News
Article
Author(s):
There are significant environmental impacts of dermatological practices that call for interdisciplinary collaboration and policy changes to promote sustainability and reduce carbon emissions within the field.
There are significant environmental impacts of dermatological practices that call for interdisciplinary collaboration and policy changes to promote sustainability and reduce carbon emissions within the field. | Image Credit: chapicha - stock.adobe.com
Environmental impacts of dermatology should be addressed, and interdisciplinary collaboration should be fostered to create and implement policy changes that promote sustainable actions in dermatological practices and their affiliated organizations to reduce carbon emissions, according to a study published in the International Journal of Dermatology.1
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, mainly carbon dioxide (CO2), are a major contributor to climate change, the alteration of global climate patterns, like temperature, air pressure, and humidity in certain geographic locations.
Experts at the 2025 American Academy of Dermatology Annual Meeting emphasized the relationship climate change and pollution have on dermatology, elevating the need for climate advocacy and sustainable practices.2 Forever chemicals like per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances upregulate inflammatory cytokines, induce lipid peroxidation, cause oxidative DNA damage, and disrupt the skin barrier and vitamin D endocrine system. Other forms of pollution include the potential effects of microplastics, with dermatologists recommending reducing single-use plastic products.
The combustion of fossil fuels, animal husbandry, and industry emissions are the main drivers of the surge in warming climates.1 The skin's capacity to sweat or produce vascular regulation significantly influences heat-related illnesses. Notably, experts estimate that climate change affects migrant communities and displaced people at disproportionate levels.
“We aim to provide a narrative review of the contribution of the medical system to climate change with a focus on dermatology and the response to these challenges from dermatological societies and their dedicated working groups,” study authors stated.
Health care industries contribute an estimated 4% to 6% of the global CO₂ emissions that impact climate change. The supply chain, travel, facilities, medical services, and medications all contribute significantly to these outcomes. Dermatology often prescribes topical formulations, like leave-on or rinse-off products, that may enter waste streams and impact ecosystems and the environment. Oftentimes, topical agents contain environmentally harmful ingredients. Skin care products also typically contain ingredients with poor biodegradability that come in small plastic containers that may have an outsized environmental impact.
Sustainable health care primarily aims to provide and promote health care for the population without compromising the environmental, economic, and social resources of society and future generations. Reducing air pollution and GHG emissions from health care, prioritizing public health measures to prevent disease, and improving resource use efficiency are significant aspects to include throughout sustainable procurement.
Climate adaptation encompasses minor and major adjustments to improve the effects of climate change and avoid harm to people and natural systems. Dermatology-related climate adaptation could involve targeted risk communication to ensure patients who suffer from chronic conditions prepare bags, including their medication and supplies.
Climate mitigation includes the adjustments made with climate adaptation and the goal of reducing GHG emissions as the primary driver of climate change. Appropriately using surgical instruments and medical supplies in dermatology is a medical example that promotes climate mitigation.
There are general principles of sustainable medicine that are transferable to dermatology. Climate-sensitive and resource-sensitive health care relies on demand-side and supply-side policies. The 6 working groups identified in the review linked to dermatology-related climate change and sustainability are:
Dermatologists should further evaluate their contributions to carbon emissions, remain informed about the impact of climate change on the skin, educate patients, and advocate for policy changes to protect public health.3 The implementation of environmentally sustainable practices could reduce waste and carbon emissions while offering cost-saving benefits. These changes must be pushed forward by a collective effort of dermatologists who advocate for climate change, improve sustainability in the workplace, and prioritize research to fill knowledge gaps while supporting policies that protect the environment.
Potential structural barriers include poor funding and lack of prioritization for climate adaptation and mitigation by policy stakeholders.1 Additionally, topical formulations are neglected in the field, requiring further research and strategies for environmental mitigation.
“It is critical to recognize our limitations as HCPs [health care providers], and interdisciplinary collaboration in creating and implementing policy changes will be needed,” study authors concluded.
References
1. Niebel D, Tso S, Parker ER, et al. Environmental impact of dermatology and action towards it: a narrative review. Int J Dermatol. Published online April 25, 2025. doi:10.1111/ijd.17810
2. McCormick B. Climate change, pollution’s growing impact on dermatology. AJMC®. March 10, 2025. Accessed May 6, 2025. https://www.ajmc.com/view/climate-change-pollution-s-growing-impact-on-dermatology
3. Islam RK, Tong VT, Lipner SR. Going green in dermatology. JAAD reviews. Published online November 1, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jdrv.2024.11.007