A review of our peer-reviewed research in the healthcare and mainstream press.
An article in HealthIT Analytics by Jacqueline Belliveau discussed the findings of a study recently published in The American Journal of Managed Care® (AJMC®) about the impact of a value-based program on high-need patients. The study, “Sustained Participation in a Pay-for-Value Program: Impact on High-Need Patients,” evaluated whether pay-for-value programs adopted by primary care practices (PCP) translated into better care for high-need patients. The study found that while PCPs participating in the program could reduce 30- and 90-day readmissions, reduce emergency department visits, and improve the overall quality of care for the patients, medical and surgical costs were not lowered.
Â
Participation in an accountable care organization (ACO) has significant bearing on the adoption of health information technology (IT) compared with non-ACO hospitals. This was the bottom line of another AJMC® study, which included an analysis of data from US nonfederal, acute care hospitals. Measures considered in the analysis included those of Meaningful Use (MU), Stage 1 and Stage 2 core and menu criteria,  patient engagement—oriented health IT, and health information exchange participation. Referencing this study in her article in Hospital EMR & EHR, Anne Zieger expressed hope that ACO incentives will push participating hospitals to make more strategic investments in health IT than ever before.
Â
But does health IT impact patient satisfaction scores? According to a paper in The American Journal of Accountable Care® (AJAC®), it may not. What does this mean for healthcare providers who are adopting health IT sparked by federal incentive programs, such as MU, asks Sara Heath as she discussed the AJAC® study in Patient EngagementHIT. The retrospective study compared the percentage of top-box patient responses on the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Provider and System survey, prior to and after the implementation of electronic medication administration record, computerized provider order entry, and electronic progress notes. The researchers found that the combined impact of health IT had mixed results, none of which were significant. Â
Real-World Study Reveals Key Insights into DLBCL Treatment Patterns, Outcomes
April 18th 2024A recent study offers valuable insights into the characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in patients across different lines of therapy, providing a look into the landscape of DLBCL management.
Read More
Overcoming Employment Barriers for Lasting Social Impact: Freedom House 2.0 and Pathways to Work
April 16th 2024To help celebrate and recognize National Minority Health Month, we are bringing you a special month-long podcast series with our Strategic Alliance Partner, UPMC Health Plan. Welcome to our second episode, in which we learn all about Freedom House 2.0 and the Pathways to Work program.
Listen
Gene, Light Therapy Combo Shows Promise Against Prostate Cancer Cells in Proof-of-Concept Study
April 18th 2024In their preclinical model, the researchers found efficacy both in vitro and in vivo by using CRISPR-Cas9 to mimic porphyria and combining the technology with light therapy.
Read More
Making Giant Strides in Maternity Health Through Baby Steps
April 9th 2024To help celebrate and recognize National Minority Health Month, we are kicking off a special month-long podcast series with our strategic alliance partner, UPMC Health Plan. Welcome to our first episode, which is all about the Baby Steps Maternity Program and its mission to support women throughout every step of their pregnancy journey.
Listen
Collecting SDOH Data Can Assess Risk of Medical Nonadherence, Improve HEI and Star Ratings
April 18th 2024At the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) 2024 annual meeting, a panel of presenters explored changes coming to Medicare that incorporate social determinants of health (SDOH) data to improve patient and health system outcomes.
Read More