A study in Diabetes Care examined the effects of high-deductible health plans on healthcare utilization for diabetes patients with varying incomes.
A study in Diabetes Care examined the effects of high-deductible health plans (HDHPs) on healthcare utilization for diabetes patients with varying incomes. The researchers found that lower-income patients reported decreased service use and a higher likelihood of delaying necessary treatment when enrolled in an HDHP.
Privately insured enrollees with diabetes were surveyed and classified based on their income (lower or higher) and annual deductible amount (no deductible, low deductible, or high deductible). The participants in HDHPs were also asked about their medical debt and their likelihood of obtaining medical care.
Among lower-income respondents, enrollees in a HDHP reported significantly fewer checkups and specialist visits than those with no deductible. More than half (53%) of the lower-income HDHP enrollees with medical debt reported they had delayed or avoided needed care, compared with just 28.3% of the higher-income respondents.
After adjustment for covariates, the lower-income diabetics with any deductible had significantly fewer checkups, primary care visits, and specialists than those with no deductible. Respondents in both income categories who were in a HDHP reported lower visits in these 3 categories, compared with those without a deductible.
Despite the lowered utilization rates, there were no significant differences in diabetes control measures or reported health status between respondents of different income levels or deductible amounts. The authors suggested that the study’s time frame may have been too short to capture these changes, and indicated that a follow-up study should conduct a longer analysis.
The authors noted that previous research has demonstrated that many low-income families enroll in HDHPs due to their less costly premiums, but lower- and middle-income patients with chronic illnesses are most likely to reduce care when enrolled in HDHPs. Low-income diabetics are already more likely to experience diabetes complications, regardless of insurance type. When these factors are combined, they wrote, “HDHPs for low-income patients with diabetes is problematic mandated insurance.”
Furthermore, medical debt is more common among lower-income patients with diabetes, and the study showed that respondents with medical debt were 2.5 times more likely than those without debt to avoid or delay getting necessary care. Considering the importance of regular preventive checkups and primary care visits in managing chronic diseases like diabetes, these patterns of reduced service use are troubling.
With this knowledge, the researchers wrote that clinicians have a duty to make the most of their visits with lower-income patients and to consider prescribing more affordable medications. More long-term solutions would come through value-based insurance reform or income-based cost-sharing that reduces the burden on lower-income patients with chronic illnesses.
Research Points to Potential MCIDs in Diabetes Distress Scale–17
November 29th 2023Researchers identified a value of at least 0.25 to be a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in diabetes distress, and MCID values of 0.38 and 0.39 for emotional and interpersonal distress subscales and physician and regimen distress subscales, respectively.
Read More
How Can Employers Leverage the DPP to Improve Diabetes Rates?
February 15th 2022On this episode of Managed Care Cast, Jill Hutt, vice president of member services at the Greater Philadelphia Business Coalition on Health, explains the Coalition’s efforts to reduce diabetes rates through the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP).
Listen
Balancing Care Access and Fragmentation for Better Outcomes in Veterans With Diabetes
April 22nd 2021The authors of a study in the April 2021 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® discuss the possible reasons behind the link between care fragmentation and hospitalizations in veterans with diabetes, as well as potential opportunities to address disjointed care in the context of the widespread telehealth uptake seen during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Listen