The 2019 Kaiser Family Foundation Employer Health Benefits Survey results revealed significant rises in annual premiums, setting the context for the role of health insurance reform during the 2020 election cycle.
The 2019 Kaiser Family Foundation Employer Health Benefits Survey results revealed significant increases in annual premiums, setting the context for the role of health insurance reform during the 2020 election cycle.
The survey involved a total of 9972 firms, including private firms and nonfederal government employers with at least 3 employees. The survey included questions for benefit managers about their firm’s largest health maintenance organization, preferred provider organization, point-of-service plan, and high-deductible health plan with a savings option.
“Employer-sponsored health insurance is the largest source of coverage in the United States, covering about 153 million nonelderly people,” noted the authors. “As in past years, the survey asked firms about eligibility for and enrollment in their health benefits programs, as well as about the characteristics of up to four of their largest health plans."
The results revealed that in 2019 the average annual premium for single coverage rose 4% to $7188, while the average annual premium for family coverage rose 5% to $20,576. Additionally, covered workers contributed to 18% of the cost for single coverage and 30% of the cost for family coverage, on average, according to the results.
The survey results also demonstrated that 57% of firms offered health benefits to at least some of their workers, while some larger firms found that take-up dropped due to the elimination of the individual mandate policy.
“Given this relative stability in premium growth and coverage, the vibrant public debate about whether the United States needs a public insurance program to replace or be an alternative to private coverage might come as a surprise,” the authors said. “At the time of this writing, every leading Democratic candidate in the 2020 presidential primary race was supporting some type of public program that would, or could, enroll a substantial share of the nonelderly who currently have employer-based coverage.”
The authors concluded that concerns about affordability are likely to continue, considering that employer plans are unlikely to become more generous. Therefore, if there is a high-profile health reform debate, affordability for those with employer coverage may become a new focus, according to the researchers.
Reference
Claxton G, Rae M, Damico A, et al. Health Benefits In 2019: Premiums Inch Higher, Employers Respond To Federal Policy [published October 2019]. Health Affairs. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01026
Nathan Walcker Discusses Value-Based Oncology Care Initiatives at FCS
September 8th 2023Nathan Walcker, CEO at Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute (FCS), highlights some of the recent partnerships and initiatives at FCS to improve community-based oncology care from a value-based perspective.
Listen
HMO and EPO Insurance Plans More Likely to Promote Use of Biosimilars
November 21st 2023Health plan type highly influences the likelihood of biosimilar uptake, with low-flexibility insurance plans more likely to have patients who either switched to a biosimilar or were initiated on a biosimilar.
Read More
Promoting Health Equity and Resiliency in Trauma-Affected Communities
January 31st 2023On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we speak with Reverend Paul Abernathy, CEO of the Neighborhood Resilience Project and board member of UPMC for You, who discusses his experiences in promoting health and resiliency in trauma-affected communities, as well as challenges related to access and accessibility of care and medical mistrust.
Listen
AMA Continues Call for Medicare Payment System Fix During Interim Meeting
November 20th 2023The American Medical Association (AMA) is continuing to urge Congress to stop the impending 3.4% cut to physicians, and other organizations also weigh in on the pros and cons of the 2024 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule.
Read More