News

Article

Dupilumab Improves Pre-, Postbronchodilator Lung Function Measures in Patients With COPD, Type 2 Inflammation

Two abstracts presented at the American Thoracic Society 2024 International Conference analyzed the phase 3 LIBERTY COPD BOREAS trial, finding that dupilumab improves pre- and post-bronchodilator lung function measures in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and type 2 (T2) inflammation.

Dupilumab improved both pre- and post-bronchodilator (BD) lung function measures in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and type 2 (T2) inflammation, according to 2 abstracts presented at the American Thoracic Society (ATS) 2024 International Conference.1,2

Both abstracts analyzed the phase 3 LIBERTY COPD BOREAS study (NCT03930732), a 52-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that evaluated the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous dupilumab at a dosage of 300 mg every 2 weeks vs placebo on lung function parameters in patients with moderate to severe COPD and T2 inflammation.3 Dupilumab is a monoclonal antibody that works by blocking the shared receptor component for interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13.1 The study population consisted of 939 patients, with 468 randomized to dupilumab and 471 to placebo.

Woman holding pair of paper lungs | Image Credit: LIGHTFIELD STUDIOS - stock.adobe.com

Woman holding pair of paper lungs | Image Credit: LIGHTFIELD STUDIOS - stock.adobe.com

The first abstract analyzed both the pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (pre-BD FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) of patients with COPD and T2 inflammation through mixed-effects models for repeated measures. Among the study population, the mean (SD) baseline pre-BD FEV1 was 1.28 (0.45) L for the dupilumab group and 1.32 (0.46) L for the placebo group. At week 12, the least squares (LS) mean change from the baseline pre-BD FEV1 was 0.16 L (95% CI, 0.126-0.195) for dupilumab and 0.077 L (95% CI, 0.042-0.112) for placebo (mean difference, 0.083 L; 95% CI, 0.116-0.189; P < .001).

At week 52, the researchers found the LS mean change from the baseline pre-BD FEV1 to be 0.153 L (95% CI, 0.116-0.189) for the dupilumab group and 0.07 L (95% CI, 0.033-0.107) for the placebo group (mean difference, 0.083 L; 95% CI, 0.038-0.128; P < .001). Of the study population, 41.1% of patients in the dupilumab group had improved pre-BD FEV1 by 100 mL or more at week 52 compared with 34.3% of the placebo group.

Mean (SD) baseline pre-BD FVC was 2.71 (0.74) L for patients in the dupilumab group and 2.83 (0.90) L for the placebo group. At week 12, the researchers found the LS mean change from baseline pre-BD FVC to be 0.098 L (95% CI, 0.054-0.141) for the dupilumab group and 0.029 L (95% CI, –0.015 to 0.072) for the placebo group (mean difference, 0.069; 95% CI, 0.016-0.121; P = .01).

At week 52, the LS mean change from baseline pre-BD FVC was 0.079 (95% CI, 0.032-0.127) in the dupilumab group and –0.009 L (95% CI, –0.057 to 0.039) in the placebo group (mean difference, 0.088; 95% CI, 0.029-0.148; P = .004). Overall, the researchers determined that dupilumab improved pre-BD lung function measures in patients with COPD and T2 inflammation.

Although the second abstract also analyzed the BOREAS trial, it investigated the post-BD FEV1 and FEV1/FVC ratio among patients with COPD and T2 inflammation.2 First, the researchers determined the mean baseline post-BD FEV1 to be 1.39 (0.47) L in the dupilumab group and 1.41 (0.47) L in the placebo group. At week 12, the LS mean change from the baseline post-BD FEV1 was 0.156 L (95% CI, 0.121-0.192) among the dupilumab group and 0.084 L (95% CI, 0.048-0.120) among the placebo group (mean difference, 0.072; 95% CI, 0.030-0.115; P = .001).

At week 52, the LS mean change from baseline post-BD FEV1 was 0.138 L (95% CI, 0.101-0.174) for those in the dupilumab group vs 0.058 L (95% CI, 0.021-0.096) for those in the placebo group (mean difference, 0.079; 95% CI, 0.034-0.124; P < .001). Additionally, 38.3% of patients in the dupilumab group had their post-BD FEV1 increase by 100 mL or more at week 52 vs 29.5% in the placebo group.

As for the mean baseline post-BD FEV1/FVC ratio, it was 0.49 (0.12) for the dupilumab group and 0.49 (0.11) for the placebo group. The week 12 LS mean change from baseline post-BD FEV1/FVC was 0.037 (95% CI, 0.030-0.044) for those in the dupilumab group and 0.023 (95% CI, 0.015-0.030) for those in the placebo group (mean difference, 0.014; 95% CI, 0.005-0.023; P = .002).

Lastly, at week 52, the dupilumab group’s LS mean change from baseline post-BD FEV1/FVC was 0.333 (95% CI, 0.025-0.041), and the placebo group's LS mean change was 0.023 (95% CI, 0.016-0.031); the mean difference was 0.010 (95% CI, –0.000 to 0.019; P = .055). Overall, the researchers found that dupilumab improved post-BD FEV1 and FEV1/FVC ratio in those with COPD and T2 inflammation.

Based on the findings presented in both abstracts, dupilumab improved both pre- and post-BP lung function measures in patients with COPD and T2 inflammation, namely FEV1, FVC, and FEV1/FVC ratio. Therefore, these abstracts show that dupilumab effectively improves lung function in this patient population.

References

  1. Papi A, Hanania NA, Bhatt SP, et al. Dupilumab improves pre-bronchodilator lung function measures in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with type 2 inflammation: data from the phase 3 Boreas trial. Abstract presented at: ATS 2024. May 17-22, 2024; San Diego, CA.
  2. Hanania NA, Bhatt SP, Rabe KF, et al. Dupilumab improves post-bronchodilator lung function in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with type 2 inflammation: data from the phase 3 Boreas trial. Abstract presented at: ATS 2024. May 17-22, 2024; San Diego, CA.
  3. Bhatt SP, Rabe KF, Hanania NA, et al. Dupilumab for COPD with type 2 Inflammation indicated by eosinophil counts. New England Journal of Medicine. 2023;389(3). doi:10.1056/nejmoa2303951
Related Videos
Screenshot of Susan Wescott, RPh, MBA
4 KOLs are featured in this series
4 KOLs are featured in this series
Screenshot of an interview with Adam Colborn, JD
Justin Oldham, MD, MS, an expert on IPF
Justin Oldham, MD, MS, an expert on IPF
Screenshot of Stephanie Hsia, PharmD
Screenshot of an interview with James Chambers, PhD
Screenshot of an interview with Megan Ehret, PharmD
Interview screenshot with Megan Ehret, PharmD
Related Content
AJMC Managed Markets Network Logo
CH LogoCenter for Biosimilars Logo