Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) saw the benefit of funding from an American Cancer Society (ACS) program aimed at strengthening colorectal cancer screening rates over a 3-year period.
An American Cancer Society (ACS) program was effective at strengthening colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), a study suggested.
The study appears early online in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine. The authors said it has implications for broader public health efforts to increase cancer prevention and screening.
In 2013, ACS initiated the Community Health Advocates Implementing Nationwide Grants for Empowerment and Equity (CHANGE) grant program, which was designed to reduce breast and CRC screening disparities by building community capacity to implement evidence-based interventions proven to increase cancer screening rates. Funding is awarded to FQHC partners, with technical assistance provided by ACS field staff.
Funded FQHCs were required to implement at least 1 provider-oriented strategy (provider assessment and feedback or provider reminder/recall systems) and at least 1 client-oriented strategy (education, client reminders, or navigation). Most grantees (88.4%) implemented 3 to 5 intervention strategies throughout their funding period.
Investigators compared screening rates of FQHCs funded by CHANGE grants to those of matched controls. At the start of the study period, CRC screening rates were low across the board, with funded FQHCs lagging nonfunded FQHCs (26.4% vs 30.4%).
In the first year (2013-2014), funded FQHCs increased their CRC screening rates significantly more than nonfunded FQHCs. Funded FQHCs increased by 8.7% (from 26.4% to 35.1%) while nonfunded FQHCs increased by 2.7% (from 28.5% to 31.2%).
Across the 3 years, increases were 12.7% (from 26.4% to 39.1%) and 9% (from 28.5% to 37.5%), respectively. The difference in change rates between groups across the 3 years was not significant.
"Even in the absence of the ACS grant funds, many FQHCs increased their CRC screening rates substantially during the 3-year period," write the authors. "The 80% by 2018 CRC campaign is a national initiative that serves as a catalyst for concentrated focus on CRC screening and may have contributed to an overall increase in CRC screening rates."
They emphasize that such specific funding, along with data accountability and reporting, can improve policies and practices to eventually increase screening rates among uninsured and underserved populations.