The value of multicancer early detection tests is based not only on cost, but cost in relation to the outcomes, said Patricia Deverka, MD, MS, senior researcher, deputy director at the Center for Translational and Policy Research and Precision Medicine, University of California San Francisco.
Patricia Deverka, MD, MS, senior researcher, deputy director at the Center for Translational and Policy Research and Precision Medicine, University of California San Francisco, explains how payers, providers, and patients all play a role in the success and value of multicancer early detection (MCED) tests.
Transcript:
What challenges do you anticipate when determining the value of MCED tests, taking into account the perspectives of payers, providers, and patients?
Clearly for payers, I think that there will be interest in the short-term affordability or budget impact of making these tests available to their covered population. I think that is something and, typically, budget impact looks at the initial 1, maybe 2 years out after a new technology is introduced. So I think affordability and budget impact will be very important for payers, but I also think, particularly Medicare, they will be interested in long-term cost-effectiveness, which I would say is sort of my definition of value—not simply looking at cost in isolation but cost relative to the outcome. So I do think that they will [be interested], and that's going to be driven by the cancer-specific survival benefits of earlier detection of cancers, taking into account that there will be false positives and essentially cost associated with the diagnostic workup of people that ultimately don't have a cancer.
Right now, when looking at these tests, payers right now don't have a clear multicancer framework to show how they will be evaluating the value of these tests. I think that providers are really going to need to know the cancer detection rates by cancer type and by stage, and that will vary. I think they'll be very interested in the diagnostic pathway that's pursued for people who screen positive and how those referrals and handoffs get to a final confirmed or unconfirmed diagnosis of cancer—so the true positives, the false positives. And I think providers would be very interested to see how to integrate these tests with current standard-of-care screening, and what patients continue to get their mammograms and colonoscopies, or lung CT if they're a heavy smoker. All of that will be very important.
I think the patients really need to weigh in on, what are the behavioral and quality-of-life effects of these cancer tests? Does this cause any emotional distress? How does it affect their adherence to standard-of-care screening? Are they willing or able to do cost sharing for all of the out-of-pocket expenses that may accrue with follow-up diagnostic procedures?
Those are all some of the information gaps that we currently have and what information will need to be developed to support the appropriate clinical integration of these tests.
Transcript edited for clarity.
Dr Kathy Zackowski Discusses the Importance of Rehabilitation Research and Trials in MS
April 26th 2024Kathy Zackowski, PhD, National MS Society, expresses the inherent value of quality rehabilitation trials for broadening clinical understandings of multiple sclerosis (MS) and bettering patient outcomes.
Read More
Examining Low-Value Cancer Care Trends Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic
April 25th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the authors of a study published in the April 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® about their findings on the rates of low-value cancer care services throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
Listen
Empowering Community Health Through Wellness and Faith
April 23rd 2024To help celebrate and recognize National Minority Health Month, we are bringing you a special month-long podcast series with our Strategic Alliance Partner, UPMC Health Plan. In the third episode, Camille Clarke-Smith, EdD, MS, CHES, CPT, discusses approaching community health holistically through spiritual and community engagement.
Listen
Dr Michael Farwell on FDG PET/CT Imaging to Predict Immunotherapy Response in Advanced Melanoma
April 15th 2024Michael Farwell, MD, associate professor of radiology at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, provides insights into a study on the benefits of using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT imaging to detect metabolic tumor changes in skin cancer.
Read More