Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia is a common adverse effect in children with cancer, yet there are less serious causes of febrile neutropenia for which extended in-hospital treatment might be unnecessary.
Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia is a common adverse effect in children with cancer, yet there are less serious causes of febrile neutropenia for which extended in-hospital treatment might be unnecessary, according to a study published in Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews.
Although children with neutropenia may be more subject to infections and related complications, there may be some instances where the standard hospitalization and antibiotic treatments may not be necessary. The authors collected various publications from multiple organizations in order to see how different discharge times affected children with cancer and neutropenia, looking at both randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials.
Discharge times were categorized as very early with an average of less than 24 hours, early with an average of less than 5 days, and non-early with an average of 5 days or more.
The team included 2 randomized controlled trials: Santolaya 2004 and Brack 2012. Santolaya 2004 compared early discharge to non-early discharge and found no clear evidence of difference in treatment failure or duration of treatment; costs were lower in the early discharge group. Brack 2012 compared very early discharge to early discharge and found no clear evidence of difference in treatment failure or median duration of any antimicrobial treatment; costs were not assessed. It is possible, however, that this absence of clear evidence indicates a lack of power in the studies.
“Evidently, there are still profound gaps regarding very early and early discharge in children with cancer and febrile neutropenia,” the authors wrote.
They concluded that there was limited data regarding safety of early discharge compared to non-early discharge for children with low risk of invasive infection. They hope that future studies will utilize a larger sample size and “aim for uniform and objective criteria regarding the identification of a low-risk febrile neutropenic episode.”
Standard Criteria for Loss of Ambulation Needed in DMD
April 19th 2024A recent study suggests the differences between ambulation definitions for patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) can impact the identification of ambulant vs nonambulant individuals, and standard criteria across settings are needed.
Read More
Government agencies have created an online portal for the public to report potential anticompetitive practices in health care; there are changes coming to the “boxed warning” section for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies (CAR T) to highlight T-cell blood cancer risk; questions about the safety of obesity medications during pregnancy have arisen in women on them who previously struggled with fertility issues.
Read More
Oncology Onward: A Conversation With Penn Medicine's Dr Justin Bekelman
December 19th 2023Justin Bekelman, MD, director of the Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, sat with our hosts Emeline Aviki, MD, MBA, and Stephen Schleicher, MD, MBA, for our final episode of 2023 to discuss the importance of collaboration between academic medicine and community oncology and testing innovative cancer care delivery in these settings.
Listen
Gene, Light Therapy Combo Shows Promise Against Prostate Cancer Cells in Proof-of-Concept Study
April 18th 2024In their preclinical model, the researchers found efficacy both in vitro and in vivo by using CRISPR-Cas9 to mimic porphyria and combining the technology with light therapy.
Read More
Pegcetacoplan for PNH More Cost-Effective Than Anti-C5 Monoclonal Antibodies
April 18th 2024A cost-utility analysis conducted from the perspective of the Italian health system found that pegcetacoplan was more effective and less costly than 2 complement 5 (C5) inhibitors for the treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH).
Read More