Multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(13):938-952.
  24. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol. 2011;69(2):292-302.
  25. Montalban X, Tintoré M, Swanton J, et al. MRI criteria for MS in patients with clinically isolated syndromes. Neurology. 2010;74(5):427-434.
  26. Gronseth GS, Ashman EJ. Practice parameter: the usefulness of evoked potentials in identifying clinically silent lesions in patients with suspected multiple sclerosis (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2000;54(9):1720- 1725.
  27. National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Clinically isolated syndrome (CIS). Accessed August 6, 2013.
  28. O’Riordan JI, Thompson AJ, Kingsley DP, et al. The prognostic value of brain MRI in clinically isolated syndromes of the CNS: a 10-year follow-up. Brain. 1998;121(pt 3):495-503.
  29. Okuda DT, Mowry EM, Beheshtian A, et al. Incidental MRI anomalies suggestive of multiple sclerosis: the radiologically isolated syndrome. Neurology. 2009;72(9):800-805.
  30. Goodin DS, Frohman EM, Garmany GP Jr, et al. Disease modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the MS Council for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Neurology. 2002;58(2):169-178.
  31. Weinshenker BG, Bass B, Rice GP, et al. The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study: I: clinical course and disability. Brain. 1989;112(pt 1):133-146.
  32. Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology. 1983; 33(11):1444-1452.
  33. Bornstein MB, Miller A, Slagle S, et al. A placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, two-center, pilot trial of Cop 1 in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 1991;41(4):533-539.
  34. Johnson KP, Brooks BR, Cohen JA, et al. Copolymer 1 reduces relapse rate and improves disability in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: results of a phase III multicenter, double-blind placebo-controlled trial: the Copolymer 1 Multiple Sclerosis Study Group. Neurology. 1995;45(7):1268-1276.
  35. The IFNB Multiple Sclerosis Study Group. Interferon beta-1b is effective in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: I: clinical results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled trial. Neurology. 1993;43(4):655-661.
  36. The IFNB Multiple Sclerosis Study Group and the University of British Columbia MS/MRI Analysis Group. Interferon beta-1b in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: final outcome of the randomized controlled trial. Neurology. 1995;45(7):1277-1285.
  37. Polman CH, O’Connor PW, Havrdova E, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(9):899-910.
  38. Phillips JT, Giovannoni G, Lublin FD, et al. Sustained improvement in Expanded Disability Status Scale as a new efficacy measure of neurological change in multiple sclerosis: treatment effects with natalizumab in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2011;17(8):970-979.
  39. Filippi M, Bozzali M, Rovaris M, et al. Evidence for widespread axonal damage at the earliest clinical stage of multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2003;126(pt 2):433-437.
  40. Rocca MA, Mezzapesa DM, Falini A, et al. Evidence for axonal pathology and adaptive cortical reorganization in patients at presentation with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage. 2003;18(4):847-855.
  41. National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Disease management consensus statement. Published 2008. Accessed August 6, 2013.
  42. Betaseron [prescribing information]. Montville, NJ: Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc; 2013.
  43. Extavia [prescribing information]. East Hanover, NJ: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; 2012.
  44. Avonex [prescribing information]. Cambridge, MA: Biogen Idec Inc; 2013.
  45. Rebif [prescribing information]. Rockland, MA: EMD Serono, Inc; 2012.
  46. Copaxone [prescribing information]. Kansas City, MO: Teva Neuroscience, Inc; 2012.
  47. Novantrone [prescribing information]. Rockland, MA: EMD Serono, Inc; 2012.
  48. Tysabri [prescribing information]. Cambridge, MA: Biogen. Idec, Inc; San Diego, CA: Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc; 2013.
  49. Ampyra [prescribing information]. Ardsley, NY: Acorda Therapeutics Inc; 2013.
  50. Gilenya [prescribing information]. East Hanover, NJ: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; 2012.
  51. Aubagio [prescribing information]. Cambridge, MA: Genzyme Corporation; 2012.
  52. Tecfidera [prescribing information]. Cambridge, MA: Biogen Idec Inc; 2013.
  53. Safety and efficacy of orally administered laquinimod versus placebo for treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) (ALLEGRO). website.
  54. Study of alemtuzumab in treatment refractory MS subjects/ alemtuzumab naïve & alemtuzumab experienced subjects. website.
  55. A study of ocrelizumab in comparison with interferon beta-1a (Rebif) in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. website.
CH LogoCenter for Biosimilars Logo