New health technologies will not automatically address disparities-it all depends on how those tools are used, explained Julia Adler-Milstein, PhD, assistant professor at the School of Information and the School of Public Health at the University of Michigan.
New health technologies will not automatically address disparities—it all depends on how those tools are used, explained Julia Adler-Milstein, PhD, assistant professor at the School of Information and the School of Public Health at the University of Michigan. It’s important to see if patients can access and understand their data, while ensuring that these technologies eliminate rather than exacerbate disparities.
Transcript (slightly modified)
What effects do health IT and health technologies have on disparities?
In terms of disparity, there’s a lot of potential for these tools to be deployed in a way that addresses disparities. But by the same token they could be used to sort of perpetuate the current system for which we know there are real disparities. So I think the technology itself is not going to do that much, it’s really going to depend on how it’s used.
So there was discussion in the session [at the AcademyHealth's National Health Policy Conference] about telemedicine and improving access and that’s one clear way in which disparities, at least, and access could be addressed. And I think that, again, getting your data and knowing how to use it well was going to require a certain degree of health literacy and patient engagement and activation and so I think then the question is: "will that worsen disparities?" If you have a group of patients who are active and engaged and able to take this data and use it, and then a group of patients who aren’t—so I think it’s really an open question.
I think it could help it, I think it could hurt, I think it could have no impact and, again, it’s one of the big questions that we’re going to have to do. We’re going to have to see how it all unfolds. But none of this should stop the progress in terms of getting patient access to the data, getting these tools out there. But there’s something, at least from a policy perspective, that we need to keep our radar on for, and if we start to see disparities make sure that we’re going to be able to address the upstream causes of that. Which, again, I don’t think they’ll be technology issues I think they’ll really be about use of technology.
POSITIVE Trial Update on Patients With Breast Cancer Attempting Pregnancy
December 8th 2023At last year’s San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, POSITIVE trial primary outcome data were presented on breast cancer–free interval, with women who paused endocrine therapy to attempt pregnancy having a similarly small rate of recurrence vs external controls from the SOFT and TEXT trials: 8.9% vs 9.2%.
Read More
Prediction Model Identified Risk Factors for ED Visits in Patients With Lung Cancer
December 7th 2023A risk prediction model that was based on machine learning could help to make resource utilization more efficient by correctly predicting emergency department (ED) visits in patients with lung cancer.
Read More
Emily Goldberg Shares Insights as a Genetic Counselor for Breast Cancer Risk Screening
October 30th 2023On this episode of Managed Care Cast, Emily Goldberg, MS, CGC, a genetic counselor at JScreen, breaks down how genetic screening for breast cancer works and why it is so important to increase awareness and education around these screening tools available to patients who may be at risk for cancer.
Listen
Dr Kathryn Lindley Explains the Importance of Cardio-Obstetrics in Fellowship Programs
December 5th 2023Kathryn Lindley, MD, FACC, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, talks about why it’s important to incorporate cardio-obstetrics training into cardiovascular disease fellowship programs.
Read More