While the researchers found a "modest risk" of diabetes associated with job insecurity, they said it pointed to the need for policies that promoted job stability and better wages.
Employees who are worried about losing their jobs are at a 19% higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes (T2D), according to an analysis of multiple studies from the United States, Europe, and Australia.
The 19 studies involved more than 140,000 participants with an average follow-up of 9.4 years, according to results reported in the Canadian Medical Association Journal.
While researchers say the study doesn’t prove that job insecurity causes diabetes, it could encourage policy makers to take steps to promote more job stability and better wages, according to lead author Jane Ferrie, PhD, who spoke with Reuters. They called the increased risk from job insecurity “modest.”
In the studies, participants were asked at the outset if they feared losing their jobs, and between 6% and 40% said yes, depending on the study. The risk of diabetes from job insecurity would work alongside other factors, such as obesity and cardiovascular disease, but it could also aggravate these conditions due to high levels of stress.
In the United States, policy leaders have pointed to the “workaholic culture,” where the amount of unused vacation is at an all-time high, with 4 in 10 Americans not using all available vacation days. The United States is also one of the few countries that does not have guaranteed sick days, so many workers will not take time off to go to a doctor or get routine screenings, a problem that has been cited in health literature for years.
Approximately 9% of Americans and about 10% of the population worldwide has the disease, according to data from the CDC and the World Health Organization. The vast majority have T2D.
Reference
Ferrie JE, Virtanen M, Jokela M, et al. Job insecurity and risk of diabetes: a meta-analysis [published online October 3, 2016]. CMAJ, doi: 10.1503/cmaj.150942.
Research Points to Potential MCIDs in Diabetes Distress Scale–17
November 29th 2023Researchers identified a value of at least 0.25 to be a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in diabetes distress, and MCID values of 0.38 and 0.39 for emotional and interpersonal distress subscales and physician and regimen distress subscales, respectively.
Read More
For National Women’s Health Week, One Company Emphasizes Cardiovascular Risk Management
May 10th 2022On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we speak with Joanne Armstrong, MD, MPH, vice president and chief medical officer for Women’s Health and Genomics at CVS Health, on the distinct pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease in women and how her own health experiences have influenced her perspective on cardiovascular disease management.
Listen
In this interview with The American Journal of Managed Care®, Katie Queen, MD, addresses the complexity of obesity as a medical condition, pivoting to virtual care while ensuring that patients who lived in a rural location continued to receive adequate care, and the importance of integrating awareness of obesity and chronic disease prevention into local food culture.
Read More
How Can Employers Leverage the DPP to Improve Diabetes Rates?
February 15th 2022On this episode of Managed Care Cast, Jill Hutt, vice president of member services at the Greater Philadelphia Business Coalition on Health, explains the Coalition’s efforts to reduce diabetes rates through the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP).
Listen
Study Reveals Factors That Further Increase Colorectal Cancer Risk for Adults With T2D
November 14th 2023The strongest associations between diabetes and colorectal cancer risk were observed in participants with a recent diabetes diagnosis and those who had not undergone recent colonoscopy, underscoring the significance of cancer screening.
Read More