Adding daratumumab to standard-of-care regimens consistently improves outcomes among patients with multiple myeloma, noted Mark Wildgust, PhD, vice president of Global Medical Affairs/Oncology at Janssen.
Subcutaneous daratumumab is well tolerated in patients with multiple myeloma, and adding it to standard-of-care regimens consistently improves outcomes among patients. Updated data from the APOLLO trial bear this out, noted Mark Wildgust, PhD, vice president of Global Medical Affairs/Oncology at Janssen.
Transcript
Given the result of the APOLLO study, what new takeaways do we have about daratumumab in multiple myeloma?
I think in the APOLLO study, we know that those patients who have had an IMiD [immunomodulatory drug] like lenalidomide or a PI [proteasome inhibitor], like Velcade, those patients, their outcomes then can be quite poor. And pom-dex [pomalidomide-dexamethasone] is a common standard-of-care regimen that's used.
So daratumumab plus pom-dex was already approved on a single-arm phase 2 study in the United States. And so the phase 3 APOLLO study really helps us further understand the efficacy and safety of daratumumab when we add it to pom-dex. And we saw a significant improvement in progression-free survival. So, we saw hazard ratio of 0.63. So, that represented a 37% reduction in the reduction of progression or death. And overall, we saw a median progression-free survival of 12.4 months and 6.9 months. So, clinically significant improvements in terms of outcomes.
The other thing with APOLLO is that APOLLO is the first of our phase 3 studies in multiple myeloma that have now read out with subcu dara [subcutaneous daratumumab]. So we have the COLUMBA study before that looked at IV [intravenous] and subcu dara to look at that from a noninferiority perspective. But APOLLO is our first multiple myeloma phase 3 study.
And I think, impressively too, when we look at the safety profile, I think [there is] further confirmation of the safety profile of daratumumab; very, very low rate of infusion-related reactions. It was something like 5% of patients had infusion-related reactions in the APOLLO study, and all of those were grade 1/grade 2. So real confirmation that subcu dara is well tolerated.
We also saw in the APOLLO study an improvement in depth of response. We saw the overall response rate of 69% versus 46%. We also saw a higher VGPR [very good partial response] rate or better, and we also saw a higher rate of MRD [minimal residual disease] negativity. So APOLLO really speaks to what I said before. We now know, and I think we're quite clear, whenever we add daratumumab to a standard-of-care regimen, we always improve those outcomes. And APOLLO speaks to that. And I think the subcu data also confirms how subcu dara is safe. And it's well received, as well.
With follow-up ongoing, will you add data from additional patients?
The phase 3 study is complete. But it's immature. And what we mean is, we really only have just under 17 months of follow-up. And so with a median progression-free survival of 12.5 months, we've got to a point where we have enough events, we know it’s statistically significant. What you will now see with longer follow-up is we'll be able to look at secondary endpoints such as progression-free survival, too, and overall survival. And then we'll be also able to look at further updates in terms of the progression-free survival data itself. I think you’ll basically see longer follow-up giving us more confidence with the results. And a good example for that is here at ASH, we’re reporting the 4-year update from MAIA.
When we originally reported out the 4-year data, we reported out the progression-free survival data from MAIA. We saw the hazard ratio of 0.56, and here now with 4 years’ worth of follow-up, we're seeing a hazard ratio of 0.54. So with longer follow-up, we're really getting that confirmation that that benefit that we saw is stable, is consistent. There's no indication that the APOLLO results will change. But I think most importantly, we'll see that increased confidence of the outcome. We’ll also see, hopefully, the survival results, as well.
Overcoming Employment Barriers for Lasting Social Impact: Freedom House 2.0 and Pathways to Work
April 16th 2024To help celebrate and recognize National Minority Health Month, we are bringing you a special month-long podcast series with our Strategic Alliance Partner, UPMC Health Plan. Welcome to our second episode, in which we learn all about Freedom House 2.0 and the Pathways to Work program.
Listen
Gene and Cell Therapies Hold Potential—but How Can Payers Manage Their Costs?
April 18th 2024Presenters at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) 2024 annual meeting discussed the current promise and future potential of gene and cell therapies, as well as payer management strategies for these costly treatments.
Read More
Making Giant Strides in Maternity Health Through Baby Steps
April 9th 2024To help celebrate and recognize National Minority Health Month, we are kicking off a special month-long podcast series with our strategic alliance partner, UPMC Health Plan. Welcome to our first episode, which is all about the Baby Steps Maternity Program and its mission to support women throughout every step of their pregnancy journey.
Listen
Need for Pharmacogenomic Testing in Mental Health Care Explored at AMCP 2024
April 17th 2024Presenters from Mayo Clinic discussed the benefits of implementing pharmacogenomic testing in mental health care for the betterment of patient outcomes, reducing medical costs, and more at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) 2024 annual meeting.
Read More