The bar is set very high in terms of the biosimilar requirement definition, and physicians who are hesitant about substituting biosimilars for treatment should not be worried about the perceived differences, according to Pamela S. Becker, MD, PhD, professor of medicine in the Division of Hematology at the University of Washington School of Medicine.
The bar is set very high in terms of the biosimilar requirement definition, and physicians who are hesitant about substituting biosimilars for treatment should not be worried about the perceived differences—especially because of the rigorous examination they received before FDA approval, according to Pamela S. Becker, MD, PhD, professor of medicine in the Division of Hematology at the University of Washington School of Medicine.
Transcript (slightly modified)
Why do you think some physicians are hesitant about substituting their patients’ treatment with a biosimilar and how can we overcome that barrier?
I believe it may be related to the same hesitation to using a generic drug, that I think they perceive that there could be differences. But in actuality, having just reviewed all of the details of the steps in the process that the first biosimilar went through—in terms of physical-chemical comparison, in terms of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, clinical trial comparison—and seeing just exactly how exacting that proof was, I believe that there shouldn’t be hesitation. The bar is set very high in terms of how similar is required in order to meet that biosimilar requirement definition.
Is there a need for patient education on biosimilars?
I think there’ll be the same hesitation on having a biosimilar in terms of the concern that it’s less effective in some way or that there’ll be other side effects. But the side effect profiles and the efficacy have to be proven before the FDA will consider that approval. So in some ways I feel like the regulation is so strict that I don’t anticipate that there’ll be new problems.
Early Involvement Critical in Treating Immunotherapy-Induced Overlap Syndrome
April 19th 2024A series of case studies reveals the importance of early diagnosis and involvement of special teams of clinicians when dealing with potential cases of overlap syndrome, which encompasses myocarditis, myasthenia gravis, and immune checkpoint inhibitor–related myositis.
Read More
Overcoming Employment Barriers for Lasting Social Impact: Freedom House 2.0 and Pathways to Work
April 16th 2024To help celebrate and recognize National Minority Health Month, we are bringing you a special month-long podcast series with our Strategic Alliance Partner, UPMC Health Plan. Welcome to our second episode, in which we learn all about Freedom House 2.0 and the Pathways to Work program.
Listen
Real-World Study Reveals Key Insights Into DLBCL Treatment Patterns, Outcomes
April 18th 2024A recent study offers valuable insights into the characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in patients across different lines of therapy, providing a look into the landscape of DLBCL management.
Read More
Making Giant Strides in Maternity Health Through Baby Steps
April 9th 2024To help celebrate and recognize National Minority Health Month, we are kicking off a special month-long podcast series with our strategic alliance partner, UPMC Health Plan. Welcome to our first episode, which is all about the Baby Steps Maternity Program and its mission to support women throughout every step of their pregnancy journey.
Listen
Pegcetacoplan for PNH More Cost-Effective Than Anti-C5 Monoclonal Antibodies
April 18th 2024A cost-utility analysis conducted from the perspective of the Italian health system found that pegcetacoplan was more effective and less costly than 2 complement 5 (C5) inhibitors for the treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH).
Read More