Chargemaster lists may encourage patients to shop around for services, but the authors of this report said the implications of this change for dermatology are not well-defined.
A recent study examined the utility of hospital chargemasters as decision-making tools for uninsured or self-pay individuals needing dermatology care.
In a move to increase price transparency for consumers, CMS in 2019 required hospitals to publish or make available their gross pricing for procedures, but many hospitals published their chargemaster lists instead, which may be difficult to interpret.
Chargemaster lists may encourage patients to shop around for services, but the authors of this report said the implications of this change for dermatology ares not well-defined.
In this study, they analyzed pricing differences for 2 families of codes, skin biopsy procedures and destruction procedures for benign/premalignant lesions.
Similarly to other studies, the authors found that chargemaster lists were difficult to use and that there was wide variation in pricing. In addition, they found no correlation between prices and US regions or hospital sizes.
The authors reviewed chargemasters from the 5 largest hospitals in each state (n = 250) and reviewed procedure prices, presence of Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, presence of abbreviations for terminology (biopsy/tangential/destruction), public accessibility, readability (defined as written in English), and formatting of chargemasters.
Results showed:
The maximum gross prices for dermatological procedures ranged up to 470-fold higher magnitude than the minimum. Additionally the median prices were up to 48-times higher than respective national Medicare fees.
Some examples of price ranges included:
Price variability may be due to hospital location and amenities, different accounting methods for converting hospital charges to prices, or reporting of the full cycle of care versus a discrete procedure, the authors wrote.
It could also be “a result of some hospitals reporting the price of a family of CPT codes versus those which do not use CPT codes in their chargemaster reporting different values. Inflated, inaccurate, or inconsistent pricing may discourage or delay patients from receiving necessary care and undermine the goal of transparency,” they wrote.
One limitation of their study, the authors noted, is that most dermatology procedures are not conducted in hospitals.
While there may be some usefulness in these lists for patients paying out-of-pocket, “chargemasters in their current form require further standardization and enhancement of readability and access to improve their usefulness for
prospective patients,” they concluded.
Reference
Yang K, Drake L, Ghatnekar S, et al. Evaluating chargemaster price transparency for dermatologic procedures: a national analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. Published online May 2, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2022.04.049.
California Aims for Equity by Redefining Cancer Care
December 8th 2023Authors highlight key aspects of the California Cancer Care Equity Act, including its focus on Medi-Cal beneficiaries, the requirement for managed care plans to contract with specialized cancer centers, and the definition of complex cancers.
Read More
Oncology Onward: A Conversation With Thyme Care CEO and Cofounder Robin Shah
October 2nd 2023Robin Shah, CEO of Thyme Care, which he founded in 2020 with Bobby Green, MD, president and chief medical officer, joins hosts Emeline Aviki, MD, MBA, and Stephen Schleicher, MD, MBA, to discuss his evolution as an entrepreneur in oncology care innovation and his goal of positively changing how patients experience the cancer system.
Listen
Dr Kathryn Lindley on Pregnancy-Related Cardiovascular Care Gaps and Training Initiatives
December 8th 2023Cardiologists need skills in risk assessment, contraception counseling, and hypertension management for pregnant patients, according to Kathryn Lindley, MD, FACC, Vanderbilt University Medical Center.
Read More
Insufficient Data, Disparities Plague Lung Cancer Risk Factor Documentation
September 24th 2023On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we speak with the senior author of a study published in the September 2023 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® on the importance of adequate and effective lung cancer risk factor documentation to determine a patient's eligibility for screening.
Listen
What We’re Reading: RSV Vaccine Demand; Permanent Contraception; Drug Negotiation Impact
December 8th 2023The Biden administration recently met with manufacturers of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) immunizations to encourage them to increase access to the vaccine; since the Dobbs v Jackson decision, many patients have been seeking more permanent reproductive health care solutions; a Mathematica analysis showed that Medicare prescription drug price negotiations could have cut seniors’ out-of-pocket costs by nearly a quarter had the program been in effect in 2021.
Read More
Patients With RA in Remission Withdrawing From TNF Inhibition Show Flare Increases
December 8th 2023New data presented at ACR 2023 highlighted the differences in rates of flares and Boolean 2.0 remission rates compared to patients with rheumatoid arthritis who continued a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi).
Read More