
Report: Value-Based Care Strategies Effective, but Payers Struggle to Roll Them Out Quickly
A national study of 120 payers has found that nearly two-thirds of payments are now based on value, and value-based care is helping stakeholders to achieve the triple aim of lower costs, improved health, and better patient experiences.
A national study of 120 payers has found that nearly two-thirds of payments are now based on value, and value-based care is helping stakeholders to achieve the triple aim of lower costs, improved health, and better patient experiences.
The “Finding the Value: The State of Value-Based Reimbursement in 2018” report from Change Healthcare found that accountable care organizations (ACOs) are the value-based care strategy with the most maturity. Nearly half (48%) of respondents have established an ACO, with 24% growing one, 13% in a pilot, and 5% in the planning stages.
According to the report, all respondents reported some medical cost savings, with the majority reporting savings of at least 5%—37% reported savings between 5% and 7.49% and 24% reported savings of 7.5% or more. The average impact from value-base care strategies on medical cost savings was 5.6%.
As value-based strategies grow and continue to impact medical costs, fee-for-service is fading faster than expected, according to the report. Pure fee-for-service is projected to dip below 26% of reimbursement in just 3 years.
While up to half of payers found episode-of-care models very or extremely effective at improving care quality, and episode models delivered savings of 5% to 5.4% on average, payers have been struggling to engage providers in episode-of-care programs. Change Healthcare found 58% said it was extremely or very difficult to gain agreement on contracted budgets and risk/gain sharing; 51% found it extremely or very difficult to gain agreement on episode-of-care performance metrics/reports; 48% found it extremely or very difficult to engage providers to consider participating in an episode-of-care contract; and 43% found it extremely or very difficult to gain agreement on episode definitions and inclusion criteria.
"Payers are finding the positive impact of value-based care as they scale these models—particularly episodes of care—and that's starting to bend the cost curve in a significant way," Carolyn Wukitch, senior vice president and general manager, Network and Financial Management, Change Healthcare,
Innovation agility remains an issue. More than a third of payers said they need up to a year to launch a new episode-of-care program, 21% need up to 18 months, and 13% need 24 months or longer. According to Change, this is more than enough time for conditions to have changed in the healthcare market. Only 24% said they could roll out a new program in less than 6 months.
Newsletter
Stay ahead of policy, cost, and value—subscribe to AJMC for expert insights at the intersection of clinical care and health economics.