• Center on Health Equity and Access
  • Clinical
  • Health Care Cost
  • Health Care Delivery
  • Insurance
  • Policy
  • Technology
  • Value-Based Care

Unmet Need in the Treatment of Postherpetic Neuralgia

Supplements and Featured PublicationsUnmet Need in the Treatment of Postherpetic Neuralgia
Volume 19
Issue 1 Suppl

The efficacy of first-line therapeutic agents for postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) has been established in randomized, controlled clinical trials. However, pain in PHN is often refractory to treatment. Many of the patients with PHN are elderly, with additional issues of polypharmacy and comorbidity. They experience various types of pain, suggesting that more than 1 pathophysiologic pain mechanism is involved. PHN adversely affects health-related quality of life. Up to this point, no single best treatment has been identified for PHN. Pharmacological treatments for PHN are inadequate, and many patients are undertreated. Suboptimal treatment can be related to intolerable side effects of medications, long titration periods to reach the effective dosage, inadequate dosing, poor compliance with dosing schedules, and low treatment satisfaction. Inadequate therapeutic response leads more than half the patients with PHN treated with either gabapentin or pregabalin to switch to another class of medication, and more than 30% of patients to add on another class of medication. Safety and tolerability are important considerations in therapy, especially in the elderly. Few patients with PHN and physicians are satisfied with the currently available treatments. Thus, the effective management of postherpetic neuralgia remains an ongoing challenge. New and improved treatment options are therefore needed for the effective management of PHN.

(Am J Manag Care. 2013;19:S207-S213)Postherpetic Neuralgia

Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a chronic pain syndrome that can develop following an episode of herpes zoster. Also known as shingles, herpes zoster results from reactivation of varicella zoster virus (VZV) contracted years earlier (usually as chicken pox). Herpes zoster affects approximately 1 million people in the United States each year and the lifetime risk of developing the disease is about 30%.1 Prior to the appearance of a rash, there is often pain, itching, or tingling in the area where the rash will develop. This prodromal period may last anywhere from 1 to 5 days before the rash appears. The hallmark of herpes zoster is a painful, blistering rash that is localized to 1 or 2 dermatomes on 1 side of the body; a dermatome is an area of skin served by a single spinal nerve. The blisters usually scab over in 7 to 10 days and the lesions clear within 2 to 4 weeks.

PHN is a condition in which neuropathic pain persists beyond the clearing of the rash.2 As many as 20% of patients with herpes zoster develop PHN and the risk increases with age.3 The duration of pain required for a diagnosis of PHN varies from 1 to 6 months after onset of the rash4; for some patients, pain can persist longer (years). The rate of spontaneous remission decreases markedly after 6 months.5

The risk of PHN after herpes zoster increases with age, and the elderly are the most frequently and seriously affected.1,6,7 A retrospective population-based study reported that the percentage of patients with herpes zoster who developed PHN (defined as at least 90 days of documented pain) increased from 5% in patients younger than 60 years to 10% in patients aged 60 to 69 years, to 17% in those aged 70 to 79 years, and to 20% in those 80 years or older.8 Aside from age and the age-related decline in cell-mediated immunity, additional risk factors for PHN include female gender, greater rash severity, greater acute pain, the presence of a prodrome, and being immunocompromised.3,9,10 A multivariate logistic regression analysis identified advanced age and deep pain at the initial visit to the pain clinic as significant predictors for PHN.11 Elderly people represent the fastest growing segment of the population in western countries.12 In the 2010 US Census, 40.3 million people, or 13% of the total population, were 65 years or older, more than 13 million were 75 years or older, and more than 5 million were 85 years or older.13 Thus, the incidence of PHN is expected to increase as the population ages.

The severity of pain in PHN ranges from mild to excruciating.14 Patients with PHN have described their pain as a constant, deep aching or burning, as a paroxysmal, lancinating pain, and one that may be provoked by stimuli that are normally not painful (allodynia).15 The pain can persist for months and sometimes years after resolution of the initial herpes zoster rash.16,17 Health-related quality of life is adversely affected in patients with PHN and the pain may negatively affect patients’ lives across 4 health domains: physical, psychological, functional, and social.18

The pathophysiology of PHN is incompletely understood. After reactivation of the VZV, the virus replicates and spreads along a spinal or cranial nerve toward the skin, potentially causing nerve damage. In addition, reactivation of the VZV in herpes zoster may spread viral particles into the dorsal horn of the spinal cord through peripheral sensory nerves. Thus, pain may involve both the peripheral and central nervous systems. This reactivation is also accompanied by hemorrhage, immune response, and destruction of peripheral and central neurons and their fibers.19 As damaged peripheral nerves develop lowered activation threshold for pain, sensory receptors become further sensitized, producing hyperexcitability and spontaneous discharge.3,19,20 In response to increased peripheral nerve activity, dorsal horn neurons in the spinal cord may become altered, impairing descending inhibition of pain, and leading to central sensitization.19,20 With the loss of peripheral sensory fibers, central processes of surviving axons may develop aberrant connections, and the resulting anatomical and functional reorganization may lead to the allodynia and spontaneous pain frequently observed in PHN.19,21-24

Strategies to Prevent PHN

Strategies directed at the prevention of PHN include antiviral drugs and vaccination. Antiviral drugs (eg, acyclovir, famciclovir, and valacyclovir), when administered within 72 hours of rash onset in herpes zoster, can limit viral replication, reduce rash duration, and reduce the risk and/or duration of PHN.25 However, antiviral drugs do not completely prevent PHN.9,26 The vaccination strategy seeks to boost VZV-specific immunity of VZV-seropositive adults, and prevent the latent infection in sensory ganglia from reactivating. Results of the Shingles Prevention Study showed statistically significant reductions in the burden of illness due to herpes zoster (61%), incidence of herpes zoster (51%), and incidence of PHN (67%).5 The vaccine is indicated for the prevention of herpes zoster in individuals 50 years or older.27 However, the vaccine alone will likely not lead to eradication of PHN. As of 2008, only 6.7% of adults 60 years or older reported having received the herpes zoster vaccination.28 In 2009, an estimated 10% of adults 60 years or older reported having received the vaccination.29 Furthermore, Gilden et al reported that even if every healthy adult 60 years or older were vaccinated, there would still be approximately 500,000 cases of herpes zoster annually, with 200,000 experiencing PHN.17

Limitations of PHN Treatment Options

The type and duration of pain in PHN can be highly variable, suggesting that multiple pathophysiological mechanisms may be involved. Pain mechanisms may also differ from one patient to another. These factors, in addition to the incomplete understanding of the causes of pain associated with PHN, make PHN more difficult to treat.

Numerous medications have been evaluated in clinical trials and are associated with a reduction in PHN-related pain (Table).30-37 Gabapentin, pregabalin, topical lidocaine, topical capsaicin, and gabapentin enacarbil have received FDA approval specifically for the PHN indication. However, the American Academy of Neurology, the Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group of the International Association for the Study of Pain, and the European Federation of Neurological Societies Task Force Guidelines also recommend tricyclic antidepressants (amitriptyline, nortriptyline, or desipramine) and opioids as first-line treatments for PHN.30-32 Pain in PHN is often refractory to treatment,2,7,19 and many patients require more than 1 agent to achieve significant pain relief.6,38-42 In addition, approximately 40% to 50% of patients with PHN do not respond to any treatment,43 and other patients experience limited efficacy.

Limited efficacy may be due to the inherent properties of the therapies, but treatment of PHN is often accompanied by intolerable side effects,18,44 which may prevent attainment of therapeutic dosages of oral PHN therapies. This in turn causes inadequate treatment of pain such that patients need to switch medications or add onto existing medications (Figure 1). Neither one of these options guarantees efficacy (dashed lines in Figure 1), and there may still be side effects and/or poor tolerability. The adding on of medications further complicates polypharmacy, a common condition in the elderly.

The tricyclic antidepressants have adverse effects in addition to potential drug-drug interactions,45 and consequently have been identified by the American Geriatrics Society as a class of drugs to avoid in elderly patients.46 Anticonvulsant medications for PHN have been associated with high incidences of dizziness and somnolence.47,48 Opioids have numerous adverse effects including constipation, nausea, dizziness/vertigo, somnolence, vomiting, pruritus, and CNS stimulation; the elderly are more sensitive to opioid CNS side effects. The long-term administration of opioids is also controversial because of concerns over development of tolerance (ie, higher dosages are required for similar pain relief) and the potential for abuse and dependency. Furthermore, drugs commonly used in the elderly, such as antiarrhythmics, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, hormonal therapies, selective serotonin/ norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, statins, and warfarin, can contribute to clinically relevant drug-drug interactions when administered with most opioids.49 Drug-drug interactions may include pharmacokinetic interactions, which affect the way the body absorbs, distributes, metabolizes, or eliminates the drug, or pharmacodynamic interactions which occur when another drug alters the clinical effect of the first drug.

Topical therapies, such as the lidocaine patch or the capsaicin patch, can reduce pain in PHN without significant systemic effects, a characteristic that may be beneficial in the elderly population. Their localized action may also be of use for PHN affecting the face or extremities. However, these treatment options tend to be more short acting. Moreover, for patients whose pain is more widespread, topical treatments are limited by the inherent localized nature of their application. Many patients report only partial relief with the lidocaine patch, and some patients discontinue therapy due to local skin irritation.50 Patients may require 2 weeks of therapy to determine if the patch provides meaningful benefit.50

Special care is required for the application of the capsaicin patch, which needs to be administered by a physician or under the close supervision of a physician, with specific instructions to use nitrile gloves (and not latex gloves) when the affected area is treated with a topical anesthetic to reduce application site pain. Once the patch is removed, the skin site is cleansed with a cleansing gel, and all cleansing materials are disposed of in accordance with local biomedical waste procedures.36

Inadequate Therapy

Patients often report intolerable treatmentrelated side effects. Some of the effects of pain medications can be addressed by titrating the drug dosages.18 A 10-day titration to a daily dosage of 200 mg (50 mg 4 times daily) with immediate-release tramadol was initiated at 50 mg/day and gradually increased by 50 mg increments every 3 to 4 days.34 A slower rate of initiating tramadol therapy improved tolerability, with fewer patients discontinuing due to dizziness or vertigo.51 Similarly, to avoid the adverse effects of confusion, somnolence, and fatigue, the dosage of gabapentin is titrated up slowly. However, drug titration may require several weeks to reach the effective dosage. Starting at 100 to 300 mg/day and increasing by 100 to 300 mg/day until the target dosage is reached means that a full therapeutic effect is not reached for 8 weeks or longer,52 leaving patients with PHN suffering for a significant period of time before their pain is adequately treated.

In a retrospective administrative claims database analysis (n = 1645 patients with PHN), a low percentage of patients treated with gabapentin (14%) reached the target dosage (1800 mg/day: 600 mg 3 times daily), and it took patients 10 weeks to reach 1800 mg/day dosage of gabapentin, and 9.2 weeks to reach a dosage of pregabalin of 300 mg/day or greater (a dosage with similar efficacy to 1800 mg/day gabapentin).53

Another reason for suboptimal treatment in patients with PHN involves patterns of medication use. Many patients report taking dosages of their prescribed medications that were less than the amount recommended in the prescribing information. Patients 65 years and older who responded to a newspaper survey reported a mean daily amitriptyline dosage of 37 mg (effective dosage 50 mg/day or higher) and a mean gabapentin dosage of 620 mg (package labeling recommends between 900 mg/day and 1800 mg/day).44 In the retrospective claims database analysis of gabapentin and pregabalin use, the mean daily dosages were 826 mg for gabapentin and 187 mg for pregabalin53; both were below the recommended daily dosages of 1800 mg/day for gabapentin and 300 mg per day for pregabalin. Suboptimal dosing may produce inadequate handling the capsaicin patch.36 Prior to patch application, treatment response, causing the patient to switch therapy, add on medications, or discontinue therapy. From the retrospective claims database study with gabapentin and pregabalin in PHN, more than half the patients switched during treatment to another class of medications, and one-third added a class of medications (Figure 2).53 Opioids were added by over 50% of the patients on gabapentin and pregabalin (Figure 3A).53 Among the patients who switched their therapy, approximately one-third switched to opioids (Figure 3B).53

Compliance with the dosage and dosing regimen also contribute to suboptimal treatment. The dosing frequencies for the oral therapeutic agents listed in Table 1 range from once daily to 6 times daily. Pharmacokinetic parameters dictate the dosing regimen of drugs. For example, the recommended maintenance dosage of immediate-release gabapentin for PHN is 1800 mg/ day, administered in 3 divided doses.31 This dosing regimen is consistent with gabapentin’s elimination half-life of 5 to 7 hours following oral administration.54,55 However, more frequent dosing is often associated with poor compliance. A systematic review of studies demonstrated an association between dosage regimens and medication compliance. Mean dose-taking compliance declined as the number of daily doses increased: 1 dose, 79%; 2 doses, 69%; 3 doses, 65%; and 4 doses, 51%.56

Unmet Need

The increased prevalence of PHN in the aging population is associated with increased healthcare utilization and costs as well as patient disability.2,57 Patients with PHN have an average of 5 outpatient visits compared with 2 outpatient visits for herpes zoster patients without PHN, and have a mean of 17.1 prescriptions filled compared with a mean of 5.5 prescriptions for herpes zoster patients without PHN.58 Available treatment options for PHN are limited, and often require several weeks to reach target dosing, during which time patients have inadequate pain control. For many elderly patients with PHN, pain is severe and debilitating, and dissatisfaction with treatment is high.44 A recent national study on practice patterns found that few patients with PHN and physicians were satisfied with the treatments currently available.59 Effective strategies for the treatment of pain associated with PHN remains an unmet public health need.60 With the increasing numbers of elderly persons in the population and the current inadequate outcomes of PHN treatment, new treatment options for PHN are needed.1. CDC. Shingles clinical overview. http://www.cdc.gov/shingles/hcp/clinical-overview.html. Updated January 10, 2011. Accessed July 3, 2012.

2. Dworkin RH, Portenoy RK. Pain and its persistence in herpes zoster. Pain. 1996;67:241-251.

3. Johnson RW, Wasner G, Saddier P, Baron R. Postherpetic neu- ralgia: epidemiology, pathophysiology and management. Expert Rev Neurotherapeutics. 2007;7:1581-1595.

4. Cunningham AL, Dworkin RH. The management of post-herp- etic neuralgia. BMJ. 2000;321:778-779.

5. Oxman MN, Levin MJ, Johnson GR, et al. A vaccine to prevent herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia in older adults. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2271-2284.

6. Cappuzzo KA. Treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: focus on pregabalin. Clin Interven Aging. 2009;4:17-23.

7. Johnson RW, McElhaney J. Postherpetic neuralgia in the elder- ly. Int J Clin Pract. 2009;63:1386-1391.

8. Yawn BP, Saddier P, Wollan PC, St. Sauver JL, Kurland MJ, Sy LS. A population-based study on the incidence and complication rates of herpes zoster before zoster vaccine introduction. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82:1341-1349.

9. Jung BF, Johnson RW, Griffin DRJ, Dworkin RH. Risk factors for postherpetic neuralgia in patients with herpes zoster. Neurology. 2004;62:1545-1551.

10. Gialloreti LE, Merito M, Pezzotti P, et al. Epidemiology and economic burden of herpes zoster and post-herpetic neuralgia in Italy: a retrospective, population-based study. BMC Infec Dis. 2010;10:230-240.

11. Kanbayashi Y, Onishi K, Fukazawa K, et al. Predictive fac- tors for postherpetic neuralgia using ordered logistic regres- sion analysis. Clin J Pain. 2012;28(8)712-714. doi:10.1097/AJP. Ob013e318243ee01.

12. Christensen K, Doblhammer G, Rau R, Vaupel JW. Ageing populations: the challenges ahead. Lancet. 2009;374:1196-1208.

13. Werner CA; United States Census Bureau. The older population: 2010. http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-09.pdf. Published November 2011.

14. Weaver BA. Herpes zoster overview: natural history and inci- dence. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2009;109(suppl 2):52-56.

15. Truini A, Galeotti F, Haanpaa M, et al. Pathophysiology of pain in postherpetic neuralgia: a clinical and neurophysiological study. Pain. 2008;140:405-410.

16. Harpaz R, Ortega-Sanchez IR, Seward JF. Prevention of herpes zoster: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR. 2008;57:1-30.

17. Gilden D, Nagel MA, Mahalingam R, et al. Clinical and molec- ular aspects of varicella zoster virus infection. Future Neurol. 2009;4:103-117.

18. Johnson RW, Bouhassira D, Kassianos G, Leplege A, Schmader KE, Weinke T. The impact of herpes zoster and post- herpetic neuralgia on quality-of-life. BMC Med. 2010;8:37-49.

19. Argoff CE, Katz N, Backonja M. Treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: a review of therapeutic options. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004;28:396-411.

20. Opstelten W, van Wijck AJM, Stolker RJ. Interventions to prevent postherpetic neuralgia: cutaneous and percutaneous techniques. Pain. 2004;107:202-206.

21. Fields HL, Rowbotham M, Baron R. Postherpetic neuralgia: irritable nociceptors and deafferentation. Neurobiology Dis. 1998;5:209-227.

22. Woolf CJ, Costigan M. Transcriptional and posttranslational plasticity and the generation of inflammatory pain. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1999;96:7723-7730.

23. Woolf CJ, Max MB. Mechanism-based pain diagnosis. Anesthesiology. 2001;95:241-249.

24. Gharibo C, Kim C. Neuropathic pain of postherpetic neuralgia. Pain Med News. 2011;9:84-92.

25. Sampathkumar P, Drage LA, Martin DP. Herpes zoster (shin- gles) and postherpetic neuralgia. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84:274-280.

26. Kost RG, Straus SE. Postherpetic neuralgia — pathogenesis, treatment, and prevention. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:32-42.

27. Zostavax (zoster vaccine live) prescribing information. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck & Co; June 2011. http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/z/zostavax/zostavax_pi2.pdf. Accessed July 9, 2012.

28. Lu PJ, Euler GL, Harpaz R. Herpes zoster vaccination among adults aged 60 years and older in the US 2008. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40:e1-e6.

29. National Health Interview Survey Table 2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. www.cdc.gov/vaccines/statssurv/nhis/downloads/2009-nhis-tables.xls. Accessed July 9, 2012.

30. Zagaria MAE. Postherpetic neuralgia: seniors at risk. US Pharm. 2011;36:24-26.

31. Boivin G, Jovey R, Elliott CT, Patrick DM. Management and prevention of herpes zoster: a Canadian perspective. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2010;21:45-52.

32. Neurontin (gabapentin) prescribing information. New York, NY: Pfizer; September 2011. http://www.pfizer.com/products/rx/rx_product_neurontin.jsp. Accessed June 18, 2012.

33. Lyrica (pregabalin) prescribing information. New York, NY: Pfizer; June 2012. http://labeling.pfizer.com/ShowLabeling.aspx?id=561. Accessed July 9, 2012.

34. Horizant (gabapentin enacarbil) prescribing information. Research Triangle Park, NC: GlaxoSmithKline; June 2012. http://us.gsk.com/products/assets/us_horizant.pdf. Accessed July 9, 2012.

35. Ultram (tramadol) prescribing information. Titusville, NJ: Janssen; September 2009. http://www.janssenpharmaceuticalsinc.com/assets/ultram.pdf. Accessed July 9, 2012.

36. Lidoderm (lidocaine patch 5%) prescribing information. Chadds Ford, PA: Endo Pharmaceuticals; March 2010. http:/www.lidoderm.com/pdf/lidoderm_pack_insert.pdf. Accessed July 9, 2012.

37. Qutenza (capsaicin) prescribing information. San Mateo, CA. http://www.qutenza.com/_docs/qutenza_full_PI_.pdf. Accessed July 9, 2012.

38. Dubinsky RM, Kabbani H, El-Chami Z, Boutwell C, Ali H. Practice parameter: treatment of postherpetic neuralgia. Neurology. 2004;63:959-965.

39. Attal N, Cruccu G, Baron R, et al. EFNS guidelines on the pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain: 2010 revision. Eur J Neurology. 2010;17:1113-1123.

40. Dworkin RH, O’Connor AB, Audette J, et al. Recommendations for the pharmacological management of neu- ropathic pain: an overview and literature update. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85(suppl):S3-S14.

41. American Academy of Neurology. AAN Evidence-based guide- line summary for clinicians: treatment of postherpetic neuralgia. www.aan.com/professionals/practice/pdfs/pn_guideline_physicians.pdf. Accessed June 13, 2012.

42. Hempenstall K, Nurmikko TJ, Johnson RW, A’Hern RP, Rice ASC. Analgesic therapy in postherpetic neuralgia: a quantitative systematic review. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e164.

43. Rowbotham M, Petersen KL. Zoster-associated pain and neu- ral dysfunction. Pain 2001;93:1-5.

44. Oster G, Harding G, Dukes E, Edelsberg J, Cleary PD. Pain, medication use, and health-related quality of life in older persons with postherpetic neuralgia: results from a population-based sur- vey. J Pain. 2005;6:356-363.

45. Douglas MW, Johnson RW, Cunningham AL. Tolerability of treatments for postherpetic neuralgia. Drug Safety. 2004;27:1217-


46. The American Geriatrics Society 2012 Beers Criteria Update Expert Panel. American geriatrics society updated Beers Criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60:616-631.

47. Rice ASC, Maton S; Postherpetic Neuralgia Study Group. Gabapentin in postherpetic neuralgia: a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study. Pain. 2001;94:215-224.

48. Sabatowski R, Galvez R, Cherry DA, et al. Pregabalin reduces pain and improves sleep and mood disturbances in patients with post-herpetic neuralgia: results of a randomized, placebo-con- trolled clinical trial. Pain. 2004;109:26-35.

49. Smith H, Bruckenthal P. Implications of opioid analgesia for medically complicated patients. Drugs Aging. 2010;27:417-433.

50. Christo PJ, Hobelmlann G, Maine DN. Post-herpetic neuralgia in older adults: evidence-based approaches to clinical manage- ment. Drugs Aging. 2007;24:1-19.

51. Ruoff GE. Slowing the initial titration rate of tramadol improves tolerability. Pharmacother. 1999;19:88-93.

52. Stillman M. Clinical approach to patients with neuropathic pain. Cleveland J Med. 2006;73:726-739.

53. Johnson P, Becker L, Halpern R, Sweeney M. Real-world treat- ment of postherpetic neuralgia with gabapentin or pregabalin. J Clin Investig. In press.

54. McLean MJ. Clinical pharmacokinetics of gabapentin. Neurol. 1994;44:S17-S22.

55. Boyd RA, Turck D, Abel RB, Sedman AJ, Bockbrader HN. Effects of age and gender on single dose pharmacokinetics of gabapentin. Epilepsia. 1999;40:474-479.

56. Claxton AJ, Cramer J, Pierce C.A systematic review of the association between dose regimens and medication compliance. Clin Ther. 2001;23:1296-1310.

57. Dworkin RH, Panarites CJ, Armstrong EP, Malone DC, Pham SV. Healthcare utilization in people with postherpetic neuralgia and painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59:827-836.

58. White RR, Lenhart G, Singhal PK, et al. Incremental 1-year medical resource utilization and costs for patients with herpes zoster from a set of US health plans. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27:781-792.

59. Glauser TA, Salinas GD, Nevins H, Williamson JC, Wallace MS, Abdolrasulnia M. Communication gaps between physicians and patients with postherpetic neuralgia: results from a national study on practice patterns. J Pain Res. 2011;4:407-415.

60. Dworkin RH, Gnann JW, Oaklander AL, Raja SN, Schmader KE, Whitley RJ. Diagnosis and assessment of pain associated with herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia. J Pain. 2008;1(suppl 1):S37-S44.

© 2024 MJH Life Sciences
All rights reserved.