The effort to drive quality-based performance in physicians is now evident in the provision of preventive medicine.
The effort to drive quality-based performance in physicians is now evident in the provision of preventive medicine. Some doctors rely on prescribing drugs as a way to treat conditions, such as high blood pressure or diabetes, often ignoring more cost-effective options since they are usually rewarded for meeting quality targets regardless of how the targets were met.
Researchers at Dartmouth University including Dr Nancy Morden, an associate professor for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, and Professors Dr Elliot Fisher, Dr Lisa Schwartz, and Dr Steven Woloshin, say that current models of quality measurement do not incentivize physicians to use the most effective therapies or treatment options. The authors stress that there must be measures that will drive accountable care, and be grounded by the best evidence-based decisions.
“Physicians spend a lot of time treating numbers—blood pressure, cholesterol levels, and glycated hemoglobin levels. Professional guidelines, pharmaceutical marketing, and public health campaigns teach physicians and patients that better numbers mean success,” wrote the authors. “Unfortunately, better numbers don't reliably translate into what really matters: patients who feel better and live longer.”
For instance, instead of jumping right to prescribing the most costly drugs for patients diagnosed with hypertension, doctors could instead be measured in relation to how they incorporate diet or exercise into their treatment plans. This “accountable prescribing” will drive performance metrics that incentivize doctors based on more cost-effective measures.
As retail sales of drugs to treat high blood pressure, diabetes, and other conditions are projected to cost $283.7 billion in 2013—and spending on prescriptions to soar 8.8% in 2014 with insurance expansion—accountable prescribing will help drive value care based off quality, rather than poorly measured targets.
Dr Morden stated that evolving quality measures is a necessary challenge for doctors to face, so that payment can be more closely linked to effective performance. “Efficient, meaningful quality measures are hard to develop, and this is just a start,” she said.
Around the Web
Is Accountability for Patients? Or for Policy Wonks? [PNHP]
Reform Update: Docs Being Called to Use More Effective Treatments [Modern Healthcare]
Exclusive Telemedicine Use Linked to Less Favorable Glycemic Outcomes for T2D Endocrinology Care
December 6th 2023Adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) undergoing endocrinology care are more likely to experience less favorable hemoglobin A1c improvements if they only use telemedicine compared with patients using in-person care or a mix of both.
Read More
How Can Employers Leverage the DPP to Improve Diabetes Rates?
February 15th 2022On this episode of Managed Care Cast, Jill Hutt, vice president of member services at the Greater Philadelphia Business Coalition on Health, explains the Coalition’s efforts to reduce diabetes rates through the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP).
Listen
Study Reveals Factors That Further Increase Colorectal Cancer Risk for Adults With T2D
November 14th 2023The strongest associations between diabetes and colorectal cancer risk were observed in participants with a recent diabetes diagnosis and those who had not undergone recent colonoscopy, underscoring the significance of cancer screening.
Read More
Balancing Care Access and Fragmentation for Better Outcomes in Veterans With Diabetes
April 22nd 2021The authors of a study in the April 2021 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® discuss the possible reasons behind the link between care fragmentation and hospitalizations in veterans with diabetes, as well as potential opportunities to address disjointed care in the context of the widespread telehealth uptake seen during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Listen