A new review of Medicare prescription drug plans suggests that these plans need incentives that will push them to consider long-term outcomes and costs because they tend to consider only short-term clinical outcomes and costs related only to the pharmacy benefit.
A new review of Medicare prescription drug plans (PDPs) suggests that these plans need incentives that will push them to consider long-term outcomes and costs because they tend to consider only short-term clinical outcomes and costs related only to the pharmacy benefit.
Greater efforts are needed to develop mechanisms to align Medicare PDP incentives with long-term outcomes and costs associated with both medical and pharmacy benefits, Anna Hung, PharmD, and Eleanor M. Perfetto, PhD, of the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy in Baltimore, concluded in the July 2016 issue of the Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy. Presently, there are very few incentives encouraging PDPs to consider these long-term outcomes when making formulary decisions, they wrote.
The authors noted that Medicare PDPs do not cover both medical and pharmacy benefits, unlike Medicare Advantage plans. Additionally, Medicare PDPs do not retain enrollees for long periods of time; approximately 50% of enrollees in PDPs leave their original PDPs 3 years after they enroll—switching plans to save money and seek more choices in other plans. Thus, both the fragmentation of pharmacy and medical benefits and the short time horizon considered when making drug formulary decisions are the 2 main factors influencing short-term costs over long-term outcomes, the authors point out.
Hung and Perfetto used PubMed and Google to search for quality measures, payment models, and public reporting tools by using search terms such as Medicare Part D, quality improvement, quality measures, quality indicators, and formulary. Several databases and collections including the National Quality Forum and the National Quality Measures Clearinghouse were searched. Quality measures were classified into 3 categories of quality problems as set forth by the Institute of Medicine: misuse or avoidable complications preventing patients from receiving full potential benefit of a service; overuse; and underuse. Hung and Perfetto found no quality measures directly related to the formulary decision-making process specifically for Medicare PDPs, but they did use 7 quality measures indirectly related to formulary decision-making processes that were identified and used to measure underuse of medications, adherence, and misuse.
The authors concluded that Medicare Part D star ratings of quality measures and their use by CMS have potential as incentives for PDPs to consider long-term outcomes and costs associated with both medical and pharmacy benefits, although adherence measures for more than 3 chronic conditions are needed. The Medicare Plan Finder website can also be an incentive for PDPs to consider long-term outcomes and costs associated with both medical and pharmacy benefits if they add quality measures and display longer-term information on the website.
Finally, they found that URAC (which accredits health plans, pharmacy benefit management [PBM] and specialty pharmacies) PBM Accreditation standards and measures provide incentives for PBMs that contract with Medicare PDPs to consider medical outcomes and costs, although not necessarily for the long term.
However, the authors concluded that there is a need to develop more incentives for PDPs to consider long-term outcomes when making formulary decisions regarding overage; tier placement and cost sharing; and use of prior authorization, quantity limits, and step therapy.
“Successfully creating such incentives could lead to better health, better care, and lower costs in the long term,” they concluded.
Oncology Onward: A Conversation With Thyme Care CEO and Cofounder Robin Shah
October 2nd 2023Robin Shah, CEO of Thyme Care, which he founded in 2020 with Bobby Green, MD, president and chief medical officer, joins hosts Emeline Aviki, MD, MBA, and Stephen Schleicher, MD, MBA, to discuss his evolution as an entrepreneur in oncology care innovation and his goal of positively changing how patients experience the cancer system.
Listen
HMO and EPO Insurance Plans More Likely to Promote Use of Biosimilars
November 21st 2023Health plan type highly influences the likelihood of biosimilar uptake, with low-flexibility insurance plans more likely to have patients who either switched to a biosimilar or were initiated on a biosimilar.
Read More
Oncology Onward: A Conversation With Dr Debra Patt of Texas Oncology
August 1st 2023Debra Patt, MD, PhD, MBA, joins hosts Emeline Aviki, MD, MBA, and Stephen Schleicher, MD, MBA, for episode 2 of our newest podcast, "Oncology Onward: Conversations With Innovators and Changemakers in Cancer Care."
Listen
Therapists’ Perspectives on Access to Telemental Health Among Medicaid-Enrolled Youth
November 10th 2023This qualitative study elucidates therapists’ perspectives on barriers to and facilitators of access to telemental health among Medicaid-enrolled youth served by a large safety-net organization.
Read More