Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a progressive neurological disease that requires timely management, and a panel of neurologists has developed an internationally applicable standard of care for timely management in patients with MS.
A panel of multiple sclerosis (MS) neurologists developed an internationally applicable standard of care for timely management in patients with MS.
MS is a progressive neurological disease that requires timely management. Once neurons die, they cannot be replaced; thus, preservation strategies are of upmost importance. Quality standards and early treatment have shown to be crucial in treating MS. However, formalized standards have been lacking, causing disparities in care. To help reform this issue, a panel of neurologists participated in the Delphi process to standardize timely care for patients with MS.
The Delphi process consisted of 27 neurologists on the Delphi panel, 21 of whom completed the consensus. Areas of interest in timely management of MS included referral and diagnosis, priorities following diagnosis, routine monitoring and support, treatment decisions, and new symptoms. Each category was divided into 3 standard levels: core, achievable, and aspirational. Core constitutes to a level that should be achieved by most MS teams (minimum standard), achievable is a realistic target for most MS teams (standard of care), and aspirational should be achieved in advanced MS teams (high-quality care).
The difference between the 3 standard levels is in the time frames of care. For example, referral to a neurologist should be done in 4 weeks at the core level, but 10 days at the achievable level, and 4 days the aspirational level. These differences in time frame are meant to accommodate for the varying healthcare centers in the world and what tools they have in providing care.
Achievable standards of care for MS reflects good standard of care and the timings for each step is emphasized by the Delphi panel. Patients who experience their first symptoms related to MS should go to their primary physician within 10 days. Within the next 10 days, the primary physician should refer the patient to a neurologist. The neurologist should complete a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan within 2 weeks and all diagnostic workup and provide an accurate diagnosis within 4 weeks. Once the diagnostic workup is complete, the neurologist should discuss the results with the patient within 10 days, and if the patient is diagnosed with MS, he or she should be offered an initial appointment of at least 45 minutes.
Once the diagnosis of MS is made, the MS team should discuss treatment goals within 2 weeks, the importance of brain-healthy lifestyle within 4 weeks, and offer referrals for any additional lifestyle modification support that the patient may need within 3 months. The team should also check if the patient is eligible for a suitable disease-modifying therapy (DMT) and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of DMTs within 3 weeks of diagnosis. Routine evaluations of DMT, brain-healthy lifestyles, and comorbidity screenings should be done every 6 months, with a MRI scan offered every year.
Treatment decisions should also not be delayed in MS. Previous randomized clinical trials have found that early treatment with DMT was associated with better outcomes, specifically lower relapse rates. Once a patient is eligible for a DMT, he or she should be offered 1 within 3 weeks. Patients who agree to receive a DMT should be prescribed 1 within 2 weeks. Any patients who have suboptimal response to DMT should be offered an alternative DMT within 4 weeks. Patients who report new symptoms should report to their MS team within 7 days. The MS team should respond within 2 days and the patient should be seen within 3 days.
Timely management of MS leads to better outcomes and leads to less acute deterioration of the disease. Although the time frames for achievable level of care is not something every healthcare center can do, it is something to reach for and maintain.
Reference
Hobart J, Bowen A, Pepper G, et al. International consensus on quality standards for brain health-focused care in multiple sclerosis [published online November 1, 2018]. Mult Scler. doi: 10.1177/1352458518809326.
Standard Criteria for Loss of Ambulation Needed in DMD
April 19th 2024A recent study suggests the differences between ambulation definitions for patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) can impact the identification of ambulant vs nonambulant individuals, and standard criteria across settings are needed.
Read More
Government agencies have created an online portal for the public to report potential anticompetitive practices in health care; there are changes coming to the “boxed warning” section for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies (CAR T) to highlight T-cell blood cancer risk; questions about the safety of obesity medications during pregnancy have arisen in women on them who previously struggled with fertility issues.
Read More
Gene, Light Therapy Combo Shows Promise Against Prostate Cancer Cells in Proof-of-Concept Study
April 18th 2024In their preclinical model, the researchers found efficacy both in vitro and in vivo by using CRISPR-Cas9 to mimic porphyria and combining the technology with light therapy.
Read More
Pegcetacoplan for PNH More Cost-Effective Than Anti-C5 Monoclonal Antibodies
April 18th 2024A cost-utility analysis conducted from the perspective of the Italian health system found that pegcetacoplan was more effective and less costly than 2 complement 5 (C5) inhibitors for the treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH).
Read More