Few employers are planning to eliminate their health benefits in 2015, but they are still looking to make noticeable changes, according to a report from the Employee Benefit Research Institute.
Few employers are planning to eliminate their health benefits in 2015, but they are still looking to make noticeable changes, according to a report from the Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI).
The report uses findings from the SHRM/EBRI 2014 Health Benefits Survey, which found just 1% of plan sponsors expect to eliminate health benefits in 2015, but a large number of employers will continue to introduce wellness rewards and penalties.
“We are in the middle of open enrollment season, so we figured people would be interested to know what health plan sponsors are thinking,” Paul Fronstin, director of EBRI’s Health Research and Education Program, and author of the report, said in a statement. “We found that very few employers plan to make major changes—at least for now—and most seem to be moving toward adoption of wellness programs.”
The most common change employers will make to healthcare plans in 2015 is adding wellness rewards or penalties (26.3%), followed by requiring spouses to get coverage through their own employer (7.9%), institute spousal surcharge (6.7%), and create tiered networks (3.6%). Just 1% plans to eliminate coverage entirely and 1.3% plans to eliminate coverage for part-time workers.
Other plan design options garnering less interest right now were private health insurance exchanges (3.2%), value-based insurance design (2.6%), or reference pricing (0.6%).
Changes to healthcare plans are being led by large companies with 750 or more full-time employees. More than a third (34.6%) of large employers will add wellness rewards or penalties, for instance.
According to the EBRI report, the increasing interest in wellness programs may be a result of both the Affordable Care Act’s financial incentives and the 2018 excise tax on high-cost health plans. As of now, 15% of plan sponsored expect at least one of their plans will trigger the excise tax.
“Ultimately, concerns about triggering the excise tax on high-cost health plans may result in accelerated adoption of tiered networks, private health insurance exchanges, value-based insurance design, and reference pricing,” the report concludes.
Examining Low-Value Cancer Care Trends Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic
April 25th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the authors of a study published in the April 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® about their findings on the rates of low-value cancer care services throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
Listen
Dr Dalia Rotstein: Physicians Must Be Aware MS Affects People of All Backgrounds
April 24th 2024Dalia Rotstein, MD, MPH, emphazises the importance of awareness that multiple sclerosis (MS) impacts patients from various backgrounds as clinicians think through ways to improve access to care and research efforts in MS.
Read More
Navigating Health Literacy, Social Determinants, and Discrimination in National Health Plans
February 13th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the authors of a study published in the February 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® about their findings on how health plans can screen for health literacy, social determinants of health, and perceived health care discrimination.
Listen
What We’re Reading: Abortion Privacy Rules; Alzheimer Drug Hurdles; Nursing Home Staffing Overhaul
April 23rd 2024New health privacy rules aim to protect patients and providers in an evolving abortion landscape; some physicians express concerns about efficacy, risks, and entrenched beliefs in treating Alzheimer disease; CMS addresses longstanding staffing deficits in nursing homes.
Read More
Award-Winning Poster Presentations From AMCP 2024
April 23rd 2024At the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) 2024 annual meeting, multiple poster presentations concerned with health equity, data collection, glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists, and more were acknowledged for their originality, relevance, clarity, bias, and quality.
Read More